What's new

PH Amphibious Capability - A History

Cossack25A1

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jul 11, 2014
Messages
2,566
Reaction score
2
Country
Philippines
Location
Philippines
Well, the history of the PH Navy is quite uh... like a roller-coaster.
----------
The Amphibious Warfare Capabilities of the Philippine Navy - Past, Present and Future

Saturday, February 28, 2015
MaxDefense


Being an archipelagic country with more than 7,100 islands comprising its land mass, the Philippines is a natural geography for use of the sea for transporting people, goods, and services. The government and the Philippine Navy knows of this strength and weakness, and utmost attention is given to improve on the capabilities in this regard. MaxDefense discusses the amphibious capabilities of the Philippine Navy on this entry, a short history of its beginnings, its current assets, and upcoming assets to beef up its dwindling fleet.

-----

Post War Surge:

Philippine Naval Patrol:

After World War II, the newly formed Philippine Naval Patrol (PNP, forefather of the Philippine Navy) acknowledges this by making priority to build-up its Amphibious and Sealift transport capabilities. Requests were made to the US government for the transfer of mothballed landing ships used during World War II, with several Landing Ships Tank (LST) and landing crafts transferred to the PNP in 1947. Some of the ships were even used to transport troops and supplies from the Philippines and Japan to South Korea in support of the Philippine Expeditionary Forces to Korea in the 1950s.


New Philippine Navy:

As the Philippine Offshore Patrol became the Philippine Navy, more former US Navy LSTs were transferred through the years. The Philippine Navy's amphibious capabilities peaked in the late 1970s, with the fleet having more than 20 LSTs, several Medium Landing Ships (LSM) and landing crafts of all sizes, and a few amphibious support vessels. All these assets were hand-me downs from the US government, or were former South Vietnamese Navy units handed-over by the US to the Philippines after escaping the fall of South Vietnam in the late 1970s.

Aside from amphibious support and transport duties, these vessels double up as patrol vessels, deployed in support of securing the Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) including areas of interest like the Kalayaan Group of Islands, and for Search and Rescue Operations. They were even used as offshore helicopter landing platforms for Philippine Air Force (PAF) and Navy helicopters, as naval gunfire provider during operations near waters, and for naval blockades against rebels and terrorists escaping from military ground operations. It once had the largest amphibious warfare fleet in Southeast Asia, all together capable of deploying several brigades worth of troops and warfighting assets.

-----

Decline in Amphibious Capabilities:

With the US bases in Clark and Subic permanently closed down in 1991, the continuous military support by the US government for the Philippine Armed Forces came to a halt. With this also affected the Philippine Navy's capabilities to have their ships repaired, spare parts acquired, and financial assistance to support ageing assets. One by one, most of the naval assets of the Philippine Navy, including most of its amphibious warfare fleet, were left for disrepair, and most were either cannibalized to maintain other ships or were sold as scrap.

The only new asset the Philippine Navy got in the 1990s were two Logistics Support Vessels (LSV), now called collectively as the Bacolod City-class LSV, from the US government as part of their military assistance bundled with the US bases rents. This was not enough to replace dozens of assets that were retired after long years of service. Additional assets acquired in the past few years include two locally-made Large Utility Landing Crafts (LCU), now called the BRP Tagbanua and BRP Manobo.

Currently, the Philippine Navy's amphibious capabilities are far less capable than it was decades ago. Of the dozens of ex-US Navy World War II era LST, LSM, Landing Crafts Utility (LCU), only a struggling few remain in active service while only a few new assets replaced all the retired ships of the past.

-----

Current Amphibious Warfare Capabilities of the Philippine Navy:

The PN of today have the following amphibious warfare vessels in its inventory:

Landing Ship Tank:

Only the BRP Laguna (LT-501) and the BRP Benguet (LT-507), both former US Navy World War II era tank landing ships remain in PN service. Both are becoming more difficult to maintain, as they require several dock repairs due to poor hull condition and ageing mechanical and electrical systems. Both are in working condition but require replacements very soon.


Logistics Support Vessels:

Probably the most capable transport assets of the Philippine Navy, the two Bacolod City-class LSVs, the BRP Bacolod City (LC-550) and the BRP Dagupan City (LC-551) were based on the US Army's Frank Beeson-class transport ships. The Philippine Navy version has a helicopter landing deck on the aft. Originally the LC-551 was to be named BRP Cagayan de Oro City, but with Fidel Ramos' victory as president-elect in 1992, politics came in and changes were made to change the name to a city from Pangasinan, thus becoming BRP Dagupan City.


Utility Landing Crafts:

The PN operates two large utility landing crafts (LCU), both locally made but of different design. The BRP Tagbanua (AT-296) was built by Philippine Iron Construction and Marine Corporation with Propmech as its integrator. The ship was a product of a PN project for a new class of LCU that is expected to form the backbone of the intra-theater sealift capability and a cheaper alternative to the LST and LSV. Unlike the Tagbanua, the other ship BRP Manobo (AT-297), came in to service quietly and was based on a different design. Both ships are relatively new, being both being commissioned during the term of President Aquino.

The PN also operates smaller utility landing crafts that were handed over by the US government decades ago. Of the many that once served the PN, only three ships remain: the BRP Subanon (AT-291), BRP Bagobo (AT-293), and BRP Tausug (AT-295). All are of the US Mark 6 design that were first put to action during World War II.


Other Assets:

Aside from LCUs, there are also several smaller landing crafts being used by the Philippine Navy, mostly the small Landing Craft, Vehicle, Personnel (LCVP) which are carried by larger amphibious assault ships. Although not really considered as amphibious warfare assets, the PN also operates six Multipurpose Attack Crafts (MPAC) in two sub-classes, which are high speed boats with capability to deploy infantry for insertion missions. More of this boats are being procured by the PN in the coming years, with a 3-unit tender expected to be completed by 2015.

-----

Looking at the Future: The Multirole Vessel Saga:

Fast forward to the mid 1990s when the AFP Modernization Act of 1995 was passed into law, part of which were the plans to acquire amphibious vessels to replace those old ones still in service with the PN. Although no specifics were made, the idea points to helicopter capable amphibious landing platforms, either a helipad-equipped landing ship tank, landing ship dock (LSD) or landing platform dock (LPD).


1990s - The Singaporean Endurance-class LST/LPD:

Plans for a helicopter capable platform was further reinforced with the Republic of Singapore Navy's introduction in the late 1990s of the Endurance-class landing ship tank, which is actually more of an LPD with an LST bow opening. The Philippine Navy sent officers to learn more about the ship as planning dictates towards something similar for its own acquisition plans.

Hopes were high on a possible contract for a unit or two with ST Engineering, until lack of funding shot down the plans. The quoted pricing made by the Singaporeans moved up as the Philippine government failed to quickly act on the funding, until the PN can't afford the ship anymore. This was the first of several attempts by the PN to get its hands to a modern amphibious warfare vessel.

The PN continuously looked for ways to acquire a similar vessel but has always looked at the Endurance-class as its basis, until a cheaper alternative came along.


Late 2000s - Arroyo Administration's Multirole Vessels, and Strategic Sealift Vessel Part 1:

During the term of President Gloria Arroyo, plans were made again to acquire at least 1 Multirole Vessel (MRV), which is actually an LPD bundled together with the essential Humanitarian and Disaster Relief (HADR) and combat capable equipment which includes a mobile hospital, lorries, landing crafts and amphibious assault vehicles. Several models were taken into consideration, including the Spanish Galicia-class, the Singaporean Endurance-class, and the Makassar-class built by the Koreans for the Indonesians.

An MRV package (1 ship plus all ancillaries) was worth Php 5 billion, as set by the Department of National Defense after their own study and evaluation. Eventually the Philippine Navy planned to get two, both from South Korea possibly using a derivative of Daesun's Makassar-class design, and will be paid by Multi-Year Obligation Agreement (MYOA) which is an financial assistance plan that allows the Philippine government to pay for the product by installment for a few years.

The plan was eventually cancelled as President Benigno Aquino III assumed office and a new policy on re-checking all deals entered by the Arroyo administration was made. The new administration believed that the MRV deal was overpriced and places the Philippine government at a disadvantage.

(More of the MRV project on the link: MaxDefense: The Everchanging Plans for Acquisition of Amphibious Transport Vessels for the PN)

Aside from the MRV, the Arroyo Administration also started a plan to acquire a so-called Strategic Sealift Vessel (SSV), the first time the term was used in a project. The plan calls for the acquisition of a Japanese second-hand civilian Roll-on, Roll-off (Ro-Ro) vessel for troop and vehicle transport around the archipelago and is an interim solution until an MRV will be available for the Philippine Navy. The proposal was made by the Center for Naval Leadership and Excellence, and a specific vessel was already eyed awaiting for approval and funding for the PN.

The project was also shelved due to the Philippine government's failure to immediately fund the project, and the eyed vessel was sold to another entity. No further attempt was made to look for another Ro-Ro vessel, and instead a new plan was made that calls for the integration of the MRV and SSV project into one, and this is what we now call the Strategic Sealift Vessel (SSV) project of the Aquino Administration.

(More of the SSV Ro-Ro on the link MaxDefense: The Everchanging Plans for Acquisition of Amphibious Transport Vessels for the PN)


Early 2010s - The Current Strategic Sealift Vessel:

The cancellation of the previous MRV and SSV projects paved way to a revised project, closely resembling the MRV project but without the package for ancillaries included which were decided to be acquired separately. This is now the Strategic Sealift Vessel that we know now.
Instead of a government to government route, the DND decided to hold a tender for the 2 ships with a budget of Php 4 billion. The technical specifications released were closely aligned to the Makassar-class LPD used by the Indonesian Navy. Several bidders gave interest although only ultimately only 2 entities submitted - Korea's Daesun which is the original builder of the Makassar-class, and Indonesia's PT PAL which built the Banjarmasin-class, itself a product of Daesun's technology transfer agreement with PT PAL. The Indonesian company later on won the bidding after Daesun's bid was disqualified for lack of supporting documents.

The Philippine Navy's specs for the SSV was previously discussed in an older MaxDefense blog, with the link provided MaxDefense: A clearer picture on the Strategic Sealift Vessel of the Philippine Navy

Compared to the previous MRV project, only the 2 landing crafts will remain as part of the contract, while the rest like the Amphibious Assault Vehicles were offered for bidding later on (which was won by South Korea's Samsung Techwin with the KAAV-7).

The first of class, which is still unnamed, held the first steel cutting ceremony last January 22, 2015, and the is expected to be delivered to the PN on or before May 2016. The second of the class is expected to start construction by mid-2015 and will be delivered by mid-2017. The Philippine Navy's Desired Force Mix whitepaper previously indicated the need for 4 SSVs, so it is probable that the PN will order 2 more similar ships in the future.

-----

Additional Used Amphibious-Capable Assets:
Aside from the two Strategic Sealift Vessels and their complementary landing crafts, the Philippine Navy were able to seal deals from friendly countries to transfer or sell their excess landing crafts.


Korean LCU:

The first that came out is from South Korea, with a donation for an unnamed landing craft utility MaxDefense believes it is a retired Mulgae-class LCU of the Republic of Korea Navy. There are still unconfirmed news that a second unit is being requested, although the news for the Korean transfers are still shady as of this writing.


Australian Balikpapan-class LCH:

The second batch of upcoming assets comes from Australia, with the donation of two retired Balikpapan-class Heavy Landing Crafts (LCH), the former HMAS Brunei and HMAS Tarakan. Both were donated by the Australian government and will be fully refurbished and delivered to the Philippine Navy by May 2015. In addition, the Australian government offered to sell three more retired Balikpapan-class LCH, the former HMAS Balikpapan, HMAS Wewak and HMAS Betano, with the offer accepted by the Philippine government at salvage prices.

With all these incoming assets, it's still not too late for the Philippine Navy. There are even plans to acquire more transport and amphibious assets from other countries, both new and used, due to their capability to transport goods during humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations. Being amphibious warfare assets, their primary mission is to bring in troops and assets by sea during combat operations, so these assets are very important for an archipelagic country like the Philippines.

-----
MaxDefense: The Amphibious Warfare Capabilities of the Philippine Navy - Past, Present and Future
-----
 
Last edited:
.
If the SSV project turn out well and PN satisfied with the result, i reccomend our "KRI Teluk Bintuni" LST class to boost PN Amphibious assets in the future. The price is cheaper than SSV.

120 meter length
18 meter wide
11 meter tall
speed 16 knot, engine 2×3285 KW
2.300 tonnes displacement.
can bring 4 unit LCVP
can bring heavy tank (10 leopard @ 62Ton)
can acomodate 2 unit helicopter with hangar facility
etc


tni3.jpg

tni4.jpg

tni2.jpg


.
 
.
It much exageregated article and comments, to said Philippine has the largest amphibious capability in ASEAN in the past is very laughable. South Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia always outnumbered Philippine amphibious capability since day one
 
.
It much exageregated article and comments, to said Philippine has the largest amphibious capability in ASEAN in the past is very laughable. South Vietnam, Thailand and Indonesia always outnumbered Philippine amphibious capability since day one

It possibly has something to do with the US Navy since it was clearly shown that when the US left the Philippines in the early 90s, our military deteriorated further and combined with corruption, it deteriorated at a very fast (and unsettling) pace.
 
.
It possibly has something to do with the US Navy since it was clearly shown that when the US left the Philippines in the early 90s, our military deteriorated further and combined with corruption, it deteriorated at a very fast (and unsettling) pace.

Nope, i just want to made it clear, even in the peak of Ph. Navy in medio 70's era, Ph. Navy amphibious capability is still below those of Thailand, South Vietnam and Indonesia let alone in the era far before then like the 60's (in which Indonesia Navy golden era) and 50's era. Your venture in Korean War and Vietnam war, is not much larger than the operation Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia has done in the past. If i am recall, even South Vietnamese Navy capable to taking some islets in your contested area near Philippine water.

For the deteriorated situation you guys facing today, it much because of internal situation not in the faults of American. Your leader and politician simply never put much attention towards Armed Forces and your armed forces top brass simply ignoring the plea of their subordinated who manning those rustic and antique ships.
 
.
Nope, i just want to made it clear, even in the peak of Ph. Navy in medio 70's era, Ph. Navy amphibious capability is still below those of Thailand, South Vietnam and Indonesia let alone in the era far before then like the 60's (in which Indonesia Navy golden era) and 50's era. Your venture in Korean War and Vietnam war, is not much larger than the operation Thailand, Vietnam and Indonesia has done in the past. If i am recall, even South Vietnamese Navy capable to taking some islets in your contested area near Philippine water.

For the deteriorated situation you guys facing today, it much because of internal situation not in the faults of American. Your leader and politician simply never put much attention towards Armed Forces and your armed forces top brass simply ignoring the plea of their subordinated who manning those rustic and antique ships.

Well I can't say anything much as this was from a blog.

Anyways, for the South Vietnam capable of taking an island, actually they took one did but we didn't do anything about it as we don't want to compromised our relations with South Vietnam when it still existed as a nation. When the North Vietnam re-unified their country by conquering the South, we didn't do anything with it at all as this could mean war with the USSR-backed Vietnam.

As for the Korean war, we only sent soldiers to help the war effort despite that our country is still in shambles due to WW2 and the Vietnam war, we were only a staging point for the American war machine due to their bases.

I am not exactly blaming the Americans on the low-state of our military but there is a correlation that when the US left the PH, our military deteriorated as most of our hardware from the 50s to the 80s were all "hands-me-down" and when they left, there are no more surplus weapons from them - we now have to buy them, which we can, if the money isn't plundered by the people on top.

And actually, our top brass did put attention towards the Armed Forces but in a very negative way - the top-brass likely asks for funds for the military. Unfortunately, the top brass see the funds for the military as their cash-cow or even their "financial tugboat", thus the money that could have been used for modernizing the military ends up in the bank accounts of the top-brass.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom