Quran, Sunnah, Hadis, defined by top scholar

[BATMAN]

A simple explanation:

 

[Yaseen1]

it is better you stay away from such type of scholars who themselves are not on right path

 

[Xestan]

He's a scholar we need but not the one we deserve right now. People will realise what we missed after he's long gone.

 

[Sinnerman108]

Thread reported,
Ban is coming.
@Oscar

 

[S.Y.A]

A simple explanation:

LOL! he is not a scholar. just a revisionist who wants to change what he doesnt like.

 

[BATMAN]

LOL! he is not a scholar. just a revisionist who wants to change what he doesnt like.

what lol... what's funny in his definition? Do you have disagreement?

who else have problem with the definition, given in OP. Scholar or not.

Thread reported,
Ban is coming.
@Oscar

reported on what basis? and why specially requested to Oscar? Does he also not like him?

it is better you stay away from such type of scholars who themselves are not on right path

He doesn't hurt me, than why should i stay away from him.

 

[Genghis khan1]

People who compare Hadith with Quran are gravely mistaken. Hadiths were written 200 years after prophet (s.a.w) death.

 

[S.Y.A]

what lol... what's funny in his definition? Do you have disagreement?

who else have problem with the definition, given in OP. Scholar or not.

The idiot just relegated Hadith to mere history.

People who compare Hadith with Quran are gravely mistaken. Hadiths were written 200 years after prophet (s.a.w) death.

nope. incorrect assumption. Ashaab e suffa used to write down Hadith. people like Ibn Abbas RA, Ibn Masood RA and Ibn Umar RA had their own collections, and taught those to their students. What came 200 years later was an attempt to compile all of those separate collections into one place.

 

[Genghis khan1]

The idiot just relegated Hadith to mere history.


nope. incorrect assumption. Ashaab e suffa used to write down Hadith. people like Ibn Abbas RA, Ibn Masood RA and Ibn Umar RA had their own collections, and taught those to their students. What came 200 years later was an attempt to compile all of those separate collections into one place.

Allah send his book (Quran) for Guidance. On the day of Judgement you will not be Questioned about Bukhari, Muslim or other books. Use them as references but never ever compare, argue or undermine anything in Quran because of any Hadith. I have seen Alh Hadith people doing such thing. They lose their faith following their brain washed molvis.

 

[S.Y.A]

Allah send his book (Quran) for Guidance. On the day of Judgement you will not be Questioned about Bukhari, Muslim or other books. Use them as references but never ever compare, argue or undermine anything in Quran because of any Hadith. I have seen Alh Hadith people doing such thing. They lose their faith following their brain washed molvis.

I am not doing that. In all orthodox Sunni schools (Ahle Hadith are a new thing), Hadith are secondary to Quran, and used to expand upon the teachings and rulings in Quran (like the tafseer, or how to implement different rulings of Hadd). Sunnah and Hadith arent there to undermine the Quran.

 

[BATMAN]

The idiot just relegated Hadith to mere history.

Dude you started with lol and now you are addressing him idiot.
You are swinging between opposite poles!

I am not doing that. In all orthodox Sunni schools (Ahle Hadith are a new thing), Hadith are secondary to Quran, and used to expand upon the teachings and rulings in Quran (like the tafseer, or how to implement different rulings of Hadd). Sunnah and Hadith arent there to undermine the Quran.

Where can we find copy of original Hadith, written by the author?

 

[LeGenD]

LOL! he is not a scholar. just a revisionist who wants to change what he doesnt like.

Categorization of hadith into Sahih, Hasan, Da'if, Mawdu, and Maqlub, was also revisionism.

Ever wonder why hadith is subject to revisionism through the ages whereas Holy Quran is intact?

Something is amiss, right? Yes, your homework.

 

[S.Y.A]

Categorization of hadith into Sahih, Hasan, Da'if, Mawdu, and Maqlub, was also revisionism.

Ever wonder why hadith is subject to revisionism through the ages whereas Holy Quran is intact?

Something is amiss, right? Yes, your homework.

no it wasnt revisionism. it is sifting fact from fiction. finding out the original hadith from all the noise.

something is amiss. and it is your knowledge.

Where can we find copy of original Hadith, written by the author?

Find me the original Quran written down by the scribes in the time of the Holy Prophet.

Dude you started with lol and now you are addressing him idiot.
You are swinging between opposite poles!

The Lol was also directed at the idiot.

 

[LeGenD]

no it wasnt revisionism. it is sifting fact from fiction. finding out the original hadith from all the noise.

something is amiss. and it is your knowledge.

Categorization of hadith under any logic starting with Sahih Bukhari, was/is technically revisionism.

True or False - who get to decide this and on what grounds? An Islamic studies scholar, right?

Well, Javed Ahmad Ghamidi is also an Islamic studies scholar.

Find me the original Quran written down by the scribes in the time of the Holy Prophet.

Not sure about that but people do have something really close: https://www.livescience.com/51638-quran-manuscript-oldest-known-copy.html

 

[Ghareeb_Da_Baal]

LOL! he is not a scholar. just a revisionist who wants to change what he doesnt like.

exactly. he has opened up some center here in Dallas too.
#discomolvi. Says he does not believe in the reemergence of Jesus and emergence of Imam Mahdi and then he counters the criticism offered merely by saying that this is what he believes and the opposer is free to believe his own point of view. Doesn't sound very scholarly.