What's new

Religious Fundamentalism Could Be Treated As A Mental Illness

MM_Haider

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Dec 3, 2010
Messages
2,296
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
China
Kathleen Taylor, Neuroscientist, Says Religious Fundamentalism Could Be Treated As A Mental Illness

Kathleen Taylor, Neuroscientist, Says Religious Fundamentalism Could Be Treated As A Mental Illness

An Oxford University researcher and author specializing in neuroscience has suggested that one day religious fundamentalism may be treated as a curable mental illness.

Kathleen Taylor, who describes herself as a "science writer affiliated to the Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics," made the suggestion during a presentation on brain research at the Hay Literary Festival in Wales on Wednesday.

In response to a question about the future of neuroscience, Taylor said that "One of the surprises may be to see people with certain beliefs as people who can be treated," The Times of London notes.

“Someone who has for example become radicalised to a cult ideology -- we might stop seeing that as a personal choice that they have chosen as a result of pure free will and may start treating it as some kind of mental disturbance," Taylor said. “In many ways it could be a very positive thing because there are no doubt beliefs in our society that do a heck of a lot of damage."

The author went on to say she wasn't just referring to the "obvious candidates like radical Islam," but also meant such beliefs as the idea that beating children is acceptable.

Taylor was not immediately available for comment.

This is not the first time Taylor has explored the mind processes of a radical. In 2006, she wrote a book about mind control called Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control, which explored the science behind the persuasive tactics of such groups as cults and al Qaeda.

"We all change our beliefs of course," Taylor said in a YouTube video about the book. "We all persuade each other to do things; we all watch advertising; we all get educated and experience [religions.] Brainwashing, if you like, is the extreme end of that; it's the coercive, forceful, psychological torture type."

Taylor also noted that brainwashing, though extreme, is part of a the "much more widespread phenomenon" of persuasion. That is, "how we make people think things that might not be good for them, that they might not otherwise have chosen to think."

However, Taylor has also been a voice of caution in terms of the ethics of delving too deeply into the human brain's mysterious workings.

"Technologies which directly scan or manipulate brains cannot be neutral tools, as open to commercial exploitation as any new gadget," Taylor wrote in a blog post for The Huffington Post in 2012. "The brain supremacy offers chances to improve human dignity, but it also risks abuse."
 
I would like to disagree, fundamentalism is a philosophical and political malice, yes, but not a mental one. People are indoctrinated, yes, but their functioning and their connection with reality (in Psychological terms) stays. Studies have shown cult members to be as sane as normal folks, this is an encroachment on personal liberties. It's is political and we should deal it as such. Believe what you want, don't kill people on it.
 
If religious extreemism is illness, then founder/maker of all religion are ill person :P



Its a huge blashphemy on manmade religions.. and there founder// :P
 
Cool now it can be used as an excuse to let off religious bigots.. After all he is abnormal right? :rolleyes:
 
If religious extreemism is illness, then founder/maker of all religion are ill person :P



Its a huge blashphemy on manmade religions.. and there founder// :P
The author does not indicate founders of the religion as patients. In my opinion none of the founders/professors of religion advocated extremism. Followers of religion created extremist pockets, based on their own interpretation of the religion. Without commenting on rightness of any belief, a prudent look indicates that all the religions have given one basic message; humility. It is something else that certain individuals deciphered the message by inducing terror to eliminate terrorism or force ones own concepts on others. These fundamentals have nothing to do with religion, but only linked to monetary or power part of global affairs.
 
I don't mind if electric shocks are part of the treatment! :)
 
The author does not indicate founders of the religion as patients. In my opinion none of the founders/professors of religion advocated extremism. Followers of religion created extremist pockets, based on their own interpretation of the religion. Without commenting on rightness of any belief, a prudent look indicates that all the religions have given one basic message; humility. It is something else that certain individuals deciphered the message by inducing terror to eliminate terrorism or force ones own concepts on others. These fundamentals have nothing to do with religion, but only linked to monetary or power part of global affairs.




Why one made new religion?? out of frustration (disease). Out of extremism (to spread there religion).. If author is right, then those founders were ill.....

They got Religion...
 
Why one made new religion?? out of frustration (disease). Out of extremism (to spread there religion).. If author is right, then those founders were ill.....

They got Religion...

It is the same question why made cars when horses could do the job, or why tablets when computer was already there. Each human mind is different from other. Some are extra ordinarily intelligent and some dumbest of all. If someone had an IQ capable enough to come up with a code of conduct, which could survive for decades, then these people are intelligent and not mentally sick. If what you say is true then inventors, philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, etc are all sick. Only average and below average minds are sane.
 
It is the same question why made cars when horses could do the job, or why tablets when computer was already there. Each human mind is different from other. Some are extra ordinarily intelligent and some dumbest of all. If someone had an IQ capable enough to come up with a code of conduct, which could survive for decades, then these people are intelligent and not mentally sick. If what you say is true then inventors, philosophers, scientists, mathematicians, etc are all sick. Only average and below average minds are sane.



No the analogy is not correct... Car was made for improvement where as religion was made due to jealousy, arrogance, lack of understanding...


Since old religion has something wrong they made a new religion. After sometime there new religion also get dirty.. The religion owner/founder brainwash some follower (Brainwashing is ultimate degree of terrorism)...


These contagious religions are like MLM (Multi-Level-Marketing).. To spread itself it use all immoral and inhuman methods..
 
No the analogy is not correct... Car was made for improvement where as religion was made due to jealousy, arrogance, lack of understanding...


Since old religion has something wrong they made a new religion. After sometime there new religion also get dirty.. The religion owner/founder brainwash some follower (Brainwashing is ultimate degree of terrorism)...


These contagious religions are like MLM (Multi-Level-Marketing).. To spread itself it use all immoral and inhuman methods..

Well, you have yourself said that cars were made to do the improvement and also mentioned that new religions were made to remove wrongs from old religion. Yet you say new religion are results of jealousy, arrogance and lack of understanding. Based on your explanation I would term it as improvement or in other words, with the passage of time followers digress from original thus re-enforcement.

I will differ to your point of view on brainwashing followers for terrorism. No religion teaches terrorism; it is only the followers interpret for terrorism in that.
 
Back
Top Bottom