What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

Lies, lies and more lies
IMG_20180412_162800.jpg
 
. .
Dear Many thanks for your explanatory reply now there are more than few questions which needed to be asked or proved .
For first part we have to separate his year of office vs year of wealth generation .In 2006 was he holding any office ? Now these are the same cases and this is the same NAB which has underwent leaps and bound after 1999 when Pervaiz Musharaf has loose all canons against them . Coming to the point the single most important evidence as on today was Qatari letter and its cross examination which is not done till today infact JIT refused to entertain or even accept the letter which was presented ,even though it was Notarized thru Qatar MOFA . Now again all this story above even it is correct why SC had to use a clause of Iqama ? over Panama ,As in the end SC and any court of law knows its not about accusing its about proving the same ,the same responsibility lies with Nab as well as as they accused any one they have to provide proof ,till today what ever evidence which can put him behind bar is either photocopy or has no Court values (im citing a reference in this case of Famous Zardari case) which was rolled back and he was given clean shit based on that ,In the end at the end of the day as on today it is just media trial in actual trial Wajid Zia is sweating like Pig ,all his work done is nothing but waste paper found from Urdu Bazar ,It's not about accusing its about proving and specially in case of sitting PM things look odd specially when you are unable to prove any thing
First of all tell me do you really care about Pakistan and justice or are you here just to defend NS ? If you really care about NS then your question should have been different, You are asking legal questions (which I have already answer and can further answer) but not focusing on the the real issue ...

I have already explained that NS is guilty as per law ...

Regarding, Iqama issue. Based on evidence judges already knew that he is guilty, but NS started hiding behind technicality that Supreme court cannot hear the case as it is a trial court ... So why are you not against NS plea when he did not provide evidence in Supreme COurt on technical grounds but in the same case SC is disqualifying NS on technical ground tu tm noonies ko problem ha,,,

Why are you not asking k NS ny Supreme court ko yeh q kaha k you are not trial court and you cannot hear cases? Why did not he put forward the evidence straight away ( only if evidence is there which we know is not) ...
 
.
2 saal beet gaye ye tamasha dekhte huay...............
ya bhut he azeem case hai is keh faislay say mulk ki taqdeer badlay gee!!! app bas 50-100 saal aur wait karlo.

kissi half decent mulk may shareefs aur zardari jail may sexual abuse keh victim ban chukay hootay hain lakin hamaray mulk may ayashi hai! looot hai bc
 
.
ya bhut he azeem case hai is keh faislay say mulk ki taqdeer badlay gee!!! app bas 50-100 saal aur wait karlo.

kissi half decent mulk may shareefs aur zardari jail may sexual abuse keh victim ban chukay hootay hain lakin hamaray mulk may ayashi hai! looot hai bc

magistrate level ka case dhakkan qaum ne SC tak le gai.....

buttparast qaumen isi tarah barbaad hojati hai..phir unki jagah nayi abaad hojati hai....

log itna pareshan hain kay maan ki ankh syria ho ya afghanistan..inko nahi chorna
 
.
magistrate level ka case dhakkan qaum ne SC tak le gai.....

buttparast qaumen isi tarah barbaad hojati hai..phir unki jagah nayi abaad hojati hai....

log itna pareshan hain kay maan ki ankh syria ho ya afghanistan..inko nahi chorna
sir is qanoon paicheet gi say toh may itna waqif nai but huur saboot huur gawah miyan keh khilaf hai its an open and shut case 2 din may verdict aur phansi type but itna drag kyon ho raha hai ya samjhe say bahir hai!!!

butt parast? chacha app keh fetish khatam nai hootay yahan bc qoum ki mother sister hogaye hai and all you care about are butts!!!lols

no but you are right hum shayed hindu say barray butt parast hain hamai bc huur fauji hguur siyasat daan huur judge messiah lagta hai and we follow him blindly annd worship him like sheeps!!!
 
.
sir is qanoon paicheet gi say toh may itna waqif nai but huur saboot huur gawah miyan keh khilaf hai its an open and shut case 2 din may verdict aur phansi type but itna drag kyon ho raha hai ya samjhe say bahir hai!!!

butt parast? chacha app keh fetish khatam nai hootay yahan bc qoum ki mother sister hogaye hai and all you care about are butts!!!lols

no but you are right hum shayed hindu say barray butt parast hain hamai bc huur fauji hguur siyasat daan huur judge messiah lagta hai and we follow him blindly annd worship him like sheeps!!!

its always about the Butts
 
. . .
First of all tell me do you really care about Pakistan and justice or are you here just to defend NS ? If you really care about NS then your question should have been different, You are asking legal questions (which I have already answer and can further answer) but not focusing on the the real issue ...

I have already explained that NS is guilty as per law ...

Regarding, Iqama issue. Based on evidence judges already knew that he is guilty, but NS started hiding behind technicality that Supreme court cannot hear the case as it is a trial court ... So why are you not against NS plea when he did not provide evidence in Supreme COurt on technical grounds but in the same case SC is disqualifying NS on technical ground tu tm noonies ko problem ha,,,

Why are you not asking k NS ny Supreme court ko yeh q kaha k you are not trial court and you cannot hear cases? Why did not he put forward the evidence straight away ( only if evidence is there which we know is not) ...
As we said before, you're wasting your time with that troll.
 
. .
So on today's Muqabil they revealed the new draft bill which changes NAB laws. NAB will only work in Islamabad while provinces make their own NAB.
MPAs,MNAs and all ministers will be exempt from NAB laws.
Burden of proof will no longer be on the accused, but on NAB prosecution.
NAB head cannot issue arrest warrants but will instead be issued by accountability court judge.
 
.
So on today's Muqabil they revealed the new draft bill which changes NAB laws. NAB will only work in Islamabad while provinces make their own NAB.
MPAs,MNAs and all ministers will be exempt from NAB laws.
Burden of proof will no longer be on the accused, but on NAB prosecution.
NAB head cannot issue arrest warrants but will instead be issued by accountability court judge.

If true then it's game on. Looks like they are gonna be moving their chess pieces simultaneously. No way that SCP will let this mockery stand but gonna be targeted at the same time too.

Right from the time of Dawn leaks, they must have been looking for a Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Ziauddin butt...(another Brahman butt @El Sidd)

...Now more than ever they must be feeling the need of the above if such allegations about NAB law changes are true.
 
.
If true then it's game on. Looks like they are gonna be moving their chess pieces simultaneously. No way that SCP will let this mockery stand but gonna be targeted at the same time too.

Right from the time of Dawn leaks, they must have been looking for a Saeeduzzaman Siddiqui and Ziauddin butt...(another Brahman butt @El Sidd)

...Now more than ever they must be feeling the need of the above if such allegations are true.

From chaos comes order
 
.
From chaos comes order
And the sound of boots but I'm sure this time, in sha Allah, the sound would be of boots hitting the tooi (as coined by @Path-Finder) and not the sound of boots stomping the constitution. That's the cause of their biggest pain in the Brahman butt too. No victimization excuse to show the world.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom