What's new

Remembering " ZA Bhutto "

pak-marine

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
11,639
Reaction score
-22
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Editorial
Strange request Strange request Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto entered public life at the early age of 30, in 1958. In his book The Myth of Independence he writes about his views on foreign policy and the paramount objectives of Pakistan’s people.

I was a student in those days and whenever I heard that he was to address the National Assembly, which was then housed in Rawalpindi’s Lalkurti, I would be in attendance.

As a result of his disagreement over the Tashkent Declaration, Bhutto resigned in June 1966. That evening I rushed to his residence at Rawalpindi’s Civil Lines and found the place thronged with people waiting to pay their respects. Mr Bhutto then left for Lahore, travelling by rail, and was given a tumultuous welcome that unnerved the regime of the day.

When Mr Bhutto initiated his movement against Ayub Khan, the first shot at his procession was fired near the Polytechnic College on Peshawar Road. It killed a student, which triggered riots all over Punjab. I was there on the premises of the Intercontinental Hotel, Rawalpindi, when police raided the place in order to arrest Bhutto, whose movement gained momentum as it was joined by millions.

Pakistan was in shambles when he took over power. Morale was low and faith in the survival of the country was receding, yet with his very first speech on television he managed to inspire the nation.

Amongst Mr Bhutto’s greatest achievements was the 1973 Constitution. Another was the first jurists’ conference, held in Karachi in 1973. I had the honour of hearing Mr Bhutto speak in the presence of the great judges and jurists of the time: he expressed his desire to transform the polity of the nation following the principles of Islamic social justice. It was then that he coined the term ‘Islamic socialism’.

He was indeed a true leader of the people, bringing about changes in labour and other laws to ameliorate the lot of the citizenry. Impressed by Olaf Palme and the manifesto of the Social Democratic Party of Sweden, he wished to adopt in Pakistan the Swedish paradigm.

Mr Bhutto was at his best, perhaps, at the Islamic Summit organised in Lahore in 1974. I had never before seen such a galaxy of Muslim leaders as was gathered at the Shalamar Gardens reception. Their presence showed their respect for him but unfortunately, his emerging stature in the international arena also engendered jealousies against him. Regardless, another of his landmark achievements was the commencement of Pakistan’s nuclear programmes, as well as the retrieval of prisoners of the 1971 war.

The trial against Mr Bhutto for conspiracy to murder commenced on October 24, 1977; I attended some of the proceedings at the Lahore High Court and paid respects to Mr Bhutto twice during the time he was confined in a specially built dock in the court of the Chief Justice. He remained undaunted in spirit, though saddened. The controversial trial shocked many around the world and in The Judiciary and Politics in Pakistan, M. Dilawar Mahmood observes:

“It would be argued for the years to come whether Mr Bhutto ever got a fair trial. If the apprehension and pleadings of the accused are any criterion then Mr Bhutto’s Transfer Application moved in the high court as well as in the Supreme Court of Pakistan bear ample testimony to the fact that he never got a fair trial.”

And in Daughter of the East Benazir Bhutto quotes John Matthews, QC, a British lawyer who witnessed the trial and was shocked by the proceedings.

What baffles me most is why Mr Bhutto’s statement was not recorded under Section 342 of the Criminal Code of Pakistan which provides an undertrial person the opportunity to make a statement, spell out an alternate theory or reasons for his false involvement.

He did address the Supreme Court during the appeal, though:

“Everyone who is made of flesh has to leave this world one day. I do not want life as life, but I want justice […] The question is not that I have to establish my innocence; the question is that the prosecution has to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. I want my innocence to be established not for the person of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto. I want it established for the higher consideration that this has been a grotesque injustice. It puts the Dreyfus case in the shade.”

In my view this was a fit case for remand and retrial inter alia on the plea of bias and for providing Mr Bhutto the opportunity to record his statement under the aforementioned clause of the criminal code.

Yet on Feb 6, 1979, the Supreme Court gave its four to three vote upholding the death sentence. However, Mr Bhutto is vindicated by the fact that his case is never quoted as a legal precedent. Mr Bhutto was executed on April 4, 1979, despite unprecedented levels of international outcry. I was returning home from Attock where I was posted as a judge in the sessions court when I heard news of the execution. Murree Road was empty; a dark, dusty wind blew and many people cried that day “Zulm ho gaya” (“Grave injustice has been done”).

Justice (retd) Javed Iqbal, Allama Iqbal’s son, told me a personal story. He said he had been in bed when in the middle of the night, he thought he saw Mr Bhutto saying “Look, doctor, what have they done to me”. As he tried to awaken his wife, the figure disappeared. Later, he learned that the execution had taken place at about the same time.

Henry Kissinger, whose discomfort with Mr Bhutto can be read about in his book The White House Years, said about the execution: “[…] But his courage and vision in 1971 should have earned him a better fate than the tragic end his passionate countrymen meted out to him and that blighted their reputation for mercy.”

The visionary leader was physically eliminated but lives perennially in our hearts and minds; may Allah bless the soul of this martyr.
 
.
Just wonder if he was never executed by a dictotor where would have Pak be today !? member share your thoughts please
 
.
On his death anniversary, revisiting his life and wondering about alternate realities, I just happened to stumble as usual across Doc Kazi's amazing flickr photstream.

I'm sharing with you two iconic pictures from the OIC Summit in '74 at Lahore:-




2185372118_8d63ce05ff.jpg

Just three years ago, things were entirely different.
 
.
On his death anniversary, revisiting his life and wondering about alternate realities, I just happened to stumble as usual across Doc Kazi's amazing flickr photstream.

I'm sharing with you two iconic pictures from the OIC Summit in '74 at Lahore:-




2185372118_8d63ce05ff.jpg

Just three years ago, things were entirely different.



thanks for sharing the links .... what really happened in 3 years which landed Bhutto in the gallows ? why Pakistanis were sitting back and watching their popular leader die just like that?

In my understanding he was infact still is the most famous person and supported by a lot of Pakistanis. Pakistanis rallied behind him in millions from Sindh to punjab!
 
.
Just wonder if he was never executed by a dictotor where would have Pak be today !? member share your thoughts please

There's the idea that nationalization would have finally resulted in a much better socialized economy and the flawed implementation followed by the lag that was inevitable would have delivered. If that were the case, we would have been a much better country by now. At least, we wouldn't have had to bow in front of super powers time and again. One wonders how ZAB would have responded to the Soviet Invasion.

The other path is of utter destruction. Bhutto's narcissistic and all empowering personality and his trait of domineering and micromanagement might have just led us to become a banana republic. He might have become Saparmurat Niyazov (aka Turkemenbashi).

There is a charm and charisma about him that attracts every reader but as you start critically examining his life we find deep flaws rooted in his suspicion of every political ally and his egoistic tendencies. Yet, his footprint is so massive that the ghost of Bhutto haunts us to date.

I remember discussing him with a poor old man in rural Sindh. I asked him why even after so many years he defended ZAB when he failed to implement the promised land reforms in Sindh. His reply was straight and simple. He said, "ذولفقار علی بھتو سے پہلے ہماری کوئی زبان نہیں تھی. وہ جیسا بھی تھا اس نے ہم غریبوں کو زبان اور آواز دی" and this really moved me.

People who oppose him violently were either victims of his abuse or are plain ignorant. Education is not going to school and getting a verification of one's own shortsighted, intolerant and biased opinions. Critical examination and objectivity hardly ever lead to hating of a national leader. He had his flaws and he had many a good traits. Which outweigh the other demands on how you evaluate him. If you evaluate him with a lens tinted with hatred and prejudice, you are bound to reach a conclusion you had reached long before.

As Stanley Wolpert said, ZAB is "the most controversial personality of Pakistani history, people either love him or hate him but it is impossible not to have an opinion about him". In my opinion, he has been demonized and exorcised for reasons obvious (which I'd like not to mention) and hero-worshiping him has been a by-product of this demonization as well. I don't really expect to hear much praise about him in these forums though :angel:

The fact remains that the trial was biased, a farce, lacked fairplay and was carried out under a military junta at the behest of a man who knew that "It is either his neck or mine! ... I have not convicted him, and if they hold him guilty, my God, I am not going to let him off!".
 
.
here is another version i read today dawn ,

The majority of Muslims in Pakistan are ensconced in the popular Barelvi creed of Islam that is the mainstay of Muslims in the subcontinent. It reassures the enshrinement of the traditional Sufism that prevailed due to a long period of interaction between Islam and the esoteric strains of Hinduism and other faiths of India.

‘Folk’ Islam became the dominating creed of the rural peasant, the urban proletariat and the semi-urban petty-bourgeoisie. It incorporated the anti-clergy elements of Sufism, and a more relaxed fiqh, fusing these with accommodating forms of worship and the concept of overt religious reverence of people it considered divine. The result was a sub-continental Muslim ethos that was socially tolerant and repulsed by the puritan dogma.

Though agrarian in its worldview, ‘folk’ Islam did not negatively react to modern Islamic reform initiated by rationalists like Syed Ahmed Khan, and consequently (by the 1960s), it became the chosen expression of populist (secular) politics in Pakistan. The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) became the first Pakistani political party to set the tone of its rhetoric according to the populist imagery of ‘folk’ Islam, in the process managing to attract the urban working classes and the rural peasantry towards its social-democratic programme.

Not only did the PPP chairman, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, become one of the first major Pakistani political figures to start being seen indulging in rituals associated with ‘folk’ Islam (such as visiting Sufi shrines), PPP rallies too started radiating an aura of the colourful activity found at many Sufi shrines. The 1970s in Pakistan thus became an era of populist extroversion.

With ‘folk’ Islam adopted as a populist political expression by the ruling PPP, this form of expression eventually became the tool that culturally connected the country’s secular political parties with the spiritual and political moorings of the working classes and the peasants.

The cultural synthesis emerging from such a connection was one of the reasons behind Bhutto’s image, graduating from being that of a ‘brave patriot’ (1967-68), to becoming a people’s messiah (1970s) and the embodiment of a Sufi saint posthumously.

The ZAB regime was a vibrant mix of rural and urban populism (such as through the promotion of folk and proletariat art and music), and of modern bourgeois liberalism that helped urban society maintain a liberal aura. Night-clubs, horse racing and cinemas continued to thrive; religiosity largely remained a private matter, or manifest itself in a display of passion at shrines through dhamal, qawali, etc.

However, lurking within this mix was also an awkward anomaly. As the popular variation of Islam in Pakistan peaked in the 1970s, the modern variation (tied to the Aligarh thought) started to erode when things started to change within some state institutions after the 1971 East Pakistan debacle. A move was seen afoot in the army towards puritanical strain of Islam, especially those advocated by renowned Islamic scholar and the Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) chief, Abul Ala Maududi.

The JI was an early advocate of what came to be known as Political Islam. It first emerged as an opponent of secular/socialist Muslim nationalism in the 1950s and 1960s and was also opposed to the more populist strains of the faith. The JI was eventually successful in converting a sizable section of the urban middleclass to its cause after the former stopped resonating with the modern, reformist tradition of Syed Ahmed Khan. The populist ‘folk’ Islam they began to associate with ‘Bhuttoism’ or a ‘vulgar’ populism, supposedly aimed at undoing the hold on society of bourgeois politics and economics.

Thus, the urban bourgeoisie and the petty-bourgeoisie became the main players against the Bhutto regime during the 1977 PNA movement, led by the JI and its allies. But it wasn’t until the arrival of the Ziaul Haq dictatorship and the anti-Soviet Afghan Jihad that political Islam managed to find state approval.

As the US and Saudi Arabia pumped in millions of dollars of aid for the ‘jihad’, the more aggressive and puritanical strains of Islam that were largely alien to the region’s Muslims began finding official sanction as well. But in spite of the rapid proliferation of the jihadi mindset and penetration of puritanical Islam in the workings of society that Zia initiated, Bhutto is still remembered as an icon in the devotional sense of loyalty to the culture of ‘folk’ Islam.

Thus, it is not surprising that his death is not seen by his supporters as martyrdom gained through the puritanical concept of ‘jihad’ against an infidel. Instead, his execution by the Zia dictatorship is embroiled in the kind of folk imagery that would leave the Islamists cringing. It is remembered more as a murder of a modern Sufi saint who danced to the gallows in defiance of a usurper and his malicious, scheming team of puritan clerics

In simple terms what the author is saying that this radicalised fundo problem is not new by getting rid of Bhutto they got even firm control in Pakistan and the murder of Bhutto is more to do with religion (sectarian) than any thing else.
 
Last edited:
. . .
GREAT MAN & EVEN A BETTER LEADER ,I REALLY ADMIRE HIM,PAKISTAN NEEDS MORE LEADERS LIKE HIM.:pakistan:

Some body please post complete version (text or video) of his adress to UN security council thanks in advance.:)

 
.
As a young teenager in the late 70's in Karachi I remember the execution of ZAB; I remember some rumors that ZAB was to be executed on the 4th. I remember I was WISHING that ZAB not be spared the execution. I remembered Pir Pagara's exhortations to the people to ask for some mercy should ZAB be released....
But, as I grew older, I realized the grave injustice done to ZAB and to Pakistan. He was a flawed leader--and who is not a flawed leader in Pakistan?-- but he was a smart, independent,nationalist leader who was determined to make Pakistan progress. There is no doubt in my mind that Pakistan was an independent country which could defy both Superpowers those days.
Rest in Peace, ZAB.
 
. .
yes ... he was a good leader ... so much love for he had in his country that he killed to be in a same position.... that is where he went wrong... yes if zia dident take ove our country preety much would have been gone... please rememder we where in the cold war russia was above our head we needed to be military strong to take on the russians .... if we dident even have zia let just say we would have been tiawan to china but with russia....
 
.
@Zagahaga,
Whether ZAB or Zia, Pakistan would have (and perhaps should have?) countered the Soviet-influence in Afghanistan and Pakistan was going to be supported by the resources of many powerful, rich countries in doing so. And Pakistan would be left with no choice by the West: There was a golden-opportunity to payback for Vietnam. How the hell can then Zia be credited with beefing up Pakistan's defences? You know, it is not hard to do so when there are so many backers for your effort.
It is a different matter that the manner in which Zia or ZAB would have conducted the war. ZAB's instincts were liberal and Zia's were retrogressive. And, as they say, 'the rest is history': Zia capitalized on him being annointed 'the benevolent dictator' followed his natural instincts not just in training the Mujahideens but also using the resources, the breathing space, the suppression to do a major social-engineering in the rest of Pakistan. That much is agreed upon by all now, including Zia's adopted son Nawaz Sharif.
What would Bhutto have done instead? I don't know. But I really doubt he, who lost no opportunity in taking on the mullahs, would turn Pakistan into a jihadi factory. Now, as we all know, Bhutto did do some appeasing of the right-wing by some ostensible 'Islamic' measures but Pakistan was largely Sufi-oriented, liberal, until well into the late 70's.

PS. It is good to see that even the most anti-Bhutto elements like Cowasjee are now forced to say :"May his soul rest in peace".

DAWN.COM | Columnists | De facto versus de jure - 3
 
.
جس دھج سے کوئی مقتل میں گیا وہ شان سلامت رہتی ہے

یہ جان تو آنی جانی ہے اس جان کی کوئی بات نہیں



fe-chaudhry-bhutto-court-11.jpg


FE-Chaudhry-Bhutto-court-2.jpg


FE-Chaudhry-Bhutto-court-3.jpg


FE-Chaudhry-Bhutto-court-4.jpg


1422920419_29cef8c05f.jpg
 
.
meengla,

you think the americans would have backed us up by supporting us if russians invaded paksitan and afganistan

here that the support you where about to get ... acting like that to the security council dosent get you cheese and cracker . thank god we had zia beacuse if he dident keep close ties with the USA we would have ended up like a another afganistan.


he let persional feelings come into politics which is wrong ....


ps. Iam glad to see the so called wannabee liberals poping their heads out for once and ghetting a wack at the ball.:yahoo:

ps. that the only video i could have found on the internet so please dont say i did that on pourpose

h
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Back
Top Bottom