What's new

Pakistan to host anti-nuclear conference on Dec 8-9

Moin91

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
2,338
Reaction score
0
Monday, September 17, 2007

A consultative meeting of civil society, academia and trade union representatives has decided to hold an international anti-nuclear conference on Dec 8-9, 2007, in Pakistan as part of the anti-weapons movement.

The venue of the conference will be announced later. The conference will have speakers and participants mainly from South Asia but a number of participants from Europe and other parts of the world would also be invited.

The main objective of the conference is to seek an understanding on a “nuclear free South Asia”.

This decision was taken in a consultative meeting held here at PILER Centre on Sunday under the aegis of Pakistan Peace Coalition (PPC). The meeting was attended by PPC president Dr A.H. Nayyar, B.M. Kutty, M.B. Naqvi, Dr Jaffar Ahmed, Dr Tipu Sultan, Karamat Ali, Rahat Saeed, Ms Sheen Farukh, Aftab Nabi, Mohammad Tahseen, Gafar Malik, Ramzan Memon and others.

The meeting noted that the recent Indo-US nuclear deal has renewed the arms race between India and Pakistan, two nuclear rivals, which poses a great threat to the entire South Asian region.

It was also noted that the two countries are spending a huge chunk of their budget on arms leaving very little allocation for social development. As a result, a large number of the population in both India and Pakistan is deprived of basic facilities such as clear drinking water, education and sanitation.

The meeting was told that India and Pakistan spent 20 and four billion US dollars respectively on defence expenditures in the year 2005.

The meeting decided that it was high time that civil society organisations take serious note of this ‘madness’ and resist attempts of further nuclearisation in the region. There is a need to mobilise people against nuclear as well as conventional arms, the meeting resolved.

Dr A.H. Nayyar, president of the PPC, while addressing the conference, gave a briefing about a recently-held conference in Delhi and said that there is very strong anti-arms movement in India, which is opposing the Indo-US nuclear deal. “There is a need to have such an initiative in Pakistan and to build networks with other peace moments in the region,” he added.

He said that Pakistan has increased its capacity to prepare up to 40 nuclear weapons a year and huge resources are being diverted to weapons building. “This is nothing but madness,” he added.

Karamat Ali, Executive Director PILER and a peace activist said that every second day we read a small news item that Pakistan has tested a new missile which has the capacity to carry nuclear weapons. “This is a very dangerous trend and poses a great threat to the people of Pakistan and the region,” he added.

He said both India and Pakistan have gone ‘crazy’ building nuclear and conventional weapons. Karamat said that India has already announced that it will spent US$10 billion on buying and building conventional arms this year and that amount will go up to US$50 billion in the next five years.

Dr Tipu Sultan, a representative of Pakistan Medical Association (PMA) and Doctors for Peace and Development, explained the dangers of a possible nuclear blast and said that the threat is un-imaginable. “We don’t have the infrastructure to treat victims of smaller incidents leave alone a catastrophe such as a nuclear blast,” he added.

The meeting also decided that before holding the conference in December, smaller forums will be held on the topic and the first such forum will take place on Sept 21 in Hyderabad.

The meeting also noted that that there is a lack of awareness among the masses on the subject and people have been given false information, such as notions that nuclear weapons are a form of deterrence. It was decided that an anti-nuclearisation awareness campaign would be launched.

A majority of the participants also suggested consulting political parties on the issue and making anti-nuclearisation an agenda item of civil society during the elections.

The meeting also endorsed the joint resolution passed at the “Indo-US Nuclear Deal Conference” held on August 31 and September 1 in New Delhi.

The resolution said that the India-US deal would aggravate the nuclear arms race in South Asia and in the Asian continent as whole, and would further weaken the already feeble momentum towards regional and global disarmament.

It further said that there are serious misgivings about the deal in other South Asian countries including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. As a result of the deal, Pakistan is also accelerating its fissile material production efforts.

A seven-member committee was formed for the preparation of the conference to be held in December 2007.


Pakistan to host anti-nuclear conference on Dec 8-9
 
.
This guy Dr Nayyar and all of his ilk, there mind seems to be filled with ****. Are they so stupid to understand the significance of the nuclear detterent for pakistan. Or do they want another 71 to happen. Why dont we understand that pakistan needs to rely on her nuclear and missle shield to counter a much much bigger enemy which otherwise seems impossible. The nuclear that they criticize has in reality kept both the nation from attacking each other.
 
.
Indians are very apprehensive of pak nukes. they r scared that one fine morning those nukes are going to come hurlting towards indian cities. this might be the effect of propoganda, but all the same, indian citizens are apprehensive.
 
.
Indians are very apprehensive of pak nukes. they r scared that one fine morning those nukes are going to come hurlting towards indian cities. this might be the effect of propoganda, but all the same, indian citizens are apprehensive.
Likewise, but I do agree with the guy, the only way to not be afraid of nukes is for India/Pak to BOTH take nukes out of the equation.

Pakistan is a nuclear weapons power country ready, willing and looking forward to disarm. But not without India doing so as well.
 
.
Any why exactly should we disarm? We have achieved something and something after great sacrifise by our scientists, our people, the government and pakistan as a whole. Sactions after sactions were imposed on us and yet we manage to achieve this great success all for what so that one day we could disarm ourselves. Seriously this is as absurd as it sounds.
 
.
Any why exactly should we disarm? We have achieved something and something after great sacrifise by our scientists, our people, the government and pakistan as a whole. Sactions after sactions were imposed on us and yet we manage to achieve this great success all for what so that one day we could disarm ourselves. Seriously this is as absurd as it sounds.

These so called intellectuals should get Russia, China and USA to throw their nukes away followed by UK and France. Then the rest can follow. We need a nuclear free world.
 
.
Likewise, but I do agree with the guy, the only way to not be afraid of nukes is for India/Pak to BOTH take nukes out of the equation.

Pakistan is a nuclear weapons power country ready, willing and looking forward to disarm. But not without India doing so as well.

For Pak to disarm, India has to disarm
For India to disarm, China has to disarm
For China to disarm, USA has to disarm
For USA to disarm, Russia has to disarm

and I cant see all those nations disarming.
 
.
For Pak to disarm, India has to disarm
For India to disarm, China has to disarm
For China to disarm, USA has to disarm
For USA to disarm, Russia has to disarm

and I cant see all those nations disarming.

Well said, i was just going to post the same thing. India cant disarm its nukes, because CHina is the main threat to India, who will never disarm.
 
.
India has never said it would disarm if China disarms.

To be fair neither has China ever said that it would disarm if the US and so on, Russia does.

Pak's a unique nation in that sort that openly says this.
 
.
Just saying it doesnt mean anything. Every nation acts according to its percieved threats.
 
.
Pak's a unique nation in that sort that openly says this.

Because seriously either we are out of our minds or perhaps we are trying to prove something to the world here, which no one seems to bother listening too.
No way in hell is india going to roll back her nuclear program, same stands for china and russia. US on the other hand shouts with her loud mouth about the disarmment and how iran should not posses nuclear technology even for the peaceful purpose, yet allign them selves with india's nuclear ambitions to counter china.
We are living in the world of utter hyprocasy, so saying pakistan wants to see southasia a nuclear free zone makes us look stupid. The only thing what we can do and the we have started doing it though late but still the government realized it is to step up our nuclear program. This is the only way to go forward. Thinking otherwise is just like living in fools paradise.
 
.
Any why exactly should we disarm? We have achieved something and something after great sacrifise by our scientists, our people, the government and pakistan as a whole. Sactions after sactions were imposed on us and yet we manage to achieve this great success all for what so that one day we could disarm ourselves. Seriously this is as absurd as it sounds.

These so called intellectuals should get Russia, China and USA to throw their nukes away followed by UK and France. Then the rest can follow. We need a nuclear free world.

Good posts
 
.
Good posts

yes they are all good post :)
i want to see these two post as sticky for all users to read first before posting and pointing fingers to one another nation.

I would like to add that
it was the United States that created the nuclear weapon used it first before any nation and still is.

Russia created some time after

china created cus the united states THREATED CHINA IF IT EVER CONSIDER COMMUNIST RULE, IT WILL NUKE EERY CITY !
 
.
India has never said it would disarm if China disarms.

To be fair neither has China ever said that it would disarm if the US and so on, Russia does.

Pak's a unique nation in that sort that openly says this.

When did Pakistan openly say that it wants to disarm? Can you provide some links?
As for this conference....it is quite clearly an independent conference which has nothing to do with Mushy's government.
 
.
Nuclear weapons are not as dangerous as people perceive. After all, they have prevented the cold war turning hot. as long as they sit in their silos, they r peacekeepers.

This conference should be about safeguarding nukes, not about disarming. Every nation has the duty to make 100% sure that their nukes never fall into the wrong hands.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom