What's new

Punjab polls: FM Bilawal warns of ‘martial law, emergency-like situation’ if SC larger bench not formed

Dalit

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
23,669
Reaction score
-12
Country
Pakistan
Location
Netherlands
Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Monday expressed concerns that the country could face a “martial law or an emergency-like situation” due to the constitutional crisis that might occur if the Supreme Court does not constitute a larger bench to hear the PTI’s petition against the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) decision to postpone polls to the Punjab Assembly.

For the past week, a three-member apex court bench — comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar — has been hearing the petition and rejected repeated requests from the coalition government for the formation of a full court bench on the matter. Earlier today, the court reserved its verdict in the case.

“My concern is that if a larger bench is not constituted then such a constitutional crisis will be born that God forbid martial law or emergency-type situation [could be] imposed again on Pakistan,” FM Bilawal said today while talking to media reporters in Larkana today, acknowledging that he was making a “big” statement.

Bilawal, whose media talk came after the top court reserved its verdict, said there was still time for everyone to “come back to their senses”.

He said that the institutions’ conduct should benefit the nation and “for that, it is necessary that our honourable judges form a full court to answer this important question [regarding the election date].”

Bilawal said the impact of a decision by “three individuals” would be different from that of a larger bench, urging the apex court to consider the prevalent situation in the country.

The foreign minister said the criticism of the higher judiciary from within its own ranks was “historic” and an indication of their no-confidence in “these three judges”.

He questioned when it had happened before that a nine-member bench was whittled down to three after protest from its members.

Bilawal also questioned Justice Ahsan’s inclusion on the bench when he had originally distanced himself from February’s proceedings on the apex court’s suo motu notice of delay in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa elections.

Regarding CJP Bandial, the foreign minister said: “I think when your own court and your own judges express no confidence in your character and the bench, and distance themselves when such an important question is before you, then the constitutional thing to do is to form a larger bench in which all judges sit except those two who were caught on record taking advice from the opposition.”

Bilawal added that in such a situation the decision of all the judges would be acceptable to the coalition government.

He said his party would “fight and contest” if any court ordered it to utilise funds meant for flood affectees for the “battle of Lahore’s throne”.

FM Bilawal also criticised Supreme Court Registrar Ishrat Ali, saying it seemed as if he was a “super emperor who can strike off the judgement of a three-member bench through a notification whenever he wants”.

“I think when dictatorial methods are seen in the court and when judges themselves are saying ‘we have a one-man show’ then it will be better the chief justice and our judges get their own house in order and form a larger bench before anyone else takes any steps.”


Martial law declared halal by FM Bilawal Bhutto.
 
. .
And this is the reason why I wanted PTI to be more aggressive in defending Sindhi rights. The only reason PPP gets votes in Sindh is because the average Sindhi feels its the only party that defends Sindhi language and culture.

This is why PTI should have been campaigning more harder for less centre control and more provincial rights as outlined in the 18th Amendment.

More emphasis on regional languages. To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.

PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.
 
.
And this is the reason why I wanted PTI to be more aggressive in defending Sindhi rights. The only reason PPP gets votes in Sindh is because the average Sindhi feels its the only party that defends Sindhi language and culture.

This is why PTI should have been campaigning more harder for less centre control and more provincial rights as outlined in the 18th Amendment.

More emphasis on regional languages. To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.

PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.

Rural Sindhis won't easily vote for an "outsider". Unfortunately rural Sindhis have been kept in captivity for far too long.
 
.
His grandfather, mother all died for democracy in Pakistan

If he was a man of honor, he'd have stood up for democracy and rule of law
Him and honor in the same sentence? He’s c sucker. A POS. He’s an American puppet waiting to do their bidding like his who*e mom and rapist dad did.
F this guy.
 
.
Hey @El Sidd Your homeboy is having a moment. Won't you defend Bilawal?
 
.
More emphasis on regional languages.
Good but problematic statement down below
To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.
Veerey thuanu Sharam auni chai di, Lahore ich vas de oh teh fer vi wasaib di maa boli nu whakra boli man de oo, Panjab nu iik hor vaari vhandhne di gal kaarde oo, aes lai nai ke haye intazami tor chon Changi gal, mein taan ais gal chon sehmet aan, par tusi taan wasaib nu whakri saqafat man de oh, ai te saadi tareekh, te virse di baedbi AA, ais gal chon mein semat naa aan
PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.
 
Last edited:
.
Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Monday expressed concerns that the country could face a “martial law or an emergency-like situation” due to the constitutional crisis that might occur if the Supreme Court does not constitute a larger bench to hear the PTI’s petition against the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) decision to postpone polls to the Punjab Assembly.

For the past week, a three-member apex court bench — comprising Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Umar Ata Bandial, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Munib Akhtar — has been hearing the petition and rejected repeated requests from the coalition government for the formation of a full court bench on the matter. Earlier today, the court reserved its verdict in the case.

“My concern is that if a larger bench is not constituted then such a constitutional crisis will be born that God forbid martial law or emergency-type situation [could be] imposed again on Pakistan,” FM Bilawal said today while talking to media reporters in Larkana today, acknowledging that he was making a “big” statement.

Bilawal, whose media talk came after the top court reserved its verdict, said there was still time for everyone to “come back to their senses”.

He said that the institutions’ conduct should benefit the nation and “for that, it is necessary that our honourable judges form a full court to answer this important question [regarding the election date].”

Bilawal said the impact of a decision by “three individuals” would be different from that of a larger bench, urging the apex court to consider the prevalent situation in the country.

The foreign minister said the criticism of the higher judiciary from within its own ranks was “historic” and an indication of their no-confidence in “these three judges”.

He questioned when it had happened before that a nine-member bench was whittled down to three after protest from its members.

Bilawal also questioned Justice Ahsan’s inclusion on the bench when he had originally distanced himself from February’s proceedings on the apex court’s suo motu notice of delay in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa elections.

Regarding CJP Bandial, the foreign minister said: “I think when your own court and your own judges express no confidence in your character and the bench, and distance themselves when such an important question is before you, then the constitutional thing to do is to form a larger bench in which all judges sit except those two who were caught on record taking advice from the opposition.”

Bilawal added that in such a situation the decision of all the judges would be acceptable to the coalition government.

He said his party would “fight and contest” if any court ordered it to utilise funds meant for flood affectees for the “battle of Lahore’s throne”.

FM Bilawal also criticised Supreme Court Registrar Ishrat Ali, saying it seemed as if he was a “super emperor who can strike off the judgement of a three-member bench through a notification whenever he wants”.

“I think when dictatorial methods are seen in the court and when judges themselves are saying ‘we have a one-man show’ then it will be better the chief justice and our judges get their own house in order and form a larger bench before anyone else takes any steps.”


Martial law declared halal by FM Bilawal Bhutto.

This is a way of the ventriloquist giving the greenlight for martial law and to have a Sisi 2.0.

And this is the reason why I wanted PTI to be more aggressive in defending Sindhi rights. The only reason PPP gets votes in Sindh is because the average Sindhi feels its the only party that defends Sindhi language and culture.

This is why PTI should have been campaigning more harder for less centre control and more provincial rights as outlined in the 18th Amendment.

More emphasis on regional languages. To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.

PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.

PPP and JSQM are 2 sides of the same coin.

More emphasis on regional languages. To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.

Seraiki sooba has to do more with reducing Lahori Saamraaj and reducing Punjab's political power than cultural and regional stuff.

PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.

Pakistan Army won't ever let that happen. There's open rigging in Sindh elections.
 
Last edited:
. .
And this is the reason why I wanted PTI to be more aggressive in defending Sindhi rights. The only reason PPP gets votes in Sindh is because the average Sindhi feels its the only party that defends Sindhi language and culture.

This is why PTI should have been campaigning more harder for less centre control and more provincial rights as outlined in the 18th Amendment.

More emphasis on regional languages. To a certain extent they did with the proposed South Punjab province.

PTI won't sweep Sindh, but if they campaigned hard on the above, they could do damage.
He already lost the game, just wait Zardari evaporation.
 
.
His grandfather, mother all died for democracy in Pakistan

If he was a man of honor, he'd have stood up for democracy and rule of law
Yeah very democratic family. The same family which was stooges of British when they occupied. The same ZAB which had a paramilitary force just to suppress his opposition. The same Benazir who sidelined her own mother and got her brother killed for power.
Bilawal is living up to the legacy of his ancestors. They are generational slaves and corrupts.
The existence of their family is testament to Pakistan still being a hybrid colony of British.
In any other ghairatmand country the traitors who sided with the occupiers are killed or at very least exiled. In Pakistan these traitor scums ruled the so called “independent Pakistan”.
Come interior sindh and you’ll see how democratic their family was and is.
 
.
Yeah very democratic family. The same family which was stooges of British when they occupied. The same ZAB which had a paramilitary force just to suppress his opposition. The same Benazir who sidelined her own mother and got her brother killed for power.
Bilawal is living up to the legacy of his ancestors. They are generational slaves and corrupts.
The existence of their family is testament to Pakistan still being a hybrid colony of British.
In any other ghairatmand country the traitors who sided with the occupiers are killed or at very least exiled. In Pakistan these traitor scums ruled the so called “independent Pakistan”.
Come interior sindh and you’ll see how democratic their family was and is.
I am not supporting PPP in anyway but they all stood their ground when push came to shove BB survived a bomb attack and instead of going into hiding stood up, went back to her election campaign and died, ZAB stood up and instead of looking for a way out, faced hanging, BB's mother came back to Pakistan and campaigned for PPP, they were brutally beaten up by the police in Qaddafi stadium during the 80s but they stood up nonetheless

They're the biggest thugs to come out of Pakistan, they're evil they're everything we say they're - it's okay, I am not denying anything but all of em showed character and stood up for whatever reason

That show's character
 
. .
His grandfather, mother all died for democracy in Pakistan

If he was a man of honor, he'd have stood up for democracy and rule of law
that is a lie peddled to fool people. neither his mother nor his grandfather died for democracy. they died for greed and power.

ZAB stood up and instead of looking for a way out, faced hanging,
where did he stand up? no one thought he would be really hanged. esp after the pressure mounted by middle east and libya. he was under arrest, what standing up did he do?
 
. .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom