What's new

Regular missile tests maintain India-Pakistan status quo

HariPrasad

BANNED
Joined
Aug 5, 2013
Messages
14,055
Reaction score
-22
Country
India
Location
India
Regular missile tests maintain India-Pakistan status quo
Published May 16, 2015 | By admin
SOURCE : IANS

agni5-new-650_650x400_61422691292.jpg


Last month, India tested its indigenously-developed 3,000-km Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile Agni III, while Pakistan tested its 1,300-km Medium Range Ballistic Missile Ghauri.Both missiles are part of an ever-growing arsenal capable of reaching every corner of rival territory (including India’s Andaman Islands) and carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads.

Ironically, these tests are also a good way of ensuring the two countries do not go to war.“Such tests are considered routine exercises for the two arch-rivals since they developed nuclear weapons capabilities in 1998,” according to Foreign Policy.

Nuclear weapons carried by ballistic missiles are strategic weapons of mass destruction meant primarily to scare and deter, usually ending in strategic stalemates between countries that possess such arsenals.
The possibility of “mutually assured destruction”, or MAD, as it is commonly known, also prevents their use on the subcontinentIndia’s ballistic-missile programme is driven by the threat it perceives from its nuclear armed neighbours Pakistan and China.

On May 11, 1998, India’s then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee declared to the world that India had become a nuclear weapons state after successfully detonating three devices.Less than three weeks later, Pakistan also conducted nuclear weapons tests.

On the 17th year anniversary of India’s nuclear weapons test, Prime Minister Narendra Modi lauded the efforts of Indian scientists with the following tweet:”We salute efforts of our scientists & political leadership behind the success of Pokhran Tests on this day in 1998. pic.twitter.com/vPVb1v6xxk — Narendra Modi (@narendramodi) May 11, 2015?Almost 17 years later, the arch rivals each test fired ballistic missiles.

These are strategic delivery systems capable of delivering either nuclear or conventional warheads deep inside each other’s territory, with the focus being predominantly on the former.Land, fire and falconsWhen it comes to Pakistan, India has developed/is developing the Prithvi and Agni series of surface-to-surface ballistic missiles.
The Prithvi series comprises three short-range ballistic missiles (SRBM) with a range of 150-350 km, capable of targeting major Pakistani cities, such as Lahore, Sialkot, the capital Islamabad and Rawalpindi according to an IndiaSpend analysis.

The Prithvi series are road mobile and deployed. Development of the Prithvi series began in 1983.Agni I and II, with ranges of 700 km and 2,000 km respectively, are capable of targeting almost all major Pakistani cities, including Lahore, Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Multan, Peshawar, Karachi, Quetta and Gwadar.

The development of the Agni I began in 1999, and it was first tested in January 2002. The Agni I fills the gap between the SRBM Prithvi series and medium-range Agni II missile.It has been in service since 2004.The Agni II is a medium-range ballistic missile (MRBM), first tested in April 1999.

It allows India to attack all of Pakistan, although it falls short of major targets within China. Like Agni I, it too is highly accurate and is road and rail mobile.Agni III, IV and V, with their longer ranges, might be able to reach all of Pakistan, but it can be safely said that they are directed more towards China.Pakistan’s Hatf (named after the sword of Prophet Muhammad, pbuh) series of ballistic missiles have been developed–and is still under development–keeping India in mind.

These missiles have varying ranges starting from 70 km, and go up to 2750 km.Some of these missiles are variants of existing Chinese and North Korean ballistic missiles, according to a report on Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme by the National Institute of Advanced Studies (NIAS), Bangalore.

Of these, the operational SRBM Ghaznavi (named after the 11th-century Afghan invader Mahmud Ghazni) is a shortened version of the Chinese M-11 missile and has a range of between 270 km to 350 km; this means it can target Ludhiana, Ahmedabad and and the outer perimeter of Delhi.The recently-tested Ghauri (named after 12th-century Afghan king Shahbuddin Ghauri, also known as Muhammad of Ghauri) is an MRBM, with a claimed range of 1,300 km and is “clearly and unambiguously North Korean in origin”, according to the NIAS report.
 
.
Nuclear war between India and Pakistan is not a question of "IF" anymore, it's about "when" now.

Sadly, leaders on the Indian side are high on "India supa powa" mantra and are not ready to tackle the disputes.
 
. .
Range is not a problem considering our superior Space Programme,we need Thermonuclear weapons (if we don't possess already) and MIRV.

We already have effective 2nd strike capability by Jaguar and TU 22M.


wwwindianembassyam/pages.php?id=99
 
.
Nuclear war between India and Pakistan is not a question of "IF" anymore, it's about "when" now.

Sadly, leaders on the Indian side are high on "India supa powa" mantra and are not ready to tackle the disputes.

If you see disputes...then there are disputes, If you see no disputes...then there are no disputes.

My call for Pakistanis is to integrate into Indian economy and let us all enjoy the development and economic well being. If you want to remain isolated you will be the looser. In any case India with go forward with sub regional economic union comprising of Nepal, BD, Burma, Bhutan, SL and India
 
.
Nuclear war between India and Pakistan is not a question of "IF" anymore, it's about "when" now.

Sadly, leaders on the Indian side are high on "India supa powa" mantra and are not ready to tackle the disputes.
Stop being an innocent cow.
 
.
If you see disputes...then there are disputes, If you see no disputes...then there are no disputes.

My call for Pakistanis is to integrate into Indian economy and let us all enjoy the development and economic well being. If you want to remain isolated you will be the looser. In any case India with go forward with sub regional economic union comprising of Nepal, BD, Burma, Bhutan, SL and India
Who said Pakistan is isolated? Pakistan is one of the least isolated countries in the world, Pakistan is as isolated as India.
 
. .
Nuclear war between India and Pakistan is not a question of "IF" anymore, it's about "when" now.

Sadly, leaders on the Indian side are high on "India supa powa" mantra and are not ready to tackle the disputes.
I disagree with your first point. Nuclear symmetry means MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction). Therefore, a nuclear war will never happen unless a mad mullah takes over Pakistan's nuclear command, which needless to say is almost impossible.

Your second point about tackling disputes. When you have already bartered half of the disputed region of Azad Kashmir (GB) to China for construction of highways etc, what dispute are you talking about? You have already taken it for granted that Azad Kashmir belongs to you. Otherwise how can you illegally allow construction on disputed territory by another country? And have you even bothered to ask the people of Azad Kashmir since you guys continually harp on the standard phrase, 'wishes of the Kashmiri people'. Did they wish this Chinese project on their land?
 
.
I disagree with your first point. Nuclear symmetry means MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction). Therefore, a nuclear war will never happen unless a mad mullah takes over Pakistan's nuclear command, which needless to say is almost impossible.
Not really. There were a lot of crazies who were asking Manmohan singh to start a war in 2008, same with Vajpayee in 2002. What if one of those crazies succeeds in persuading the political leadership? it takes just one idiot to ruin everything. So saying that only Pakistan will start a nuclear war is biased.
 
.
Not really. There were a lot of crazies who were asking Manmohan singh to start a war in 2008, same with Vajpayee in 2002. What if one of those crazies succeeds in persuading the political leadership? it takes just one idiot to ruin everything. So saying that only Pakistan will start a nuclear war is biased.
See, it takes at least a month to get to know a country's intentions. These are called battle indicators. During this time, geopolitics will come to the fore wherein the world powers will force the adversaries' hands off the nuclear triggers as the stakes would be extremely high because a nuclear war will not only affect the subcontinent but the world as a whole.

The so called Cold Start Doctrine is a figment of imagination. There's no such doctrine and thus there will be no surprise offensive. However, local skirmishes like Kargil cannot be completely ruled out though there's a 10% chance of that happening. An all out war is out of the question in this age and thus zero chance of a nuclear conflagration.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom