What's new

Pakistani Terror Groups Named In Heart of Asia Declaration

agamdilawari

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 31, 2012
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
Member nations at the Heart of Asia Summit, Amritsar, in a declaration have condemned terror and vowed to fight state sponsored terrorism of Pakistan.

A strongly worded terror declaration named Pakistan terror groups – JeM, LeT and Haqqani – as the fountain heads of terror.

The declaration read, “We remain concerned by high level of violence in Afghan caused by Taliban, terrorist groups including ISIL/DAISHand its affiliates Let, JeM etc.”

For the 44 nations at the conference, eliminating terrorism is the core issue.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley speaking at the joint press conference with Afghanistan's Deputy FM Karzai at the Heart of Asia said the declaration also recognized terrorism as biggest threat to peace and demanded immediate end to all forms of terrorism.

The resolution which demanded end to all forms of terror activities read: “Acknowledging support that terrorism derives in our region; demand immediate end to all forms of terrorism, as well as support & financing to it. strongly call for concerted regional & international cooperation to ensure elimination of terrorism in all its forms including dismantling of terrorist safe havens in the Heart of Asia region, as well as disrupting all financial & logistical support for terrorism.”

The Amritsar Declaration further read, ”We recognize the necessity of taking serious measures to address recruitment of youth to extremist &terrorist networks. We realise radicalisation of youth can only be prevented by effective de-radicalisation strategies involving all Heart of Asia countries.”

Here's the link to the "Amritsar Declaration" adopted at the 6th Ministerial Conference of Heart of Asia.

http://www.timesnow.tv/india/article/pak-terror-groups-named-in-amritsar-declaration/52623
 
. . .
What about the Indian terror groups and Afghani terrorists?
 
. .
Then why did taklu azziz come to India one day early ? :lol:



Nobody in Asia believed your stories :devil:

Not one out of 40 countries in attendence :P

Care to explain? was you there at the conference?
 
.
LOL..... it would have been better if you had given your worthless advice to takloo azziz to stay away from India.

Quite shameless of him to come here.

Yes better to keep away from shyt and shytty people.
 
. . .
Watch your curry mouth indick before abusing Mr Aziz... hes not a fudi fenku or pussiker.

Your exhortation not to call Sartaj Aziz names would have meant something had you not accompanied it by calling names in return. As such, all that it makes you look like is a hypocrite.

But let me guess - you don't care. That most famous response from across the Western Border to anything in the world which does not favour them. Problem is, this way you will very soon run out of things to care about.
 
.
Your exhortation not to call Sartaj Aziz names would have meant something had you not accompanied it by calling names in return. As such, all that it makes you look like is a hypocrite.

But let me guess - you don't care. That most famous response from across the Western Border to anything in the world which does not favour them. Problem is, this way you will very soon run out of things to care about.

Were fine!

What action would you want us to do for our enemies?

They are named in the declaration signed by all 40 participating members.....so yes, it matters a lot :lol:

Why whats happening?
 
. .
Were fine!

What action would you want us to do for our enemies?



Why whats happening?

The point is not whether you care about your self-defined "enemies." The point is whether you care about not being a hypocrite:

- Calling names while expecting others not to.
- Expecting peace while wishing ill to others.
- Indulging in asymmetric war and expecting a symmetric response.
- Never failing to hype up any diplomatic development viewed positively while totally discounting those that are negative.

...and so on.
 
.
The point is not whether you care about your self-defined "enemies." The point is whether you care about not being a hypocrite:

- Calling names while expecting others not to.
- Expecting peace while wishing ill to others.
- Indulging in asymmetric war and expecting a symmetric response.
- Never failing to hype up any diplomatic development viewed positively while totally discounting those that are negative.

...and so on.

India is not our self defined enemy

It is our enemy in occupation of Kashmir

We owe nothing to india except emnity our singular focus should be how to hurt our enemies not make it easy or better for them

Afghan government is our enemy so why should Pakistan help them in any way?

We are in a war where no ground is given unless anything tangible apart from your Randi Rona happened why would we take note otger then reaffirm our efforts against our enemies?
 
.
India is not our self defined enemy

It is our enemy in occupation of Kashmir

We owe nothing to india except emnity our singular focus should be how to hurt our enemies not make it easy or better for them

Afghan government is our enemy so why should Pakistan help them in any way?

We are in a war where no ground is given unless anything tangible apart from your Randi Rona happened why would we take note otger then reaffirm our efforts against our enemies?

Of course if you had any courage, or integrity, you would have fist DECLARED war.

Not fight a proxy war like a terrorist using illiterate desperate men to die for your fantasy.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom