What's new

Proof of Ram Mandir at Ayodhya

. . .
I will break your hands if you try to touch any mosque.

You can only break the wind. You just wait and watch while we reclaim our places of worship one by one while Imran Khan keep on asking for peace.
 
.
https://web.archive.org/web/20050323101829/http://www.the-week.com/23sep07/events1.htm
I have read that study indicated it was Shiva temple and not Ram. The courts had given a fair judgement it should've been implemented. If mistakes were made in the past, they have to be accepted and rectified this is the true spirit of Islam.

The court tried to justify a hindu mobs destruction of a mosque, its upto indian muslims now to fight for their rights, assert their legal ownership of the site and understand the hindutva danger india has become
 
.
Enough of such videos, it's about time to be unapologetic about the whole issue. It's our Right and we must have it. The other side has mocked the sentiments of Hindus for far too long, now its time to return the favor with interest.

I want Babri to be rebuilt on the ruins of Katas Raj temple :coffee::
 
.
Babur's historic mosque was destroyed on the premise that a giant blue God was born on the site

And the "secular" indian court systems accepts hindutva mob violence based on this?
 
.
The court tried to justify a hindu mobs destruction of a mosque, its upto indian muslims now to fight for their rights, assert their legal ownership of the site and understand the hindutva danger india has become
The courts did not justify anything it proposed an amicable solution, please remember how our Muhammad (SAW) resolved the differences in the case of Hijr-e-Aswad.
 
. .
I want Babri to be rebuilt on the ruins of Katas Raj temple :coffee::
that would be shameful. The fact that the courts have taken action against the cement manufacturers that were pumping water and affecting the pond is the perfect indication that every Pakistani is equal in rights.
 
.
Ayodhya ram temple , is a Hindu religious scam of the 20th Century

The Untold Story of How the Rama Idol Surfaced Inside Babri Masjid

An excerpt from Krishna Jha and Dhirendra K. Jha's Ayodhya - The Dark Night that uncovers the story of how the mosque had turned into a temple overnight.


Three decades back, on the morning of 23 December 1949, the First Information Report (FIR) registered by Ayodhya Police following the planting of the idol of Lord Rama in Babri Masjid on the night before had named Abhiram Das as the prime accused.
He had also been tried for the crime he and his friends had committed that night, but the case had remained inconclusive. In course of time, many Hindus in Ayodhya had started calling him Ramajanmabhoomi Uddharak.

While the Mahatma was killed in full public view in broad daylight, the Babri Masjid was converted into a temple secretly, in the dead of night.

It seems impertinent to say that so little is known about the night of 22–23 December 1949 since, in a sense, almost the entire dispute over the mosque emanates from the appearance of the idol of Rama inside that structure. Nevertheless, it is true that there has been little research by contemporary or later writers to fill the gap. This missing link of history remained out of focus till the issue was politically revived and strengthened by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) in the mid-1980s. And by then the story of the night had been taken over by the politics of communalism and the debate over the proprietorship of the disputed land.

But till Lord Rama ‘manifested’ Himself inside the Babri Masjid, all moves had sought to construct the temple at Ramachabutara, an elevated platform outside the inner courtyard of the mosque. Only after the idols were placed inside did the demand for converting the Muslim place of worship into a temple enter the legal arena. And yet the development of that night did not attract much attention in the media when it actually took place. No major newspaper or journal of the time gave it the kind of serious coverage it deserved even though the import of the development was not at all lost on Congress leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Govind Ballabh Pant and Akshay Brahmachary as well as Hindu Mahasabha president N.B. Khare, its vice-president V.G. Deshpande and its all India general secretary and president of the party’s UP unit Mahant Digvijai Nath.

The only journal that covered the events in detail was a local Hindi weekly in Ayodhya called Virakta. Its editor, Ramgopal Pandey ‘Sharad’, was a known Mahasabhaite. The kind of material that Virakta published had a pronounced Hindu communal bias, and it was hardly expected to carry objective reportage on the developments. If anything, this journal was the first to promote the theory of ‘divine exercise’ – though in bits and pieces – to explain the appearance of the idol of Lord Rama inside the mosque.

Later, Ramgopal Pandey ‘Sharad’ wrote a booklet in Hindi – Shree Ramjanmabhoomi Ka Rakta Ranjit Itihaas (The Blood-soaked History of the Birth Place of Lord Rama). In Ayodhya, this has remained the most popular and perhaps only available material on the subject ever since. Like Virakta, this booklet, too, explains the developments of that night in terms of divine intervention rather than as a communal tactic conceived and executed by the Mahasabha in collaboration with local communalists. is is what the booklet says:

Twenty-third December 1949 was a glorious day for India. On that day, after a long gap of about four hundred years, the birth place of Lord Rama was redeemed. e way developments happened [on the night before], it can be said that Lord Rama himself redeemed his place of birth
.

https://thewire.in/books/untold-story-rama-idol-surfaced-inside-babri-masjid
 
. .
Babur's historic mosque was destroyed on the premise that a giant blue God was born on the site

And the "secular" indian court systems accepts hindutva mob violence based on this?
lets not go down that path, I have already pointed out that it was probably a Shiva and not a Ram Mandir and name calling is not going to end this issue. We are eastern people and our culture is based on the values we derive from our religions which are far more diverse that the west. Being secular is a tall order even for those western countries and they can be conveniently selective. In the end we can only try and minimize conflict.
 
.
propaganda . @KapitaanAli juta khaney ko tayyar ??
My heritage and cultural link to Babur is negligible, if any. I don't really care that his mosque got demolished.

The mosque that my heritage is linked to predates Mughals by nearly 1000 years and stands strong.

But those who demolished Babri and calls for a Mandir are privileged central Asian immigrant "Hindus" and those that they converted to their belief system. This is sad and another story.
 
Last edited:
.
lets not go down that path, I have already pointed out that it was probably a Shiva and not a Ram Mandir and name calling is not going to end this issue. We are eastern people and our culture is based on the values we derive from our religions which are far more diverse that the west. Being secular is a tall order even for those western countries and they can be conveniently selective. In the end we can only try and minimize conflict.

Grow some balls

You want muslims to relinquish a mosque that was attacked by a hindutva mob so a idolatrous pagan temple can be built?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom