What's new

Ray Dalio Says U.S. Needs a Dose of China’s Common Prosperity

beijingwalker

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 4, 2011
Messages
65,195
Reaction score
-55
Country
China
Location
China
Ray Dalio Says U.S. Needs a Dose of China’s Common Prosperity
Bei Hu, Bloomberg News
ray-dalio.jpg

January 11 2022


(Bloomberg) -- Ray Dalio, founder of the $150 billion investment firm Bridgewater Associates, urged countries including the U.S. to narrow their wealth gaps, while praising China’s drive for common prosperity.

President Xi Jinping’s push helps redistribute wealth and opportunities more equally among its population, allowing the economy to draw upon a wider talent pool, Dalio said at a UBS Group AG investment conference on Monday. The campaign is often misunderstood by international investors, who fear the country is returning to the communist model under Chairman Mao Zedong, he added.

“First you get rich, then you make a point of distributing those opportunities in a more equal way,” Dalio, known as a long-time China enthusiast, said via video link. “The U.S., through its own system, needs more common prosperity, and a lot of other countries do.”

Dalio’s comments come as his support for the nation and its government recently brought criticism from politicians and caused tension with his own former chief executive officer, David McCormick, who’s considering a Senate run. In China, the move to address the country’s wide and persistent wealth gap has involved regulators targeting the tech sector in particular, alarming investors.

Authorities are also trying to rein in what the government sees as the excesses of society, including rabid celebrity fandom, academic cram schools and video gaming. The MSCI China Index slumped nearly 23% last year, the worst decline since 2008, with investor concerns about the political and regulatory environment compounded by Covid-19.


For almost 40 years, Dalio has spoken of his fascination with China, and has been a vocal -- and at times controversial -- booster of the nation and its government. In 1995, Dalio sent his son Matt, then 11, to live and attend school in Beijing for a year.

Talent Generation

“You don’t know where the top talent is going to come from. It’s just as likely to come from poor people, disadvantaged people as it is from the most superbly groomed people,” Dalio said of the Chinese leadership’s common prosperity drive. “So you draw upon that talent, and you make a better economy more prosperous and you create a fairer system.”

China’s relentless regulatory crackdown has divided Wall Street, fueling speculation about where the axe might fall next. George Soros has criticized Xi’s policies and said in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last year that “pouring billions of dollars into China now is a tragic mistake.” Guggenheim Partners’ global chief investment officer Scott Minerd said in October that China is “uninvestable.”

By contrast, Dalio said the U.S. is a more risky place to invest, using criteria such as an economy’s income generation versus expenses, assets versus liabilities, as well as a country’s internal order and likelihood of external conflicts.

“What we see by most of those is that the U.S is encountering more of those risky elements, also other things like education levels, competitive advantages and so on are on decline,” he said. While technology is still a bright spot for the U.S., the rate of change is slower than China, he added.

Bridgewater has been managing Chinese state money since 1993, including about $5 billion for the sovereign wealth fund China Investment Corp. and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange.

In November, Bridgewater raised 8 billion yuan ($1.3 billion) for a new private fund in China, making it the largest global hedge fund player in the country.

Dalio caused a stir at home with his China comments in a Nov. 30 CNBC interview, leading McCormick to tell staff he disagreed with the billionaire’s views.

“Should I not invest in the United States because of our own human rights issues and other things?” Dalio said at the time. “As a top-down country,” he added of China, “they behave like a strict parent.”

 
.
naah, too late; not the "democratic" way...
 
.
After all Chinese is still a communist country, she can't tolerate the rich and poor gap becoming too big.
 
.
Ray Dalio: billionaire who bet on China and is getting richer and richer.

K.y.le B@ss: bet against China, lost everything and is now being investigated by the SEC.
 
.
While he correctly identifies the biggest problem in the US, there is no hope to get it fixed as the deep state refuses to conduct any wealth redistribution at scale.

Remember the Evegrande crisis happens in a background that Chinese Government intentionally suppresses property prices with President Xi's famous quote "houses are for living in, not for speculation". Ask yourself if any western governments can do things like that?

Even worse that the US has much inferior health care insurance scheme and student loan programs than any other developed countries. By continuously sending troops overseas in a bid to contain China and Russia, the US is bleeding every day. However, the deep state doesn't really care and keep launching propaganda campaigns against China and Russia. In doing all of those, the Americans are losing the global competition and the impact will be extraordinarily significant.
 
.
(Bloomberg) -- Ray Dalio, founder of the $150 billion investment firm Bridgewater Associates, urged countries including the U.S. to narrow their wealth gaps,

:unsure:
Sure Ray..you first of course...lead by example..instead of asking others who are worth nowhere close to you to step up to the plate.


#36 Ray Dalio
Founder & Co-Chief Investment Officer, Bridgewater Associates
$20Billion
REAL TIME NET WORTH
as of 1/10/22
 
Last edited:
. . .
:unsure:
Sure Ray..you first of course...lead by example..instead of asking others who are worth nowhere close to you to step up to the plate.


#36 Ray Dalio
Founder & Co-Chief Investment Officer, Bridgewater Associates
$20Billion
REAL TIME NET WORTH
as of 1/10/22

That's not how it works. There will always be an excuse against wealth equality no matter who says it:

1. Billionaire says it. You say, "what a hypocrite, you first."

2. Middle class says it. You say, "you're just not working hard enough."

3. Poor say it. You say, "you're just jealous of the rich, if you were rich you wouldn't care."

Conclusion: you are always right by default. LMAO
 
.
That's not how it works.

Why not?

If somebody says we should all cut down on greenhouse gases we emit into the environment because it is destroying the planet and we find out they are personally guilty of having a ten million acre ranch with 2 million heads of methane producing cattle shouldn't we be asking them why they aren't themselves doing what they are asking others to do? Considering they are a standout emitter.
 
Last edited:
.
America has a lot of people that need help to be rehabilitated, not given free money. People with drug issues, mental health issues, medical problems, and general poverty. Also people that need technical education to increase their skill level so they can fill in more jobs.

Gainful Employment is better then charity for most people, IMHO.

This is what Build back better was suppose to do; employ more people in jobs like home health aide and child care, so through earnings people could raise their standard of living.

the infrastructure bill will get a lot of construction works projects for the next 5-10 years, to fix a third of the backlog of projects.

the government should incentivize public private partnerships to cover the remaining 2-3 trillion in infrastructure needs, and also employ as many people as possible. For example, the housing backlog that artificially keeps housing prices high, or the large amount of debt for useless degrees students get from many universities.

Taxpayers also need to see a benefit, or else they will drop out of the workforce and the tax base. Keeping people busy rebuilding America and allowing market forces to work, lowering the cost of living, and will help heal the nation.
 
.
Why not?

If somebody says we should all cut down on greenhouse gases we emit into the environment because it is destroying the planet and we find out they are personally guilty of having a ten million acre ranch with 2 million heads of methane producing cattle shouldn't we be asking them why they aren't themselves doing what they are asking others to do? Considering they are a standout emitter.

But if someone living in a city walking everywhere said it you'll say "lol urban poor is jealous of my rich suburban lifestyle if he had my money he wouldn't care about global warming"
 
. .
But if someone living in a city walking everywhere said it you'll say "lol urban poor is jealous of my rich suburban lifestyle if he had my money he wouldn't care about global warming"

At $20Billion and this guy is ranked at #36 on the Forbes super rich list and he is saying we should all be doing more to fix income equality? Isn't the issue more like the top .01% skewing the numbers?

If we simply took away all their money the problem would probably be solved. Why even mention the rest of the 99.99% of the population.
 
.
At $20Billion and this guy is ranked at #36 on the Forbes super rich list and he is saying we should all be doing more to fix income equality? Isn't the issue more like the top .01% skewing the numbers?

If we simply took away all their money the problem would probably be solved. Why even mention the rest of the 99.99% of the population.

If he wasn't a billionaire: "lol just a jealous urban poor cuz liberals are taking our money and giving it to the illegals! Sanctuary cities and Detroit!"
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom