What's new

Pakistan vindicated: Modi’s Balochistan reference self-incriminating: Aziz

Max

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 3, 2014
Messages
8,411
Reaction score
-3
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
ISLAMABAD: The Indian prime minister’s reference to Balochistan in his Independence Day speech drew a blistering rebuke from Islamabad with the country’s top foreign policy wizard saying Narendra Modi’s toxic remarks vindicated Pakistan’s stance that New Delhi is fomenting terrorism in the volatile province.

Pakistani intelligence agencies arrested an agent of India’s Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) while crossing into Balochistan from neighbouring Iran in March this year. Kulbushan Yadav, a senior officer of the Indian navy, confessed in a subsequent video statement that RAW was stoking unrest in Pakistan, especially in Balochistan and Karachi.

“[Narendra] Modi’s reference to Balochistan, which is an integral part of Pakistan, only proves Pakistan’s contention that India through its main intelligence agency RAW has been fomenting terrorism in Balochistan,” Sartaj Aziz, the prime minister adviser on foreign policy, said in a statement issued by the Foreign Office in Islamabad.

“This was also confirmed by the public confession of RAW’s active service naval officer, Kulbhushan Yadav,” he added.

Aziz said Modi was only trying to divert world attention from the grim tragedy that has been unfolding in the Indian Kashmir over the past five weeks. The disputed Himalayan region has been gripped by a fresh wave of unrest triggered by the killing of a popular young separatist Burhan Wani on July 8.

Indian forces clamped a curfew in the disputed valley and unleashed brute force to quell the uprising, killing dozens and injuring thousands of innocent Kashmiris. However, they have failed to dent the resolve of the Kashmiri people.

“Thousands of unarmed youth are protesting every day for their right to self-determination. More than 70 innocent Kashmiris have been killed and more than 6000 injured. There is constant curfew and complete media blackout for the past 37 days,” Aziz said. “These events have nothing to do with terrorism. It is an indigenous movement for self-determination, a right promised to the Kashmiris by the UN Security Council.”

Aziz also strongly contested Modi’s assertion equating Azad Kashmir situation with the Indian controlled part. “At this time, the contrast between the Indian Occupied Kashmir and the Azad Jammu and Kashmir could not be starker.”

The foreign policy adviser said India was a large country, in fact the second largest in the world, but a large country did not automatically become a great country, especially when it unleashed such brute force against innocent citizens to suppress their right to protest or when it deliberately used pallet guns to permanently destroy the eyesight of over 100 young Kashmiris.

“India should recognise that the core issue of Kashmir cannot be resolved by bullets. It requires a political solution, through serious negotiations between India and Pakistan.”

In a related development, Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry called in India’s high commissioner Monday afternoon and handed him a letter addressed to his Indian counterpart, inviting him to visit Pakistan for talks on the Kashmir dispute that “has been the main bone of contention between India and Pakistan”.

“The letter highlights the international obligation of both the countries, India and Pakistan, to resolve the Jammu and Kashmir dispute in accordance with the UN Security Council resolutions,” said a Foreign Office statement. But Pakistan’s move is unlikely to get a positive response from the neighbour as India has already made it clear that no talks could take place unless Islamabad addressed its concerns on terrorism.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 16th, 2016.
 
.
It is no use blaming India. This whole thing is started by Pakistan. Pakistan started fueling Kashmir unrest by issuing provocative statements and using proxies to create violence during all the month. Although, I am against using Balochistan against Kashmir - there are better ways Modi should have employed, Pakistan failed to bring India to tables. You simply cannot point a gun, and ask the other party to come to tables.
 
.
Not only India even Europe leaders are voicing against Human Rights violations. So so be it...

But one thing nothing else happening in Pakistan except Kashmir issue. On the other hand India is developing it's military and economical power. Wonder why no educated Pakistanis not getting this simple issue?
 
.
Actually even congress has realized folly of modi' s strategy...

Its only matter of time now that khalistan is raised by pakistan...in response...as undisputed territory is no more off limits...

Now calculate who will be in more trouble your selves
 
.
Actually even congress has realized folly of modi' s strategy...

Its only matter of time now that khalistan is raised by pakistan...in response...as undisputed territory is no more off limits...

Now calculate who will be in more trouble your selves

Way to go Modi!......wait n see:enjoy:
 
.
The fact that India’s Prime Minister himself has spoken of Baluchistan from the ramparts of the Red Fort when entire foreign diplomatic corps was present has vindicated Pakistan’s stance that New Delhi is fomenting terrorism in the volatile province. A huge shift in New Delhi's policy ... Whether India gains (or loses) anything from this is yet to be seen, but the Indians have greatly damaged the Baluch cause. From now on, the Baluch resistance/insurgency will be largely seen/suspected as Indian-funded/supported movement .... In fact, India has made Pakistan's "work" in Baluchistan much easier now ...
 
. .
this guy Aziz! he must be getting paid extra for embarrassing himself every day! Are all Pakistani leaders picked based on how shameless they are?

Modi simply utters the word Balochistaan and everyone in Pakistan shaken up!
 
.
The fact that India’s Prime Minister himself has spoken of Baluchistan from the ramparts of the Red Fort when entire foreign diplomatic corps was present has vindicated Pakistan’s stance that New Delhi is fomenting terrorism in the volatile province. A huge shift in New Delhi's policy ... Whether India gains (or loses) anything from this is yet to be seen, but the Indians have greatly damaged the Baluch cause. From now on, the Baluch resistance/insurgency will be largely seen/suspected as Indian-funded/supported movement .... In fact, India has made Pakistan's "work" in Baluchistan much easier now ...

India never said it supports Baluchistan movement. What it says it that you have no business poking into India's matter, when Pakistan itself violates human rights in Balochistan. You may be the only country that bombs your own citizens and allows other powers to bomb them too.
 
.
.
modi said people congradulated him from Baluchistan for raising a voice...

that was a lie...

but if we say Khalistan once..... our sikh bretheren will be estatic... I tell you that

Remember India's economy is 8 times larger than your, and 7 times larger. in size. In case of tit for tat proxy war, you guys will go bankrupt in months.
 
. .
The fact that India’s Prime Minister himself has spoken of Baluchistan from the ramparts of the Red Fort when entire foreign diplomatic corps was present has vindicated Pakistan’s stance that New Delhi is fomenting terrorism in the volatile province. A huge shift in New Delhi's policy ... Whether India gains (or loses) anything from this is yet to be seen, but the Indians have greatly damaged the Baluch cause. From now on, the Baluch resistance/insurgency will be largely seen/suspected as Indian-funded/supported movement .... In fact, India has made Pakistan's "work" in Baluchistan much easier now ...

tch tch...over reaching here are we?

Nothing Modi said indicates support for terrorism. He just acknowledged the difficulties faced by Baloch people and raised India's voice on behalf of the victims of state aggression.

But just the fact it has rankled Pakistan so much makes it clear that lot can be done on this front within bounds of International law and conventions if Pakistan continues glorifying and exporting terrorists to India.
 
.
feel good comment, you also have 7 times large population and much more to save compared to Pakistan..

The underlying point is economy matters in case of wars or proxy wars. You may disagree.
 
.
The underlying point is economy matters in case of wars or proxy wars. You may disagree.

You are right, but i think India have more fault lines compared to Pakistan.. we will shortly make life of Indian hell with little budgets if situation arise..

well i like the reply of our FO, they are showing rationality compared to desperate Modi govt..
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom