S-2
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2007
- Messages
- 4,210
- Reaction score
- 0
Courtesy of Jane Perlez at the NYT, this report on the Pakistani legislature nicely reflects the sentiment seen at this board by a vocal minority.
Pakistani Legislators Show Little Appetite For the Fight-NYT
I don't know, but suspect, that this board generally reflects the conservative and modestly to radical pro-military bent of the nation. Can it lead and will the rest follow?
It might be fairly suggested that any action by the legislature in support of ongoing military operations in SWAT, Bajaur, and N. Waziristan might be luke-warm and well diluted if these missions entail any length.
In fact, these missions will be lengthy. Anybody suggesting otherwise doesn't understand the nature of the fight. Even after active combat operations there shall be a requirement for significant security forces to implement and enforce the writ of state while providing protection to the equally significant civil assistance which, hopefully, will rapidly follow on end.
I say "hopefully" but without close and careful coordination and planning by various non-military government institutions to reconcile and de-conflict inevitably competing needs, there will be a collapse of the over-arching objective of bringing the state's abilities to serve to it's citizens and autonomous "wards of state".
Let's hope that the Pakistani legislature rapidly learns that it can't wish away the hard responsibilities of governance for which they've been entrusted by it's people and, further, learn themselves how to lead their own constituents by more than empty words.
Pakistani Legislators Show Little Appetite For the Fight-NYT
I don't know, but suspect, that this board generally reflects the conservative and modestly to radical pro-military bent of the nation. Can it lead and will the rest follow?
It might be fairly suggested that any action by the legislature in support of ongoing military operations in SWAT, Bajaur, and N. Waziristan might be luke-warm and well diluted if these missions entail any length.
In fact, these missions will be lengthy. Anybody suggesting otherwise doesn't understand the nature of the fight. Even after active combat operations there shall be a requirement for significant security forces to implement and enforce the writ of state while providing protection to the equally significant civil assistance which, hopefully, will rapidly follow on end.
I say "hopefully" but without close and careful coordination and planning by various non-military government institutions to reconcile and de-conflict inevitably competing needs, there will be a collapse of the over-arching objective of bringing the state's abilities to serve to it's citizens and autonomous "wards of state".
Let's hope that the Pakistani legislature rapidly learns that it can't wish away the hard responsibilities of governance for which they've been entrusted by it's people and, further, learn themselves how to lead their own constituents by more than empty words.