What's new

"Pakistan to continue giving air, ground access, says Pentagon"

 
.
my dear friend which aircraft need refueling over Afghanistan ? :D

C-17 have 1000km range ??????? as soon as they takeoff from afghanistna they need fuel ?

as i know c-17 have range of some 10390km :hitwall:

I said USAF, which encompasses all aircraft. Did I mention C-17?
 
.
.
one side our leaders lying we are not giving bases to USA other sides look at the massive movement over paksitani they off transponders and flying over pakistan.
KC-135 oven pakistan
View attachment 744810


c-17 just went out
View attachment 744811


KC-10 just landing now in dubai
View attachment 744812

This just reflects the treacherous nature of the so called Civilian and Military leaders in Pakistan. They say something but their actions are entirely different. And that is why Powers such as China and Russia still look at Pakistan with suspicion, and regional countries such as Iran and others just do not trust Pakistan.
 
. .
World Bank recently praised the Ehsaas e Bhutto program in Pakistan.
 
.
This just reflects the treacherous nature of the so called Civilian and Military leaders in Pakistan. They say something but their actions are entirely different. And that is why Powers such as China and Russia still look at Pakistan with suspicion, and regional countries such as Iran and others just do not trust Pakistan.
Bhai ap personally ja k USA ko mana kardo aur jo jawab milay na tw mjhay bhi btana wapis aa k.
 
.
Bhai ap personally ja k USA ko mana kardo aur jo jawab milay na tw mjhay bhi btana wapis aa k.
IMF finance minister should tax it and add more taxpayer to the Pakistanische Reich captured by the Saintly Kahn.
 
.
IMF finance minister should tax it and add more taxpayer to the Pakistanische Reich captured by the Saintly Kahn.
Jbh ab tw tax lagana chaiya Alocks aur Glocks pay. Par @ARMalik might be going to give US a shutup call on using the boulevard. He do not want Pakistan to earn more juicy US dollars.
 
.
Jbh ab tw tax lagana chaiya Alocks aur Glocks pay. Par @ARMalik might be going to give US a shutup call on using the boulevard. He do not want Pakistan to earn more juicy US dollars.

Shabbar Zaidi can help calculate the operational cost and calculate Sin tax on it.

Meanwhile Gaia bags will sue US for causing environmental harm to the hemp plantation of the Narco Khans.

OP should bury the past with US.
 
.
sadly .. quam ko khirat pa lagaya howa ha...
 
.
this is what i am saying too bhai kcs are escorting fighters over afghanistan and using for afghan missions via pakistani air space . they land in pakistan or not they are start using our airspace for afghan military missions . what a shame .how paf feel when see USAF fighters and tankers flying in their airspace ?
Paf doesn't feel anything
They are proud to fly f16s. How can they feel bad about usaf flying over pak.
Bhai ap personally ja k USA ko mana kardo aur jo jawab milay na tw mjhay bhi btana wapis aa k.
Stop using roman urdu FFS.. Try urdu via Google translate instead.
Should be no surprise. Read my posts on the "no bases thread". USA doesn't need bases inside Pakistan, only over flight access. A complete break with USA is not on the cards for Pakistan. USA and Pakistan will have to develop a new working relationship independent of India or China. It will centered on counter terrorism and economic development.

Bad joke
 
.
O bhai may be Pakistan allow them to take there heavy equipments from Afghanistan through this route & thats it so they can early leave Afghanistan...
Leave the equipment for Pakistan's rebuilding efforts in Afghanistan.
 
.
one side our leaders lying we are not giving bases to USA other sides look at the massive movement over paksitani they off transponders and flying over pakistan.
KC-135 oven pakistan
View attachment 744810


c-17 just went out
View attachment 744811


KC-10 just landing now in dubai
View attachment 744812
Your 20 years late in making this discovery. Since 2001 invasion of Afghanistan Musharaf's government gave a strip of air over Balochistan to USAF to use for it's logistics for Afghanistan? How else do you think America and NATO has been supplying their forces? Over Iran?

They use Gulf Arab countries as hubs and then fly over what they call "the boulevard" over Pakistan which was given by Musharaf and has been followed by every Pakistani government since then.


bul.png
 
.
Got to get out of Afghanistan some how. USA will continue to require Pakistani airspace long after this for access to hit Al-Qaeda types. Better for Pakistan to continue counter terror cooperation.
What alternative do you suggest? We are in no shape to say no and have a complete break with the USA. Cooperation is the best approach.....for the withdrawal and against OBL types.

Have some shame.. If it was up to trecherous Jafars like You, Pakistan would be given to the Americans on a silver plater, we're in this dire economic situations becuase of cooperating with said B4stards, Your so called WOT cost us quarter of a trillion USD and then some, and countless lives including butchering our Soldiers in broad daylight pakistan is no safer now then it was when Musharaf agreed to 'cooperate' in a one sided master slave relationship.. we should only have a strictly mutual business relationship anything other then that they can f*** off. Find other ways to suck up to them... Pakistan is not for sale. In reality they see Pakistan no more than a canon fodder to promote their own interests in the region, they promised investment but instead they put sanctions and then they have the nerve to tell the Chinese to back off on CPEC.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom