What's new

Qazi Family vs Qatari Prince - Who is lying ?

Realistic Change

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 5, 2013
Messages
1,260
Reaction score
2
Qazi vs Qatari - who is lying?

http://dailytimes.com.pk/pakistan/2...itish-pakistani-officer-jumps-into-panamagate

After Qatari prince, son of British-Pakistani officer jumps into Panamagate
‘Sharif family bought Mayfair flats through money laundering and on my father’s name’
after-qatari-prince-son-of-british-pakistani-officer-jumps-into-panamagate-1c5cef99c16ba4ce0f13452caeaa1608.jpg


ISLAMABAD: After the Qatari prince, son of a British-Pakistani officer has jumped in the Panamagate, claiming that the Sharif family bought Mayfair flats through money laundering. He said the illegal money was transferred in the bank accounts opened on his father name without any consent.

Kashif Masood, son of Masood Ahmed Qazi, a retired officer from London Stock Exchange, through a letter, said that his father was bluffed by Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, who opened accounts in the name of Masood Qazi, the author’s father.

Unlike Qatari prince, the British son has consented to appear before the larger bench of the apex court, hearing Panama leaks case, in order to record his statement and testimony with more “substantial” evidences.

“I am a concerned Pakistani and to support the Supreme Court of Pakistan in delivering justice, I will send my report and papers. I have more documents and if required, I can appear before the court. The Mayfair homes had been bought through ill-gotten wealth earned through corrupt practices,” the letter of the author told Supreme Court.

The 74-page letter was sent to the Registrar of Supreme Court of Pakistan through email, a copy of which is available with Daily Times.

However, it is yet to be decided by the officials of Supreme Court of Pakistan whether the confidential document is admissible or not.

The author of the letter claimed that his family was once in close relations with Finance Minister Ishaq Dar and his father Masood Qazi even sponsored him to pursue his studies of accountancy in UK.

Qazi’s son, in his letter, stated that multiple inquiries have concluded that the bank accounts containing 5 million pounds were set up in the names of three of his members of his family, adding that these deposits were used to raise millions of pounds in loans, which were channeled into Sharif family-owned businesses.

The money was laundered through “fictitious bank accounts” in the names of three members of the Qazi family.

The Qazi family claimed that these accounts were set up - without their knowledge - with the assistance of Ishaq Dar. According to Qazi Family, the accounts were opened using copies of their passports, which they had given to Dar to obtain Pakistani ID cards on their behalf.

The letter stated that in 1992, the Qazi family received the first of a series of statements from the US banks in Lahore, indicating that three family members - Kashif, his mother Sikandra and her daughter-in-law Nuzhat Gohar - had balances totaling five million pounds.

According to Kashif Masood Qazi, about 440 millions moved through the accounts in his family members’ names.

The letter cited the UK government official documents mentioning details of these flats and their ownership since 1993.

The letter stated that the offshore companies, Nielsen and Nescoll, owned these Park Lane London flats since 1993. The author asked as to how the Sharif family pledged the flats with a UK bank in 1995 to obtain a financial facility without owning the offshore companies?

The 74-letter also cited notices of different banks, including Al Faysal Bank Limited, Atlas BOT Investment Bank Limited and Bank of America, Lahore, opened on name of Qazi family, calling for repayment of the loans taken for financially facilitating Hamza Board Mills Limited, Chaudhary Sugar Mills Limited, Hudabiya Engineers Private Limited Company and Mayfair flats.

Earlier, Qatari prince Hamad Bin Jassim Bin Jaber Al-Thani had submitted an affidavit, saying that the Mayfair flats were gifted to Sharif Family by his father.
 
.
“I am a concerned Pakistani and to support the Supreme Court of Pakistan in delivering justice, I will send my report and papers. I have more documents and if required, I can appear before the court. The Mayfair homes had been bought through ill-gotten wealth earned through corrupt practices,” the letter of the author told Supreme Court.
Oh maaaaan.......... :woot: so is this the evidence IK was talking about?
@Zibago @django @Hell hound
 
. . .
He is a PTI supporter who is not only insulting royal family of Pakistan but Qatar as well :omghaha:
 
.
Just leave all reasons & rhymes and logics aside in this plain black & white case.

I am impressed at the credibility of the new "guarantor" of Sharif's

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ormer-billionaire-pm-questioned-in-high-court

- Now we are told that PM was lying on the floor of the house when he stated that $33million were goen from sale of Dubai Factory - which was actually liquidated as they defaulted on loan from BCCI lead by syndication.

Simply wow - they better bring the architect (along with Saif ur Rehman) of this whole drama in open who ironically is brother of Asad Umar.

Also, have Sharif's done Google search on Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani before trying to present him as credible.

Can Akram Sheikh make such a blunder - hard to digest ;)

http://www.forbes.com/sites/chloeso...prime-minister-is-a-billionaire/#44932b3925ee

I should ask my former boss (Muneer Kamal - referenced above in bolded and underlined text) to please listen to his brother - Asad Umer and admit how he arranged the funds out of Pakistan - if he does not agree :) which he won't - as he is eyeing Governor SBP position for so long - then I'll respectfully ask him to allow me to submit docs of Daewoo's involvement (in good old Motorway days) and Hudaibia Paper and Hamza Shipping Corporation and others too ;)

-------------------------------------------------------

But knowing and working very closely with a lot of these white color criminals in Pakistan - I can guarantee this dialogue will happen:

Nawaz Sharif: Honorable Chief Justice of Pakistan - I admit, I have done money laundering, I have not paid taxes, I have defrauded banks, I have willfully defaulted, I have evaded tax, I have destroyed several national industries including Shipbreaking Industry in Gadani through SRO's - please convict me.

Supreme Court: Mian Sb - we respect your honesty - but where is saboot?

Nawaz Sharif: I am admitting it myself, is it not good enough?

Supreme Court: No, there are no evidences and since your previous statements also (under oath) do not match, we can not admit your statement as to be truthful- hereby allowing you to go free and plunder more and let us enjoy too - Court is dismissed and so is every future case against Sharif's forever.

And all the beneficiaries of this corrupt system lived happily ever after :)
 
.
However, it is yet to be decided by the officials of Supreme Court of Pakistan whether the confidential document is admissible or not.

Lets see if court will accept this as an evidence.

ابھی کورٹ سوچے گی اس بارے میں کہ قطری شہزادے کا وزن زیادہ ہے یا کاشف مسعود کا

کورٹ نے اس واسطے ایک وزن کرنے کی مشین بھی منگوالی ہے

کاشف مسعود پہلے اس مشین پر کھڑے ہونگے، ان کا وزن نوٹ کیا جائیگا

پھر قطری کا وزن نوٹ کیا جائے گا- قطری کے لئے کورٹ میں مشین پر کھڑے ہونے کی کوئی پابندی نہیں، بس اپنے پاس جو بھی مشین ہو اس پر کھڑا ہوکر اپنے موبائل سے مشین کی تصویر اتار کر ججز کو وہاٹس ایپ کردے

پھر فیصلہ ہوگا کہ کونسی شہادت پر پکوڑے رکھ کر کھائے جائیں


@The Sandman @Realistic Change @Farah Sohail @war&peace @Zibago @epicname @El_Swordsmen

Actually, i liked the interview of Imran. Kashif Masood is another story, what IK has submitted in court is something else. Please watch this short clip:

 
.
Lets see if court will accept this as an evidence.
@PakSword

I also have this question... Will this, also be "THOS SABOOT" for the liking of our honorable court or...will this also be not admissible as evidence? I have my doubts, friends.... Maybe this will also be for raddi ki tokri, on which pakoras should be eaten

ابھی کورٹ سوچے گی اس بارے میں کہ قطری شہزادے کا وزن زیادہ ہے یا کاشف مسعود کا

کورٹ نے اس واسطے ایک وزن کرنے کی مشین بھی منگوالی ہے

کاشف مسعود پہلے اس مشین پر کھڑے ہونگے، ان کا وزن نوٹ کیا جائیگا

پھر قطری کا وزن نوٹ کیا جائے گا- قطری کے لئے کورٹ میں مشین پر کھڑے ہونے کی کوئی پابندی نہیں، بس اپنے پاس جو بھی مشین ہو اس پر کھڑا ہوکر اپنے موبائل سے مشین کی تصویر اتار کر ججز کو وہاٹس ایپ کردے

پھر فیصلہ ہوگا کہ کونسی شہادت پر پکوڑے رکھ کر کھائے جائیں


@The Sandman @Realistic Change @Farah Sohail @war&peace @Zibago @epicname @El_Swordsmen

Actually, i liked the interview of Imran. Kashif Masood is another story, what IK has submitted in court is something else. Please watch this short clip:



Bring whatever evidence, tht can be made available..whether through kashif masood...or this new document, which IK submitted....i think they will not be worth any attention of the court... Un par sirf pakoray hi khaye jasaktay hain... I doubt, whether courts will even want to summon kashif Masood.. Woh us se pehle hi usay raddi ki tokri ka hissa bana dein ge...
 
.
Wait for judgement Dont go on conspiracy theories
When this Case will Finish then give your opinion

Every pakistani knows nawaz is guilty now see what SC will do
wait and Watch
 
. . .
It's the easiest case for any court; but since there is no will there will be no way.

If you just look at the detailed version of Ishaq Dar that he had submitted - it has every character of the story in it; which can be traced 100% - but the main question is; Does Court want to trace it? Answer is - NO!

---------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.thenews.com.pk/archive/print/629782-the-truth-about-rs3.48-bn-sharifs-loan-default

April 09, 2013

ISLAMABAD: The National Accountability Bureau (NAB) desperately awaits the long-overdue judgment in the Rs3.48 billion ‘willful loan default case’ against Nawaz Sharif and his family members concerning the Hudabiya Paper Mills Private Limited.

The case hearing was concluded on December 3, 2012 by a two-member Rawalpindi bench of the Lahore High Court, declaring that the verdict was being reserved to be announced ‘soon’.

The division bench comprising Justice Khwaja Imtiaz Ahmed and Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan had heard for six months three identical petitions filed by Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif and several other family members, seeking cancellation of the corruption cases which were filed against them by the NAB. The cases pertaining to the Hudabiya Mills, Ittefaq Foundries and the Raiwind assets were prepared in 2000 when the Sharifs were detained in the Attock Fort following the overthrow of their government by Musharraf. As the Sharifs eventually proceeded to Saudi Arabia in December 2000 after signing a pardon deal with General Pervez Musharraf, these references were adjourned sine die on April 4, 2001.

The NAB once again took up the pending cases in 2007 as Nawaz Sharif returned home. On August 8, 2007, the NAB filed an application with the Lahore High Court for revival of the pending corruption cases against the Sharifs. But the NAB application was finally thrown out by the Rawalpindi bench of the Lahore High Court in August 2008, maintaining that the cases were not routed through the NAB chairman. Yet another NAB attempt was halted by the court on the same grounds in February 2010. However, on a petition filed by the Sharifs, a division bench of the LHC headed by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah ordered the NAB on October 5, 2011 to return the confiscated assets of the Sharif family, including shares worth Rs100 million, prize bonds worth Rs115 million, documents of properties in Murree, Chaudhry Sugar Mills, Hudabiya Engineering Services, Hamza Shipping Corporation, Ramzan Sugar Mills, etc.

On October 19, 2011, the Rawalpindi bench of the High Court comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Abdul Waheed Khan passed a stay order in favour of the Sharifs and directed an accountability court to stay further proceedings on corruption references. On September 15, 2012, the Rawalpindi bench of the Lahore High Court restrained an accountability court from pursuing the corruption case against the Sharifs till the matter was adjudicated by it. During subsequent hearing of the case on October 9, 2012, the division bench of the LHC, comprising Justice Khwaja Imtiaz Ahmed and Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, advised the counsel for the Sharifs to ask his clients to pay back the decades-old bank loans to get rid of one of the three corruption references.

Justice Khwaja Imtiaz Ahmed told Salman Butt, the counsel for Mian Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif, “The Sharif family seems to have recovered its losses and it is believed that the family is now well-off and can easily return all the loans to the banks. The loans procured from different banks were the public money and it should be returned at the earliest.” On December 3, 2012, Justice Khwaja Imtiaz Ahmed and Justice Farrukh Irfan Khan of the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench reserved its judgment on the Rs3.48 billion ‘willful loan default case’ against the Sharifs concerning the Hudabiya Paper Mills after the NAB prosecutor Chaudhry Riaz Ahmed completed his arguments in the case.

In his arguments, Chaudhry Riaz Ahmed informed the court that there was sufficient material available with the NAB to proceed against the Sharif brothers in the Hudabiya Mills case, especially a hand-statement of Senator Ishaq Dar as the approver wherein he has charged sheeted the Sharifs. Quoting Dar’s statement, Ch Riaz Ahmed said several bogus bank accounts were opened on the instructions of Nawaz Sharif and his brother Shahbaz Sharif, depositing the laundered money and later transferring the money into personal accounts.

In the “State vs Hudabiya Paper Mills Private Limited case”, nine members of the Sharif family were accused of committing money laundering to the tune of Rs642.743 million. As per the NAB reference, the Sharif family allegedly deposited ill-gotten money in fake accounts which were opened in the names of other persons and the money from these accounts was used to pay off the bank loans of the defaulting Sharif companies. Mian Muhammad Sharif, Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif, Abbas Sharif, Hussain Nawaz Sharif, Hamza Shahbaz Sharif, Mrs Shamim Sharif (Nawaz’s mother), Mrs Sabiha Abbas, Mrs Maryam Safdar and the former finance minister of the Sharif cabinet, Ishaq Dar are the main accused in the Hudabiya reference.

While concluding his arguments in the Hudabiya Mills case before a division bench of the LHC on December 3, 2012, the NAB prosecutor Chaudhry Riaz Ahmed narrated in detail the 43-page handwritten statement by Senator Ishaq Dar wherein he had accused the Sharifs of involvement in money laundering. As per the statement, which had been recorded before a District Magistrate, Lahore, on April 25, 2000, Dar accused the Sharif brothers of having used the Hudabiya Paper Mills as cover for money laundering during the late 1990s. Dar’s statement was recorded before a district magistrate in Lahore, after he was brought to the court from a jail by Basharat Shahzad, then serving as assistant director in the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA).

According to a senior NAB official, Ishaq Dar’s deposition was an irrevocable statement because it had been recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Dar happens to be a high-profile PML-N leader who has always been considered close to the Sharif brothers. In fact, Dar’s son, Ali Dar, is married to Nawaz Sharif’s younger daughter, Asma Nawaz. Ishaq Dar confessed in his statement: “I opened two foreign currency accounts in the name of Sikandra Masood Qazi and Talat Masood Qazi with foreign currency funds provided by the Sharif family in the Bank of America by signing as Sikandara Masood Qazi and Talat Masood Qazi. All instructions to the bank in the name of these two persons were signed by me under the orders of original depositors, namely Mian Nawaz Sharif and Mian Shahbaz Sharif. The foreign currency accounts of Nuzhat Gohar and Kashif Masood Qazi were opened in Bank of America by Naeem Mehmood under my instructions (based on the directives of the Sharifs) by signing the same as Nuzhat Gohar and Kashif Masood Qazi.”

As per Dar’s statement recorded before District Magistrate Lahore on April 25, 2000, besides these foreign currency accounts, a previously opened foreign currency account of Saeed Ahmed, a former director of the First Hajvari Modaraba Company and a close aide of Dar, and of Mussa Ghani, the nephew of Dar’s wife, were also used to deposit huge foreign currency funds provided by the Sharif family to offer them as collateral to obtain different direct and indirect credit lines. Dar conceded that the Bank of America, Citibank, Atlas Investment Bank, Al Barka Bank and Al Towfeek Investment Bank were used under the directives of the Sharif family.

Interestingly, Dar also implicated himself by confessing before the magistrate that he — along with his friends Kamal Qureshi and Naeem Mehmood — had opened fake foreign currency accounts in different international banks. Dar said an amount of $3.725 million was transferred in the Emirates Bank, $8.539 million transferred in the Al Faysal Bank (this is the connection that is Muneer Kamal and referenced by Aitzaz Ahsan in his speech on the floor of the house where he said - "I can mention names of those who did it - but I'll leave it here") and $2.622 million were transferred in the accounts of the Hudabiya Paper Mills Ltd. He had concluded his statement by adding that the entire amount deposited in these banks finally landed in the account of the Hudabiya Paper Mills.

However, Senator Ishaq Dar neither denied nor confirmed having given the statement. Approached by The News on April 30, 2011 after Rehman Malik had announced taking up the Hudabiya Mills money laundering case against the Sharif brothers, Ishaq Dar stated: “This is all rubbish. The Hudabiya Mills case is nothing but trash. The matter is sub judice in the Lahore High Court and the facts would be known to the general public in due course. All transactions were duly reported to the State Bank of Pakistan as per the law of the land”.

As the NAB sent details of the Hudabiya Paper Mills case to the Election Commission of Pakistan last week, the PML-N said the NAB’s action was based on mala fide intentions. “The NAB should not do politics and it should refrain from becoming a party”, a PML-N spokesman said. On his part, Shahbaz Sharif addressed a press conference in Lahore with Ishaq Dar sitting next to him, refuting that they defaulted on Rs3.48 billion bank loans. “We never abused political positions to obtain loans and then to default on them. It is a conspiracy by a gang of four to malign the most popular leader in the country while misusing the NAB”.

On the other hand, a NAB spokesman has refuted Shahbaz Sharif’s allegations, saying it was in fact the Election Commission which had sought from the Bureau a complete list of the politicians involved in willful default and plea bargain cases. “The NAB records show the Sharif brothers had petitioned the Lahore High Court, seeking the quashing of the loan default cases pending against them in the accountability courts. And since their petition has not yet been decided by the LHC despite concluding the case hearing and reserving the verdict almost four months ago, the status of the Sharifs remains the same — accused in default cases”.
 
Last edited:
.
اس کل موے پانامے کی وجہ سے جتنا میں نے قانون، قانون شہادت پڑھ لیا ہے، اور جتنا قانون دانوں کی گفتگو سن لی ہے، اتنا پڑھ کر شاید قانون کی سند مل جاتی

مجھ جیسے دو جمع دو چار والے منشی کو قانون شہادت سمجھ آگیا، نہیں آیا تو سپریم کورٹ کے لارجر بینچ کو نہیں آیا
 
.
اس کل موے پانامے کی وجہ سے جتنا میں نے قانون، قانون شہادت پڑھ لیا ہے، اور جتنا قانون دانوں کی گفتگو سن لی ہے، اتنا پڑھ کر شاید قانون کی سند مل جاتی

مجھ جیسے دو جمع دو چار والے منشی کو قانون شہادت سمجھ آگیا، نہیں آیا تو سپریم کورٹ کے لارجر بینچ کو نہیں آیا

true, for me too :D but sad part remains tht....SC ko shayad bhool gaya hai..qanoon e shahadat
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom