What's new

Pervez Hoodbhoy's Secular Delusion

I didn't. But thousands of other scientists around the globe have, and theee experiments are cited and referenced for further works in thousands of research institutes around the world. Which is why only, a select number, ever make it to science journals and are published.

The intensity and rigority of verification and validation are so high that it will take no less than a year for the COVID-19 vaccine to hit the markets, as despite its success in first phases. Which muslims will then claim that they already knew the medicine and it was revealed 1400 years ago.

That's the difference between science and religion.
So, will your scientists tell you whats morally right or wrong after performing some experiment in a multi billion dollar lab?
 
.
Ironically for him, peer-review method was introduced by Muslim religious scholars.

Great. I have read more books on the Golden period of Science and Islam than you have read regarding any and all topics combined.

Here's a glimpse from the past. One of the famous scholars in the Caliphate, I really wish I could remember his work, but I will look it up again, believed that the afterlife will be played out in our dream.
 
. .
He is not discussing a scientific formula or curriculum of science subject. Is he ?

Do you even know what is secularisim? Secularisim means a religion less life. So he is challenging your life style.

That's not what secularism means. Secularism simply means a state where religion has no business in state affairs. It's a personal matter of each individual.
 
.
Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to get rid of the whole Social events section in PDF...
 
.
They don't want their dumb sheep to question their authority.
These days they need degree holder slaves who don't realize that they have been enslaved.
Great. I have read more books on the Golden period of Science and Islam than you have read regarding any and all topics combined.

Here's a glimpse from the past. One of the famous scholars in the Caliphate, I really wish I could remember his work, but I will look it up again, believed that the afterlife will be played out in our dream.
i will help you. He was bu ali cena.
 
.
So in other words, other men in lab coats. Thanks for admitting that you yourself have never conducted these experiments and are a blind fanatical follower of the secular religion.

You also in a way follow the same thing. How do you know gravity exists or that the earth.is round, or different scientific laws that exist.
 
.
That's not what secularism means. Secularism simply means a state where religion has no business in state affairs. It's a personal matter of each individual.

How can it be personal when beliefs held by one affect others in the society?

Religion seems to be public and politics seem personal matter.
 
.
I didn't. But thousands of other scientists around the globe have, and theee experiments are cited and referenced for further works in thousands of research institutes around the world. Which is why only, a select number, ever make it to science journals and are published.

The intensity and rigority of verification and validation are so high that it will take no less than a year for the COVID-19 vaccine to hit the markets, as despite its success in first phases. Which muslims will then claim that they already knew the medicine and it was revealed 1400 years ago.

That's the difference between science and religion.
Pardon. which muslims will claim they knew 1000s of years ago? If you are talking about liars like moulana fazlu rehman, or khadim rivi and their likes then they will keep on lying from their teeth no matter what. Trump is a secular but doesn't he lie?

If we practice Islam or follow true islamic scholars like dr. israr ahmed, moulana tariq jamil and dr zakir naik you will never find these stupid claims.

You are merging criminals with islam who are using islam as a tool but didn't we saw water powered car. In such a scenario you call person as stupid and not science but when it comes to miss using religion, it always islam who is the culprit. Why?
 
.
These days they need degree holder slaves who don't realize that they have been enslaved.

i will help you. He was bu ali cena.

Poor guy would've had his head off in today's world. Same with Islamic philosophers like Ibn-e-Arabi.

That's how restricted and backward we have become.
 
. .
Pardon. which muslims will claim they knew 1000s of years ago? If you are talking about liars like moulana fazlu rehman, or khadim rivi and their likes then they will keep on lying from their teeth no matter what. Trump is a secular but doesn't he lie?

If we practice Islam or follow true islamic scholars like dr. israr ahmed, moulana tariq jamil and dr zakir naik you will never find these stupid claims.

You are merging criminals with islam who are using islam as a tool but didn't we saw water powered car. In such a scenario you call person as stupid and not science but when it comes to miss using religion, it always islam who is the culprit. Why?

Islam isn't, and never will be the culprit, but it will appear to seem so as long as people like those mentioned keep appearing, and the general public keeps on having stark opinions on science and hating other minority communities, and as long as terrorist organizations keep on claiming to follow Islam.

These are not a random result. Something is not right in the environment if that's what they're going into. And this will reflect, obviously, badly on Islam.
 
.
Poor guy would've had his head off in today's world. Same with Islamic philosophers like Ibn-e-Arabi.

That's how restricted and backward we have become.

Ibn e Arabi was a Muslim scholar not Islamic scholar.

Sarrak chaap secularist lag rahe hain aap
 
.
You also in a way follow the same thing. How do you know gravity exists or that the earth.is round, or different scientific laws that exist.
No I don't actually. I follow the Quran and Sunnah which are in fact compatible with and complete science.

Science itself is uncertain and ever changing, this is why you can't establish morality with science because science cannot justify morality.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom