What's new

Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal could become world’s third-biggest: report

Zarvan

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
54,470
Reaction score
87
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan_Missile_Test_04f6a.jpg

This image released by the Pakistani government shows the test launching of a Ghaznavi missile at an undisclosed location in Pakistan on May 10, 2012. Pakistan successfully test-fired a short-range missile capable of delivering a nuclear warhead, Pakistan's military said. (Interservices Public Relations department/AP Photos) (AP)

By Tim Craig August 27 at 12:01 AM
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan – A new report by two American think tanks claims Pakistan may be building 20 nuclear warheads annually and could have the world’s third-largest nuclear stockpile within a decade.

The report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Stimson Center concludes Pakistan is rapidly expanding its nuclear capabilities due to fear of its arch-rival, India, also a nuclear power. The report, which will be publicly released Thursday, says Pakistan is now far outpacing India in the development of nuclear warheads.

Currently, analysts believe that Pakistan has about 120 nuclear warheads while India has about 100.

In the coming years, the report states, Pakistan’s advantage could grow dramatically because it has a large stockpile of highly enriched uranium which could be used to quickly produce low-yield nuclear devices.

India has far larger stockpiles of plutonium -- which is needed to produce high-yield warheads – than Pakistan does. But the report says India appears to be using most of its plutonium to produce domestic energy.


Pakistan could have at least 350 nuclear weapons within five to 10 years, the report concludes. Pakistan would then likely possess more nuclear weapons than another country besides the United States and Russia, which each havethousands of the bombs.

“The growth path of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, enabled by existing infrastructure, goes well beyond the assurances of credible minimal deterrence provided by Pakistani officials and analysts after testing nuclear devices,” the report states.

Pakistani military officials were not available to comment on the report when it was made available to journalists on Wednesday night.

Western officials and analysts have struggled for years to get an accurate assessment of Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities. Several Pakistani analysts questioned the findings of the new report, saying it’s based on a faulty assumption that Pakistan is using all of its existing stockpiles of fissile material to make nuclear weapons.

SPONSOR-GENERATED CONTENTLower gas prices can endure long term
By Goldman SachsThe U.S. oil surge has spurred a reorganization of global energy production.READ MORE

Mansoor Ahmed, a nuclear expert at Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad, said he suspects that a more accurate assessment of Pakistan’s capability is that it can develop no more than 40 to 50 new warheads over the next several years. Ahmed, however, doesn’t dispute that Pakistan’s military is seeking toexpand its nuclear capabilities.

“This report is overblown,” said Ahmed, who was recently named a nuclear security fellow at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. “However … what the world must understand is that nuclear weapons are part of Pakistan’s belief system. It’s a culture that has been built up over the years because (nuclear weapons) have provided a credible deterrence against external aggression.”

France has about 300 warheads while the United Kingdom has about 215, according to the Federation of American Scientists. China has around 250.


The new report was written by Toby Dalton, co-director of the Carnegie Endowment’s Nuclear Policy Program, and Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Stimson Center.

Pakistan is believed to use plutonium as well as highly enriched uranium to create nuclear warheads. Dalton noted Pakistan recently added a fourth plutonium production reactor at its Khushab Nuclear Complex.

“We assume, maybe correctly, maybe inaccurately, with the fuel coming out of the four reactors, they are processing it as rapidly as possible to get the plutonium out,” Dalton said.

India and Pakistan, which have fought three major wars, became declared nuclear powers in 1998. Since then, Western leaders have been increasingly alarmed about the potential for a nuclear exchange between the rivals.

India has adopted a no-first-use policy on nuclear weapons. Pakistani leaders have repeatedly declined to take a similar stance, saying they might be forced to resort to using the weapons should India’s larger army ever invade Pakistan.

India views “nuclear weapons as a political tool, a prestige item, not something you use on a battlefield,” Krepon said. In Pakistan, he said, nuclear weapons are seen as “things you have to be willing to use” to guarantee stability.

But Krepon and Dalton say there is still time for Pakistan to slow down the development of its nuclear arsenal. If it does, they say, the international community should consider what steps it can take to recognize it as a responsible nuclear state.

Report: Pakistan's nuclear arsenal could become the world’s third-biggest - The Washington Post
@Horus @Gufi @Irfan Baloch @waz @Arsalan @nair @GURU DUTT @Areesh @A.Rafay @Slav Defence @syedali73 @TankMan @AUz @SarthakGanguly @Hakan
 
This is all that Really Matters :

India has far larger stockpiles of plutonium -- which is needed to produce high-yield warheads – than Pakistan does. But the report says India appears to be using most of its plutonium to produce domestic energy.


Now that is something to be proud of, after all Nukes 100x or 1000x wont matter ( even 1 Nuke will do unimaginable damage ) , the Bulbs in a common man's house will.

Like India, Pakistan too needs Electricity far far far...more than Nukes( which they already have ).

India knows ( Like France, Israel and China , It doesnt need any more nukes ) this, when will Pakistan Realize the Same ?


On a Serious Note, In 2015, what really matters is the DELIVERY of the weapon rather the NUMBER of weapons. This is why Israel, China and India are now focusing on R&D in Deliveray systems like Subs and MIRVs.

India with Nuclear SSBNs , Air Launched Supersonic Missiles and Next Generation Agni IV, MIRV Capable Agni V, is much better position to conduct an ACCURATE , PIN POINTED , RETALIATION ( NFU ).


The Only Logic that does go in favor of having more Nukes for Pakistan is the Deployment of Indian BMD system.
 
Last edited:
On a comparative study this does not bode well.
All countries have a lower n-bomb: netGDP ratio. (barring North Korea, I don't know what that piece of siht is)
 
This is all that Really Matters :

India has far larger stockpiles of plutonium -- which is needed to produce high-yield warheads – than Pakistan does. But the report says India appears to be using most of its plutonium to produce domestic energy.


Now that is something to be proud of, after all Nukes 100x or 1000x wont matter ( even 1 Nuke will do unimaginable damage ) , the Bulbs in a common man's house will.

Like India, Pakistan too needs Electricity far far far...more than Nukes( which they already have ).

India knows ( Like France, Israel and China , It doesnt need any more nukes ) this, when will Pakistan Realize the Same ?


On a Serious Note, In 2015, what really matters is the DELIVERY of the weapon rather the NUMBER of weapons. This is why Israel, China and India are now focusing on R&D in Deliveray systems like Subs and MIRVs.

India with Nuclear SSBNs , Air Launched Supersonic Missiles and Next Generation Agni IV, MIRV Capable Agni V, is much better position to conduct an ACCURATE , PIN POINTED , RETALIATION ( NFU ).


The Only Logic that does go in favor of having more Nukes for Pakistan is the Deployment of Indian BMD system.

We have watched your nukes quality in your tests .... dabba bomb

and By 2035 Pakistan will build 30,000 megawatts capacity of nuclear power.
 
We have watched your nukes quality in your tests .... dabba bomb

and By 2035 Pakistan will build 30,000 megawatts capacity of nuclear power.

Shahid Mia, Did u realize you just proved that you are an Idiot with Zero knowledge of Nuclear Science ?
After all, Nuclear Tests conducted by India ( and Pakistan ) were UNDERGROUND and were NOT SEEN rather detected via seismographs and chemical analysis.

Also, And Plz tell me, Why did Pakistan make the Huge Efforts, Ate Grass, to Counter a "Dabba Bomb" ? After All, You dont need a bullet to counter a stick. isnt it ?

InshaAllah...I wish Pakistan goes far beyond 35GW , They even have plans to buy electricity from India. This is True form of Development that needs focus in entire SA. Electricity means more access to net , education and better understanding, which is the need of the hour in Pakistan.
 
945689-Untitled-1440653424-288-640x480.gif

Pakistan could have at least 350 nuclear weapons within the next five to 10 years, making it the world’s third-largest nuclear stockpile, according to a new report produced by two American think tanks.

The report by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Stimson Center states Pakistan is rapidly expanding its nuclear capabilities owing to a fear of India.

However, Pakistan is far outpacing India in the development of nuclear warheads, the report adds. According to estimates, Pakistan has 120 nuclear heads while India has around 100.

Further, the report said Pakistan could be building up to 20 nuclear warheads annually.

“The growth path of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal, enabled by existing infrastructure, goes well beyond the assurances of credible minimal deterrence provided by Pakistani officials and analysts after testing nuclear devices.”

Read: Pakistan has fastest growing nuclear weapons programme in the world: report

The report stated in the next few years, Pakistan’s large stockpile of highly enriched uranium that could be used to quickly produce low-yield nuclear devices would become a growing advantage for the country.

India on the other hand, has far larger stockpiles of plutonium, which is needed to produce high-yield warheads, than Pakistan does. However, India appears to be using most of its plutonium to produce domestic energy.

With increasing warheads, Pakistan would probably possess more nuclear weapons than any country except the United States and Russia which each have thousands of the bombs.

Nuclear expert at the Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad, Mansoor Ahmed, said he suspects that “a more accurate assessment of Pakistan’s capability is that it can develop no more than 40 to 50 new warheads over the next several years.”

However, Ahmed did not dispute that Pakistan’s military is seeking to expand its nuclear capabilities.

Read: US confident of Pakistan’s ability to safeguard nuclear weapons

According to sources, Pakistani military officials were not available to comment on the report when it was made available to journalists ahead of its release.

“This report is overblown,” Ahmed said. However, Ahmed, who was recently named a nuclear security fellow at Harvard University’s John F Kennedy School of Government added “what the world must understand is that nuclear weapons are part of Pakistan’s belief system. It’s a culture that has been built up over the years because [nuclear weapons] have provided a credible deterrence against external aggression.”

For many years, western officials have struggled to get an accurate assessment of Pakistan’s nuclear capabilities.

Findings of the report were questioned by many Pakistani analysts, saying it is based on a faulty assumption that Pakistan is using all of its existing stockpiles of fissile material to make nuclear weapons.

Further, the report, written by Toby Dalton, co-director of the Carnegie Endowment’s Nuclear Policy Program, and Michael Krepon, co-founder of the Stimson Centre noted that Pakistan is believed to use plutonium as well as highly enriched uranium to create nuclear warheads.

According to Dalton, Pakistan recently added a fourth plutonium production reactor at its Khushab Nuclear Complex.

“We assume, maybe correctly, maybe inaccurately, with the fuel coming out of the four reactors, they are processing it as rapidly as possible to get the plutonium out,” Dalton said.

Read: July-May: Rs48b spent on Karachi’s nuclear power plants

India and Pakistan, which have fought three major wars, were declared nuclear powers in 1998. Since then, Western leaders have been increasingly alarmed about the potential for a nuclear exchange between the rivals.

India views nuclear weapons “as a political tool, a prestige item, not something you use on a battlefield,” Krepon said. In Pakistan, he said, nuclear weapons are seen as “things you have to be willing to use” to guarantee stability.

Concluding, both Krepon and Dalton said there is still time for Pakistan to slow down the development of its nuclear arsenal. If it does, they said, “the international community should consider what steps it can take to recognise it as a responsible nuclear state.”

Among other nuclear-power nations, France has about 300 warheads and the United Kingdom has about 215. Meanwhile, China has approximately 250.
 
LOL. What you will do with 350 N-Bombs?? It is none of my business what you should do with your storage plutonium but it is common sense that if you fire just one N-bomb , you will not be available to fire another. Then what is the use of another 349???:crazy:
 
I believe Pakistan already have 200 + warheads but next five years the old warheads meant to deploy by fighter will retire (around 40-50) will be replaced by new lighter plutonium based warheads spiked with tritium to increase the yield. In that case Pakistan maintain 200 Active warheads.
 
Shahid Mia, Did u realize you just proved that you are an Idiot with Zero knowledge of Nuclear Science ?
After all, Nuclear Tests conducted by India ( and Pakistan ) were UNDERGROUND and were NOT SEEN rather detected via seismographs and chemical analysis.

Also, And Plz tell me, Why did Pakistan make the Huge Efforts, Ate Grass, to Counter a "Dabba Bomb" ? After All, You dont need a bullet to counter a stick. isnt it ?

InshaAllah...I wish Pakistan goes far beyond 35GW , They even have plans to buy electricity from India. This is True form of Development that needs focus in entire SA. Electricity means more access to net , education and better understanding, which is the need of the hour in Pakistan.

both countries are yet to declassify the full extent and results of their nuclear tests, the tests ( in my opinion) being more symbolic than scientific.

However .... hmare passsss zyaadaaaa bomb hain :P aur tmhara b koi superior bomb ni hai agar dabba ni hai tou
 
LOL. What you will do with 350 N-Bombs?? It is none of my business what you should do with your storage plutonium but it is common sense that if you fire just one N-bomb , you will not be available to fire another. Then what is the use of another 349???:crazy:
who told u that we will only fire one
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom