What's new

Pakistan’s external debt likely to swell to $110b in four years

Nilgiri

BANNED
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
24,797
Reaction score
81
Country
India
Location
Canada
Not sure if it got posted anywhere else.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1229155...s-external-debt-likely-swell-110b-four-years/

Pakistan’s external debt likely to swell to $110b in four years

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s external debt is projected to grow to a whopping $110 billion within four years and it will need over $22 billion a year just to meet external payment requirements, posing a serious threat to the country’s solvency.

By that time, Pakistan will again be back to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to avoid default on international payments as it did in 2013, according to independent projections revealed at the National Debt Conference on Saturday.

Two renowned economists, former finance minister Dr Hafiz Pasha and former director general debt Dr Ashfaque Hasan Khan, have made the external debt projections. The $110-billion external debt level by 2019-20 will be $24 billion higher than projections made by the IMF in its latest report on Pakistan.

Khan shared his assessment at the debt conference, arranged by the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME) – an independent think tank.

The duo updated their previous external debt forecast for fiscal year 2018-19 from $90 billion to $98 billion after the government borrowed heavily in the past one year.

At present, the external debt stands at $73 billion, which has been projected to swell 50% to $110 billion in just four years.

They did not see a major change in Pakistan’s export situation and anticipated that by 2019-20, the exports would stand roughly at $25 billion, a level that the country crossed in the last year of previous government of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).

18-1478976900.jpg


Owing to slowdown in exports, Pakistan’s external debt to export ratio has been projected at 441.8% by 2019-20, which is highly unsustainable. By that year, the country will consume 40% of its export earnings to service the external debt.

“Pakistan is fast slipping into the debt trap and neither the government nor parliament is playing its due role,” remarked Asad Umar, MNA of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf while speaking at the conference.

Khan said by 2019-20 amortisation payments would increase to $10 billion. To fill the current account gap, the country will require another $12.5 billion a year, increasing the total external payment requirement to $22.5 billion. The current account deficit will mainly widen due to imports of machinery and plants for projects being developed under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Against IMF’s projection of $16.7 billion, Khan said total external financing needs to bridge the current account deficit and repay loans would stand at $22.5 billion by 2019-20.

After exhausting all available resources including CPEC financing, foreign investment and funds from traditional donors, there would still be $11-billion financing gap, which the country would not be able to bridge without IMF’s help, said Khan.

He predicted that Pakistan would return to the IMF in 2018-19 – the fiscal year when the country’s external debt would be $98 billion and its financing gap will be $9 billion.

“Pakistan’s debt situation is deteriorating rapidly and posing a serious threat to its solvency,” he cautioned. Commercial borrowings comprised 25% of external debt, which was a matter of concern, said Shahid Kardar, former governor of the State Bank of Pakistan.

He said low returns on the country’s foreign currency reserves compared to the borrowing cost were also a matter of concern.

Khan said the PML-N and PPP governments had added $49 billion to the current external debt of $73 billion. Most of this amount, estimated at $32.6 billion, was added from 2008 to 2016 while the remaining $17.4 billion was added during the 1990s.

“We need to develop a more effective borrowing strategy, which should be consistent with the country’s development priorities,” suggested Khan.

“Pakistan can keep its debt at sustainable levels by achieving about 6% annual economic growth,” said Dr Ali Kemal, research economist at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). He, however, said despite the increase in debt levels, Pakistan was still not Greece.

“We are at a comfortable stage and there is no need to worry about anything,” said Zafar Masud, Director General of the Central Directorate of National Savings, while speaking at the conference.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 13th, 2016.

@farhan_9909 @LA se Karachi @Khan_21 @Areesh @WAJsal @Devil Soul @madokafc @Bilal9 et al.
 
.
Higher debts are not necessarily bad if your economy is prospering. Look at Turkey to understand my point.

2002 Erdogan's AKP came to power:

turkey-external-debt.png


vs.


turkey-government-debt-to-gdp.png


All depends on how you invest the borrowed money. As long as you generate a sustainable profit (economic growth) with the lend money the total figures are irrelevant.
 
.
Higher debts are not necessarily bad if your economy is prospering. Look at Turkey to understand my point.

2002 Erdogan's AKP came to power:

turkey-external-debt.png


vs.


turkey-government-debt-to-gdp.png


All depends on how you invest the borrowed money. As long as you generate a sustainable profit (economic growth) with the lend money the total figures are irrelevant.

Why has the debt gone up ??

Not sure if it got posted anywhere else.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1229155...s-external-debt-likely-swell-110b-four-years/

Pakistan’s external debt likely to swell to $110b in four years

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s external debt is projected to grow to a whopping $110 billion within four years and it will need over $22 billion a year just to meet external payment requirements, posing a serious threat to the country’s solvency.

By that time, Pakistan will again be back to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to avoid default on international payments as it did in 2013, according to independent projections revealed at the National Debt Conference on Saturday.

Two renowned economists, former finance minister Dr Hafiz Pasha and former director general debt Dr Ashfaque Hasan Khan, have made the external debt projections. The $110-billion external debt level by 2019-20 will be $24 billion higher than projections made by the IMF in its latest report on Pakistan.

Khan shared his assessment at the debt conference, arranged by the Policy Research Institute of Market Economy (PRIME) – an independent think tank.

The duo updated their previous external debt forecast for fiscal year 2018-19 from $90 billion to $98 billion after the government borrowed heavily in the past one year.

At present, the external debt stands at $73 billion, which has been projected to swell 50% to $110 billion in just four years.

They did not see a major change in Pakistan’s export situation and anticipated that by 2019-20, the exports would stand roughly at $25 billion, a level that the country crossed in the last year of previous government of Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP).

18-1478976900.jpg


Owing to slowdown in exports, Pakistan’s external debt to export ratio has been projected at 441.8% by 2019-20, which is highly unsustainable. By that year, the country will consume 40% of its export earnings to service the external debt.

“Pakistan is fast slipping into the debt trap and neither the government nor parliament is playing its due role,” remarked Asad Umar, MNA of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf while speaking at the conference.

Khan said by 2019-20 amortisation payments would increase to $10 billion. To fill the current account gap, the country will require another $12.5 billion a year, increasing the total external payment requirement to $22.5 billion. The current account deficit will mainly widen due to imports of machinery and plants for projects being developed under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Against IMF’s projection of $16.7 billion, Khan said total external financing needs to bridge the current account deficit and repay loans would stand at $22.5 billion by 2019-20.

After exhausting all available resources including CPEC financing, foreign investment and funds from traditional donors, there would still be $11-billion financing gap, which the country would not be able to bridge without IMF’s help, said Khan.

He predicted that Pakistan would return to the IMF in 2018-19 – the fiscal year when the country’s external debt would be $98 billion and its financing gap will be $9 billion.

“Pakistan’s debt situation is deteriorating rapidly and posing a serious threat to its solvency,” he cautioned. Commercial borrowings comprised 25% of external debt, which was a matter of concern, said Shahid Kardar, former governor of the State Bank of Pakistan.

He said low returns on the country’s foreign currency reserves compared to the borrowing cost were also a matter of concern.

Khan said the PML-N and PPP governments had added $49 billion to the current external debt of $73 billion. Most of this amount, estimated at $32.6 billion, was added from 2008 to 2016 while the remaining $17.4 billion was added during the 1990s.

“We need to develop a more effective borrowing strategy, which should be consistent with the country’s development priorities,” suggested Khan.

“Pakistan can keep its debt at sustainable levels by achieving about 6% annual economic growth,” said Dr Ali Kemal, research economist at the Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE). He, however, said despite the increase in debt levels, Pakistan was still not Greece.

“We are at a comfortable stage and there is no need to worry about anything,” said Zafar Masud, Director General of the Central Directorate of National Savings, while speaking at the conference.

Published in The Express Tribune, November 13th, 2016.

@farhan_9909 @LA se Karachi @Khan_21 @Areesh @WAJsal @Devil Soul @madokafc @Bilal9 et al.

Is CPEC increasing the debt ??
 
.
A few problems for Pakistan which will have a direct impact on the ever increasing debt

1. Decrease in exports
2. Decrease in incoming remittances
3. Stagnant tax collection
4. Huge black economy.
5. Corruption and wastage of National Treasury

Need quick and drastic measures are required to reverse the tide or else the future looks bleak for Pakistan.
 
.
Is CPEC increasing the debt ??

Yes. CPEC is mostly debt based. Its effectively all loans from China that many here hope will have high ROI that Pakistan can then capitalize on long term.

That remains to be seen however. In the short to mid term, there is going to be a lot of pure debt created.
 
.
A few problems for Pakistan which will have a direct impact on the ever increasing debt

1. Decrease in exports
2. Decrease in incoming remittances
3. Stagnant tax collection
4. Huge black economy.
5. Corruption and wastage of National Treasury

Need quick and drastic measures to reverse the tide or else the future looks bleak for Pakistan.
on the plus side energy prices have fallen
 
. .
what? where? they are actually gone up and the gas prices are set to increase as well

oil prices have fallen from $100 to below $50
Are the refiners in Pakistan passing the cost savings to the common man ? that is another story.
 
.
Why has the debt gone up ??

This is a typical pattern for countries like China, India, Mexico, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Africa, Brazil, Turkey...etc. Developing economies borrow money to invest mainly in infrastructure and education in order to close the gap between themselves and the industrial economies. This is totally normal and very well - as long as you use the money wisely.

china-external-debt.png

india-external-debt.png

indonesia-external-debt.png

south-africa-external-debt.png
 
.
I am sure pakistan can handle it. Cpec is certainly going to boost their economy, so no need to worry there. Cpec has got them covered.
 
.
This is a typical pattern for countries like China, India, Mexico, Indonesia, Malaysia, South Africa, Brazil, Turkey...etc. Developing economies borrow money to invest mainly in infrastructure and education in order to close the gap between themselves and the industrial economies. This is totally normal and very well - as long as you use the money wisely.

china-external-debt.png

india-external-debt.png

indonesia-external-debt.png

south-africa-external-debt.png
I understand the general principles. Has Turkey done something in specific ??
 
.
All depends on how you invest the borrowed money. As long as you generate a sustainable profit (economic growth) with the lend money the total figures are irrelevant.

The key issue is the time lapse for the benefits to accrue.

The big problem has been Pakistan's depressed GCF for more than 2 decades now. This means there is little scope for short term/mid term returns (because there is little "new" GCF base to build this upon and the human capital is just not good enough overall to circumvent this either)....forcing everything to be long term investment return wise, which is effectively a gamble because many things can happen in that time period (both good and bad). During that time the debt will have to be serviced, adding to the overall strain.

The good news is that China has put lower than market rates for these, but the problem with that is it does not hold Pakistan's feet to the fire (and thus prompt good quality GCF through natural selection etc). Its a tough spot Pakistan is in, I for one do not see much overall value addition of the CPEC route compared to just massive container shipping with the regular routes flowing out of Shanghai and HK through the malacca straits. It hedges during wartime somewhat, but the massive financial cost dividends are just not there for land based commerce of most goods. There is the energy pipeline side of it, if it can be connected with Middle East and Central Asia sure....but thats not going to provide the jobs or income that a country approaching 200 million people needs....nor should such a plan require this level of debt ballooning.
 
.
The key issue is the time lapse for the benefits to accrue.

The big problem has been Pakistan's depressed GCF for more than 2 decades now. This means there is little scope for short term/mid term returns (because there is little "new" GCF base to build this upon and the human capital is just not good enough overall to circumvent this either)....forcing everything to be long term investment return wise, which is effectively a gamble because many things can happen in that time period (both good and bad). During that time the debt will have to be serviced, adding to the overall strain.

The good news is that China has put lower than market rates for these, but the problem with that is it does not hold Pakistan's feet to the fire (and thus prompt good quality GCF through natural selection etc). Its a tough spot Pakistan is in, I for one do not see much overall value addition of the CPEC route compared to just massive container shipping with the regular routes flowing out of Shanghai and HK through the malacca straits. It hedges during wartime somewhat, but the massive financial cost dividends are just not there for land based commerce of most goods. There is the energy pipeline side of it, if it can be connected with Middle East and Central Asia sure....but thats not going to provide the jobs or income that a country approaching 200 million people needs....nor should such a plan require this level of debt ballooning.

2/3rd of CPEC financing has to do with power generation projects
the ROI promised to the investors in the power generation projects are secret
It is not clear how they will play out
 
.
The key issue is the time lapse for the benefits to accrue.

The big problem has been Pakistan's depressed GCF for more than 2 decades now. This means there is little scope for short term/mid term returns (because there is little "new" GCF base to build this upon and the human capital is just not good enough overall to circumvent this either)....forcing everything to be long term investment return wise, which is effectively a gamble because many things can happen in that time period (both good and bad). During that time the debt will have to be serviced, adding to the overall strain.

The good news is that China has put lower than market rates for these, but the problem with that is it does not hold Pakistan's feet to the fire (and thus prompt good quality GCF through natural selection etc). Its a tough spot Pakistan is in, I for one do not see much overall value addition of the CPEC route compared to just massive container shipping with the regular routes flowing out of Shanghai and HK through the malacca straits. It hedges during wartime somewhat, but the massive financial cost dividends are just not there for land based commerce of most goods. There is the energy pipeline side of it, if it can be connected with Middle East and Central Asia sure....but thats not going to provide the jobs or income that a country approaching 200 million people needs....nor should such a plan require this level of debt ballooning.

Having China as Pakistan's main creditor is not a burden at all; on the contrary: it is a very big advantage in this case, which India simply hasn't. Traditional investors only see the financial aspects and profits, China also considers geopolitical implications, which means Pakistan is more important than financial benefits in case of doubt. I hope you understand my point. My English isn't very well.
 
.
Having China as Pakistan's main creditor is not a burden at all; on the contrary: it is a very big advantage in this case, which India simply hasn't. Traditional investors only see the financial aspects and profits, China also considers geopolitical implications, which means Pakistan is more important than financial benefits in case of doubt. I hope you understand my point. My English isn't very well.

if China wants to go down the path of pouring money in a sinkhole it is their business
 
.
Back
Top Bottom