What's new

Refugee women are being sexually abused at the EU border. Where is the outrage?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Numerous

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
During the first two weeks of August, when most people in Western Europe were enjoying their summer holidays, volunteers from No Name Kitchen, a group helping migrants in Bosnia,recorded 17 cases of violence against people on the move at the country's border with Croatia. (The UNHCR recently reported that their partners in Bosnia and Serbia recorded over 700 allegations of violence at the borders of Croatia since the beginning of this year.)

In at least five of the 17 cases recorded by No Name Kitchen, the victims were vulnerable women who were trying to reach safety in the European Union. Volunteers said these women were treated brutally by the authorities and subjected to sexual violence, racism and Islamophobia.

Marva, from Afghanistan, told them the group she was travelling with was stopped by police after they crossed the Slovenian border. She said the officers ordered the women in the group to remove their niqabs. When she refused to do so and started to cry, a policeman forcefully removed the garment and threw it on the floor. "Here is not Afghanistan, here is Slovenia," the policeman allegedly told her. "Here is no Islam."

Fatima, from Iran, had a similar experience, but in Croatia. Her husband and daughter were beaten up by police officers. She was held at gun point and they were all ordered to walk back to Bosnia. She said she was scared to death. She thought they were going to kill her and her family.

Several victims said officers inappropriately touched their bodies, including their breasts and genitals, during these violent encounters. They said the abuse happened in front of their children and husbands. The abusers were always in uniform.

Police violence and brutality is nothing new at the borders of European Union. Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian and Greek police officers have long been resorting to violence in order to keep Fortress Europe "safe". Croatian police joined in this brutality last year, and now even Slovenian police is abusing people on the move at their borders.

As always, this violence is affecting the women the most. They are not only violently prevented from finding safety and security in Europe, but also subjected to sexual violence. And their abusers act with impunity.

No one in Brussels, or in any other European capital, has punished or even condemned these officers for their treatment of women at Europe's borders - not even in countries led by women or where leftist, progressive parties are in power.

In the last two years, the #MeToo movement encouraged the world to have a conversation about sexual harassment and condemn men who use their positions of power to abuse women. However, the abuse women (as well as men and children) experience at the hands of border officials at the gates of Europe was never included in this conversation.

European media also contributed to this problem by failing to give a voice to these victims.

On New Year's Eve 2015 many local women reported being robbed and assaulted inCologne, Germany and authorities said most of the accused were North African, migrant men. The media was quick to sensationalise the issue and create a narrative which implied European women are in need of urgent protection from brown, Muslim, migrant men. Authorities were quick to take action.

However, now that migrant women are the victims, the media is largely silent, and the same EU officials urging action on the Cologne attacks are looking the other way.

The violence at the borders of the EU is a message to all migrants - and everyone who is not a citizen of Fortress Europe - that they are not welcome, not even when they are running from wars, persecution, authoritarian regimes, poverty or the devastating effects of climate change. It doesn't matter that Europe is responsible for many ills that are forcing these people to leave their homes and seek safety in foreign lands.

:iberals in the EU are still refusing to acknowledge this loud and clear message sent out by their official representatives. They congratulate themselves on their "humane treatment" of migrants, and refuse to acknowledge the human rights abuses taking place at their doorstep. They hypocritically condemn the US administration for separating families trying to cross US borders, but talk nothing of the abuse of migrants at Europe's borders.

Is the violence migrants endure in Europe any more acceptable than what happens in Trump's America? In "liberal", "progressive" Europe human beings are being physically and sexually abused at borders, threatened and kept in camps indefinitely. Children are often left alone, unprotected, and deprived of an education and a future.

What the EU border police is doing to vulnerable women, men and children is a crime and it cannot go unpunished.

If Europe does not act now, it will soon become a place where violence against "the other" is acceptable. This has happened many times before in recent history, and humanity at large suffered its consequences. Europe should learn from its past mistakes, and this time make sure it's on the right side of history.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/metoo-fortress-europe-borders-180905074913780.html
 
Here is an idea for Europe: open doors for female refugees but shut the doors tight for male refugees.
 
During the first two weeks of August, when most people in Western Europe were enjoying their summer holidays, volunteers from No Name Kitchen, a group helping migrants in Bosnia,recorded 17 cases of violence against people on the move at the country's border with Croatia. (The UNHCR recently reported that their partners in Bosnia and Serbia recorded over 700 allegations of violence at the borders of Croatia since the beginning of this year.)

In at least five of the 17 cases recorded by No Name Kitchen, the victims were vulnerable women who were trying to reach safety in the European Union. Volunteers said these women were treated brutally by the authorities and subjected to sexual violence, racism and Islamophobia.

Marva, from Afghanistan, told them the group she was travelling with was stopped by police after they crossed the Slovenian border. She said the officers ordered the women in the group to remove their niqabs. When she refused to do so and started to cry, a policeman forcefully removed the garment and threw it on the floor. "Here is not Afghanistan, here is Slovenia," the policeman allegedly told her. "Here is no Islam."

Fatima, from Iran, had a similar experience, but in Croatia. Her husband and daughter were beaten up by police officers. She was held at gun point and they were all ordered to walk back to Bosnia. She said she was scared to death. She thought they were going to kill her and her family.

Several victims said officers inappropriately touched their bodies, including their breasts and genitals, during these violent encounters. They said the abuse happened in front of their children and husbands. The abusers were always in uniform.

Police violence and brutality is nothing new at the borders of European Union. Hungarian, Romanian, Bulgarian and Greek police officers have long been resorting to violence in order to keep Fortress Europe "safe". Croatian police joined in this brutality last year, and now even Slovenian police is abusing people on the move at their borders.

As always, this violence is affecting the women the most. They are not only violently prevented from finding safety and security in Europe, but also subjected to sexual violence. And their abusers act with impunity.

No one in Brussels, or in any other European capital, has punished or even condemned these officers for their treatment of women at Europe's borders - not even in countries led by women or where leftist, progressive parties are in power.

In the last two years, the #MeToo movement encouraged the world to have a conversation about sexual harassment and condemn men who use their positions of power to abuse women. However, the abuse women (as well as men and children) experience at the hands of border officials at the gates of Europe was never included in this conversation.

European media also contributed to this problem by failing to give a voice to these victims.

On New Year's Eve 2015 many local women reported being robbed and assaulted inCologne, Germany and authorities said most of the accused were North African, migrant men. The media was quick to sensationalise the issue and create a narrative which implied European women are in need of urgent protection from brown, Muslim, migrant men. Authorities were quick to take action.

However, now that migrant women are the victims, the media is largely silent, and the same EU officials urging action on the Cologne attacks are looking the other way.

The violence at the borders of the EU is a message to all migrants - and everyone who is not a citizen of Fortress Europe - that they are not welcome, not even when they are running from wars, persecution, authoritarian regimes, poverty or the devastating effects of climate change. It doesn't matter that Europe is responsible for many ills that are forcing these people to leave their homes and seek safety in foreign lands.

:iberals in the EU are still refusing to acknowledge this loud and clear message sent out by their official representatives. They congratulate themselves on their "humane treatment" of migrants, and refuse to acknowledge the human rights abuses taking place at their doorstep. They hypocritically condemn the US administration for separating families trying to cross US borders, but talk nothing of the abuse of migrants at Europe's borders.

Is the violence migrants endure in Europe any more acceptable than what happens in Trump's America? In "liberal", "progressive" Europe human beings are being physically and sexually abused at borders, threatened and kept in camps indefinitely. Children are often left alone, unprotected, and deprived of an education and a future.

What the EU border police is doing to vulnerable women, men and children is a crime and it cannot go unpunished.

If Europe does not act now, it will soon become a place where violence against "the other" is acceptable. This has happened many times before in recent history, and humanity at large suffered its consequences. Europe should learn from its past mistakes, and this time make sure it's on the right side of history.

https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/metoo-fortress-europe-borders-180905074913780.html


Simple... Don't go to Europe as refugees.
 
Syrian boys are working the streets as prostitutes in Greece and possibly more countries. And this.

Europe is rediscovering its rapefugee roots. They are barbarians and worse.

When asked why don't Muslim women flee to Europe in greater numbers. The answer: there are sex predators in Europe waiting for them.

The brutal Italian Lega want to burn mosques, sink ships of refugees and kick out all Muslims, in addition to having the option of shooting every Muslim that tries to enter the country. And Muslims were not the first to be targeted by the Lega members filled with hatred for everybody else. They hated the the Southern Italians before and Roma before them. There is a long list of people they hate. Anyone different than them. They are worse than Northern Indians, if that is possible.
 
We have seen how these Croats , Serbs and Europeans behaved in the Bosnia war. Human rights are only on paper in their world. The only thing they respect is the devil and all the bad things the devil stands for.

Lanaat on the Muslims who fell prey to the Kafir wars and created these refugees. May Allah give them protection and help them achieve peace and tranquility.
 
Syrian boys are working the streets as prostitutes in Greece and possibly more countries. And this.

Europe is rediscovering its rapefugee roots. They are barbarians and worse.

When asked why don't Muslim women flee to Europe in greater numbers. The answer: there are sex predators in Europe waiting for them.

The brutal Italian Lega want to burn mosques, sink ships of refugees and kick out all Muslims, in addition to having the option of shooting every Muslim that tries to enter the country. And Muslims were not the first to be targeted by the Lega members filled with hatred for everybody else. They hated the the Southern Italians before and Roma before them. There is a long list of people they hate. Anyone different than them. They are worse than Northern Indians, if that is possible.

What's wrong with Northern Indians?

Syrian boys are working the streets as prostitutes in Greece and possibly more countries. And this.
Europe is rediscovering its rapefugee roots. They are barbarians and worse.

When asked why don't Muslim women flee to Europe in greater numbers. The answer: there are sex predators in Europe waiting for them.

The brutal Italian Lega want to burn mosques, sink ships of refugees and kick out all Muslims, in addition to having the option of shooting every Muslim that tries to enter the country. And Muslims were not the first to be targeted by the Lega members filled with hatred for everybody else. They hated the the Southern Italians before and Roma before them. There is a long list of people they hate. Anyone different than them. They are worse than Northern Indians, if that is possible.

Are you surprised?:-


WORLD NEWS
SEPTEMBER 7, 2018 / 5:22 AM / 2 DAYS AGO
Can the pope's accusers force him to resign?

Philip Pullella

VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Calls by a Roman Catholic archbishop and his conservative backers for Pope Francis to resign could make it difficult, if not impossible, for him to do so, Church experts say.

Pope Francis waves as he leaves after the Wednesday general audience in Saint Peter's square at the Vatican, September 5, 2018. REUTERS/Max Rossi
Canon (Church) Law says a pope can resign but the decision must be taken freely. In 2013, Francis’s predecessor, Benedict, became the first pontiff in six centuries to resign.

Benedict, then 85, abdicated because he said he no longer had the strength to run the Church. Unlike now, no-one had publicly demanded his resignation, which was a surprise even to top Vatican officials.

HOW DID THE VATICAN AND THE POPE GET TO THIS POINT?
In an 11-page statement published on Aug. 26, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, the former Vatican ambassador to Washington, launched an unprecedented broadside by a Church insider against the pope and a long list of Vatican and U.S. Church officials.

He said that soon after the pontiff’s election in 2013, he told Francis that Theodore McCarrick, the former archbishop of Washington, D.C., had engaged in sexual misconduct.

He said the pope did nothing and even lifted sanctions that had been imposed on McCarrick by Benedict, the former pope.

Critics of Vigano say his statement has holes and contradictions. They say McCarrick disregarded any sanctions, appearing in public often, even alongside Benedict, in the years after Vigano says the former pope sanctioned McCarrick. Vigano stands by his accusations.

Vigano, who is in hiding and communicating exclusively through reporters for conservative media outlets who helped him prepare, edit and distribute the statement, says there is a “homosexual network” in the Vatican that promotes the advancement of gays in the Church.

His statement included no supporting documents.

In July, after U.S. Church officials said there was evidence that McCarrick, 88, had sexually abused a minor more than 50 years ago, Francis sacked him as cardinal and ordered him to live the rest of his life in seclusion, prayer and penitence. Francis’ defenders say he took strict action against McCarrick while Benedict had not.

Francis told reporters on his plane returning from Ireland that he would “not say one word” about Vigano’s accusations. “Read the document carefully and judge it for yourselves. It speaks for itself,” he said.

WHAT IS THE GENESIS OF THE CURRENT CONSERVATIVE ESCALATION?



Pope Francis waves as he leaves after the Wednesday general audience in Saint Peter's square at the Vatican, September 5, 2018. REUTERS/Max Rossi
Since his election in 2013, conservatives have sharply criticised Francis, saying he has left many faithful confused by pronouncements that the Church should be more welcoming to homosexuals and divorced Catholics and not be obsessed by “culture war” issues such as abortion.

Their attacks on the pope hit a new level with Vigano’s broadside. Much of the drama has been played out in newspapers and social media, part of what has become an often shrill proxy war between Francis’ defenders and Vigano’s allies, who back his call for the pope to step down.

WHAT DOES CANON LAW SAY ABOUT PAPAL RESIGNATIONS?
Canon 332, paragraph two, states:

“If it should happen that the Roman Pontiff resigns his office, it is required for validity that he makes the resignation freely and that it be duly manifested but not that it be accepted by anyone.”

Canon lawyers say much hinges on the interpretation of the word “freely” and whether the demands being made by the pope’s fiercest critics has constituted enough of a climate of duress to put its validity into doubt.

WHAT DO CANON LAW EXPERTS SAY?
“The pope has the right to freely resign. That’s what the canon says. The doubt is whether the situation Francis is in now really allows for a free choice because there is a political faction in the Church trying to force it,” said Nicholas Cafardi, former dean of Duquesne University School of Law.

“I don’t see how (the pope can resign freely) when you have people campaigning for it,” said Cafardi, who is also a former member of the Board of Governors of the Canon Law Society of America.

Kurt Martens, professor of canon law at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C., agreed.

“I think were are getting to the point of it becoming impossible because the pressure on him is so intense psychologically that it would be impossible to withstand and therefore it would be invalid,” Martens said.

A Rome-based canon lawyer, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of his position in the Church, said he believed a resignation could be possible but that “it would be very complicated and hairy” and its validity hotly contested because some would see it as a result of duress.

Edward Peters, a conservative canon lawyer based in Detroit, has said on his blog that Francis should not be considered any different to other bishops who canon law says should resign for just or grave causes. The pope is also bishop of Rome.

But some experts also say two former popes (Benedict and Francis) would be just too much for Catholics to digest and would confuse the faithful.


Father Raymond de Souza, a widely read conservative commentator based in Canada, said it would be wrong to treat “the papal office as something worldly than can be relinquished under adverse circumstances”.

WHAT DOES CANON LAW SAY ABOUT PAPAL CONTESTERS?
Canon 1373 says one “who publicly either stirs up hostilities or hatred among subjects against (a pope) ... is to be punished by an interdict or by other just penalties”.

Cafardi said: “I think they (the harshest papal critics) are violating it (canon 1373) or are very close to violating it because of the hate they are trying to stir up against Francis”.

CAN A POPE BE DEPOSED?
Not these days. He can die in office or resign of his own free will. There is no impeachment procedure for a pope.

But Church history is nothing if not colourful. At the start of the 15th century there were three men claiming to be the true pope, each backed by political powers in Europe and Church factions. The Council of Constance, which ran from 1414 to 1418, deposed two of them and the third abdicated.

Editing by Timothy Heritage

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.





MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA
SEPTEMBER 8, 2018 / 2:00 AM / UPDATED 12 HOURS AGO
Egypt sentences 75 to death, hundreds to jail over 2013 sit-in

Haitham Ahmed, John Davison
4 MIN READ


CAIRO (Reuters) - An Egyptian court sentenced 75 people to death on Saturday including prominent Islamist leaders Essam al-Erian and Mohamed Beltagi over a 2013 sit-in which ended with security forces killing hundreds of protesters.


Egyptian photojournalist Mahmoud Abu Zeid, also known as Shawkan, looks on behind a fence during his trial in Cairo, Egypt, September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Shokry Hussein
The sentencing, which included jail terms for more than 600 others, concluded a mass trial of people accused of murder and inciting violence during the pro-Muslim Brotherhood protest at Rabaa Adawiya square in Cairo.

The decision can be appealed within 60 days.

Rabaa square was the single most deadly incident in unrest which followed the 2011 popular uprising that toppled Egypt’s longtime leader Hosni Mubarak.

SPONSORED



ADVERTISING
It occurred weeks after the military ousted Egypt’s first freely elected head of state, Islamist president Mohamed Mursi.

The government says many protesters were armed and that eight members of the security forces were killed.

Rights groups say more than 800 protesters died. Amnesty International condemned Saturday’s decision, calling the trial “disgraceful”.

Those sentenced to jail included a U.S. citizen, Moustafa Kassem, rights group Pretrial Rights International said. Washington is Cairo’s closest Western ally and one of its top aid donors.

President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi on Saturday met U.S. Central Command chief General Joseph Votel as the two countries launched a joint military exercise off Egypt’s Mediterranean coast.



Egyptian photojournalist Mahmoud Abu Zeid, also known as Shawkan, smokes cigarette behind a fence during his trial in Cairo, Egypt, September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Shokry Hussein
In Saturday’s hearing at the vast Tora prison complex south of Cairo, a criminal court sentenced to death by hanging several prominent Islamists including senior Brotherhood leaders al-Erian and Beltagi and preacher Safwat Higazi.

Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Mohamed Badie and dozens more were given life sentences, judicial sources said. Others received jail sentences ranging from five to 15 years.

Cases were dropped against five people who died while in prison, judicial sources said.

Following weeks of protests against the ouster of Islamist President Mursi by the military, which at the time was led by current president Sisi, security forces violently broke up the Rabaa square demonstration.

They arrested hundreds of people who were charged with inciting violence, murder and organising illegal protests.

‘MOCKERY OF JUSTICE’
Rights groups have criticised the trial for including many peaceful protesters and journalists.

An award-winning photographer who covered the protests, Mahmoud Abu Zeid, was sentenced to five years in jail, but would soon be released because his five years in detention during the trial are counted towards the sentence, judicial sources said.

Abu Zeid, also known as Shawkan, was awarded a UN World Press Freedom Prize this year. He was charged with belonging to a banned group and possessing firearms.

“We condemn today’s verdict in the strongest terms,” Amnesty International said in a statement. “The fact that not a single police officer has been brought to account ... shows what a mockery of justice this trial was.”



Egyptian photojournalist Mahmoud Abu Zeid, also known as Shawkan, looks on behind a fence during his trial in Cairo, Egypt, September 8, 2018. REUTERS/Shokry Hussein
Since Sisi was elected president in 2014, authorities have justified a crackdown on dissent and freedoms as being directed at militants and saboteurs trying to undermine the state.

Death sentences have been handed down to hundreds of his political opponents on charges such as belonging to an illegal organisation or planning to carry out an attack. Often the sentences are not carried out, but rights groups say hangings have increased in recent years, with dozens taking place each year.

For executions to take place, Sisi must issue a final approval.

Supporters say a security crackdown is needed to stabilise Egypt, which still faces an Islamist insurgency in the Sinai Peninsula and is reeling financially from years of unrest.

Critics say the erosion of freedoms and silencing of political opponents is the worst Egypt has seen in its modern history.


Additional reporting by Stephanie Nebehay in Geneve; editing by Helen Popper and Js

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
SPONSORED


SPONSORED

SPONSORED




#TOMORRROWSEUROPE
JULY 4, 2018 / 8:17 AM / 2 MONTHS AGO
Evolution not revolution: Financial services of the future

Brought to you byBarclays Corporate Banking
6 MIN READ

The story surrounding the banking battle to keep customers happy, as challenges emerge from FinTechs, is not a new one. However, Barclays is embracing this competition – not to mention the other winds of change, such as Brexit and new regulation across Europe.


Rules and regulations are fundamental to the trade or transport of goods and services in the European Union. With Brexit on the horizon, there is much talk of ‘frictionless trade’. But what about financial services – and FinTech specifically? Host Paul Henley welcomes Susanne Chishti, CEO & Founder of Fintech Circle & Co-editor of ‘The FinTech Book’, and Martin Griffiths, Barclays' Head of FinTech, to discuss these key points and more.
Collaboration over competition


Barclays’ recent strategic partnership with PayPal is indicative of the continuing evolution, rather than the need for total revolution. It gives consumers and business customers a new, seamless way of linking their two accounts. It’s an example of how banks can transform and make their trusted brands stronger, wherein banking experience and innovation are key – this evolution isn’t a full-on collision with large technology companies.

Banks are part of the solution

“FinTechs still need banking payment rails. It’s not in their interest to completely destroy banks. There is still a need for them to be part of the solution. The more we look at collaboration, innovation will enable us to thrive alongside FinTechs,” says Martin Griffiths, Head of FinTech at Barclays. He adds, “There will be new business models – maybe it won’t be all about payments. We’ve got to be open to thinking about what consumers need, what the experience is that the end users want.”

Trust, above all

As established financial services companies strive to stay relevant in a disruptive world, FinTech start-ups would do well to draw on the histories of these corporations and learn how to build businesses that last. Security, privacy and compliance — these are core issues that are hard to replicate. “Consumers trust banks and until some of these businesses have the same scale and the same level of trust, they’re not going to be looked at as the first alternative for most consumers, for quite some time. I think the crypto space is seeing that. Who do you turn to when things go wrong? The banks have got a longstanding reputation for servicing problems,” according to Barclays’ Martin Griffiths.


The millennial wallet

Interestingly, this desire for experience and trust over the latest piece of tech is seen in Telstra’s global research on millennials (aged 18-34). It found that Barclays Bank has the largest proportion of millennials among its customer base. This is significant because this demographic now makes up one third of the world’s population and within ten years it will have overtaken Gen X (aged mid-50s) as the primary source of profit for institutions.

An open future

So, as financial service providers look to woo new audiences and explore new partnerships, the future for FinTechs and banks alike looks exciting. Rather than seeing PSD2 and open banking regulation as a threat, Barclays sees it as an opportunity to innovate and build on our existing products. “PSD2 should accelerate the European FinTech sector – depending on the transposition of how banks themselves interpret it. We’ve been very supportive of it and have been preparing for it for quite a while,” adds Griffiths.

Brexit – and beyond


Another change businesses from all sectors have been preparing for is Brexit. Many are planning for the worst and hoping for the best. Barclays is building a pan-European platform so it can adapt to whatever new regulatory framework there may be, according to Griffiths. He says: “Businesses want to get access to consumers and they’ll go where the business is. And the regulation that’s been around has made it difficult for certain businesses to thrive. With open banking, that’s starting to change. And there is definitely room for growth. The key issues are regulation and the transposition of regulation. If we get clear and sensible regulation then it will enable that market to thrive.”

There is a paradigm shift happening in banking and financial services as a whole. Of that, there can be no doubt. While no-one can reliably predict how the sector will be structured in the future, banks that digitally adapt, stay nimble – and above all, put customers first – will win in the long-run.

To find out more about how Barclays can support your business across Europe, visit:barclayscorporate.com/Europe

The Reuters editorial and news staff had no role in the production of this content. It was created by Reuters Plus, part of the commercial advertising group. To work with Reuters Plus, contact us here.

All quotes delayed a minimum of 15 minutes. See here for a complete list of exchanges and delays.

© 2018 Reuters. All Rights Reserved.

ABOUT COOKIES ON THE SITE
We use cookies to personalize and enhance your experience on our site. Visit our Privacy Policy for more information on our data collection practices. By clicking Accept, you agree to our use of cookies for the purposes listed in our Cookie Consent Tool.
 
I have only one question - why all those people so desperate to move to Europe? If you are not welcome there - stay at home or move to your co-belivers lands.

If you come to my house and steal my shit, maybe 10 years down the line, I will come to your house to steal yours. Understand?
 
Oh no! They were not nice with the illegal criminals trying to enter Europe illegally.
 
If you come to my house and steal my shit, maybe 10 years down the line, I will come to your house to steal yours. Understand?
Understand.
In that case - no offense, but I will shoot you and all coming with you. Because you are not coming to steal my goods. You coming to live in my house, make sex with my woman and eat my food.
 
Last edited:
Understand.
In that case - no offense, but I will shoot you and all coming with you. Because you are not coming to steal my goods. You coming to live in my house, make sex with my woman and eat my food.

Didn't you fucks try this in Afghanistan? We taught you proper lesson. Always remember this lesson ruski.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom