What's new

Rare images show Pakistan’s tactical nuclear weapons that may be used against Indian troops

ashok321

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
17,942
Reaction score
4
Country
Canada
Location
Malaysia
Rare images show Pakistan’s tactical nuclear weapons that may be used against Indian troops:

https://theprint.in/security/rare-i...ns-that-may-fail-to-stop-indian-troops/45703/


BH2.001-696x522.jpeg




Pakistan has decided to deploy its tactical nuclear weapons in specially prepared garrisons just about 60-80 km from the international boundary.

New Delhi: Pakistan thinks it has compelled India to abandon the ‘Cold Start’ doctrine, i.e. the sudden and swift launch of large scale military action, and has foreclosed all options for a conventional war by operationalising tactical nuclear weapons – nuclear bombs with limited yield that may be used against advancing Indian military columns.

But its calculations may just be flawed.

India has a very clearly drawn out nuclear policy of “No First Use” or NFU. However, details of that policy have been left ambiguous — such as what would be construed as first use. This could be something like Pakistani preparation to launch nuclear weapons, an actual launch of nuclear weapons, or even a crossing over into Indian air space.

Pakistan does not have any written policy on nuclear weapons use, although its leaders have often threatened to use nuclear weapons on the Indian Army’s advancing IABGs (integrated armoured battle groups), either in concentration areas or after crossing the border.

Pakistan’s TNW garrisons
Pakistan has thus decided to deploy its TNWs or tactical nuclear weapons in specially prepared garrisons just about 60-80 km from the international boundary. The present range of Pakistan’s mobile TNW inventory – the Nasr missile – is 60 km. It is designed to be fired from the garrison itself within the shortest possible preparation time.

Pakistan’s two TNW garrisons are located in Gujranwala and Pano Aqil.

Gujranwala

The Gujranwala TNW garrison was constructed between 2011 and 2014. It has two hardened highbay garages (100 m x 20 m) with automated blast doors on the eastern side and a 5 m wide entrance on the west. Both highbay garages are connected with a covered pathway to defence electronics systems storage igloos (15 m x 16 m).

BH2.001.jpeg

Vinayak Bhat/ThePrint
There are eight garages (32 m x 17 m) with five parks each. Six of these garages are connected with AC plants in the rear, suggesting a storage space for 24 tractor erector launchers or TELs with support vehicles.

Five new blast-proof ammunition bunkers (25 m x 18 m) have been constructed with revetments in between during the same period, suggesting a support role for the facility. There are two large support areas with highbay garages for possible repair and maintenance of the weapons, TELs and support vehicles.

BH3.001.jpeg

Vinayak Bhat/ThePrint
There are command and control, administrative and other support buildings observed at this facility.

A four-layered security has been provided, with the innermost being a solid fence with raised watch towers.

Pano Aqil

The Pano Aqil TNW garrison was constructed at a very slow pace between 2010-2015. This garrison has a single hardened highbay garage with exactly similar size shape and make. It has similar automated blast doors on one side and a 5 m wide entrance on the other. It is connected with a pathway to the DES igloo.

BH4.001.jpeg

Vinayak Bhat/ThePrint
There are nine garages at this facility, slightly larger (40 m x 18 m) than Gujranwala. It also has a support area with a highbay garage, command and control, and other administrative buildings. It also has five additional ammunition bunkers with exactly the same configuration.

The facility has a large open area, suggesting that some expansion has been planned for this facility in the future. The size of the garages indicate the possible expansion will be larger TELs, possibly that of Abdali or Ghaznavi.

BH5.001.jpeg

Vinayak Bhat/ThePrint
A similar four-layered security has been provided, with the innermost being a solid fence with raised watch towers within visual contact of each other.

‘Cold Start’ is still tenable
Pakistan believes that since the gap at the tactical level has been plugged by the Nasr missile systems, all avenues of conventional war are blocked by denying operational space. Thus, India’s ‘Cold Start’ doctrine becomes untenable.

Pakistan perceives that ‘Cold Start’ will entail 8-9 IABGs capturing either large territory, something that would cross Pakistan’s nuclear threshold and invite “one odd” tactical nuclear weapon use. And, that India will not be able to use “massive retaliation” to counter one such strike due to international pressure.

Pakistan seems to have deployed at least 24-36 launchers with Nasr missiles. Although Nasr missiles are dual use, there is a need to count 36×4 warheads (each launcher with four missiles), instead of merely 36 warheads. This deployment indicates Pakistan’s perception of ‘Indian Cold Start’ targets priority as Shakargarh Bulge and Thar Desert.

This concept for stategic deterrence is, however, flawed. Indian formations can easily reach the strike distance of 80 km that includes Nasr garrisons. Pakistan could be underestimating the resilience of the Indian leadership.
 
. .
Lets hope it never comes to Nukes but any smaller country would do everything to keep minimum deterrence against a much larger foe in both numbers and weapons.
 
. . . . . .
If there is a mass killing of Indian soldiers by way of any Pakistani tactile nuke exploding on them, Modi government would lose its ground forever. Sensing this, Modi would never ever be aggressive towards Pakistan, just to save his chair.

The last time Pakistan blasted Indian outpost with Bhaktar Shikan ATGM and killed 5 Indian soldiers (captain included) India could not retaliate in any meaningful way.

If Modi government goes....Its all peace in the region.

Pakistan has China's tacit support.
 
.
Yeh raj47 chu**ya marwaega apni chu**tic khabron se.. yeh jang kar wa ke chhoray ga.
 
.
Pakistan could be underestimating the resilience of the Indian leadership.

:lol:


-------

Pakistan will love to turn India into waste land...target would be cities aka economic centers plus important villages.

Indian leadership won't start war...Unless they get totally ready for China...which is not the case right now.

Chicken neck is lying quite closet to Dragon...while Pakistan is conducting tests - modifying nukes and conventional armory.

Indians are not ready to pay the price...hence won't start war.

CSD was just to push Pakistan on back foot...too dangerous to act on...considering the heat/emotions involved b/w two blood enemies, one miscalculation and it ends everything in sub continent.
 
.
Nuking Indian troops is not desirable, I hope saner elements will take over any escalation if there is a possibility of war.
 
.
With the 2 front war warning coming every now and then from frivolous Indian brigadier, Pakistan has upped its ante and I don't blame Pakistan for rolling up its sleeves to take the bull by the horns.
 
. .
If there is a mass killing of Indian soldiers by way of any Pakistani tactile nuke exploding on them, Modi government would lose its ground forever. Sensing this, Modi would never ever be aggressive towards Pakistan, just to save his chair.

The last time Pakistan blasted Indian outpost with Bhaktar Shikan ATGM and killed 5 Indian soldiers (captain included) India could not retaliate in any meaningful way.

If Modi government goes....Its all peace in the region.

Pakistan has China's tacit support.

This is not about Modi.

This is about a permanent state of turbulence on the borders. A situation that has only got more intense every year since 1989. Those is no sign of reversal, not over the entire period, leaving aside temporary respite immediately after the events of 1999, when there was a sudden realisation that India would not flinch at bloody sacrifices.

Your remarks in your last four lines are utterly stupid and meaningless. Modi staying or going has nothing to do with the permanent unrest on the borders, only with Indian responses. As long as he is there, matters will remain uncertain; there is no guarantee that his departure will bring in more peace, quite the contrary.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom