What's new

Pakistan SUPPORTED India for U.N. Seat

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Pak’s vote for India at UNSC is ‘significant’: Indian envoy
The Hindu : News / International : Pak’s vote for India at UNSC is ‘significant’: Indian envoy

India was elected to the UN Security Council as a non-permanent member with a thumping majority of votes, including that of Pakistan, in what was quickly described by New Delhi as significant.

“Of course it is of significance,” said Hardeep Singh Puri, India’s envoy to the UN, in response to a question of whether India viewed this positively.

“It proves that those who are sceptical on India-Pakistan cooperation in the UN... it proves them wrong,” he told PTI, after the vote.

Only a day earlier, however, diplomats both countries had argued about Kashmir at the UN with Congress MP Charan Das Mahant asserting that Kashmir was an integral part of India, “and that its people have regularly expressed their will in free and fair elections“.

Pakistani delegate Tahir Andrabi who had spoken later said, no electoral exercise in Jammu and Kashmir can substitute a “free and impartial plebiscite” mandated by Security Council resolutions.

Puri, however, stressed that India and Pakistan had not clashed over Kashmir but were reiterating their longstanding positions.

“Yesterday what happened was not a spat,” the Indian diplomat said.

“I’m not going to comment on Pakistan’s statement... India’s position is crystal clear... Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India... Jammu and Kashmir has periodic franchise through elections,” he added.

While India got 187 votes out of 191, with one country abstaining, two of the other three votes went to Pakistan and Swaziland.

Since the voting is done by secret ballot, it is not clear who cast those votes. Puri, however, confirmed it was not Pakistan.

“As long as I know that Pakistan voted for India, it doesn’t matter who in a mischievous way cast a vote for Pakistan,” Puri said.

“It was clearly designed to create a bit of confusion,” he said.

India, which is a founding member of the UN, is returning to the Security Council after a gap of 19 years.

It has been on the Council six times before-having last served in 1992.

India’s term for the next two year begins in January 2011.

Pakistan also supported the US-India Nuke deal but India in return thanked Pakistan by blocking the Pakistan-China civilian nuke deal.
 
Pakistan also supported the US-India Nuke deal but India in return thanked Pakistan by blocking the Pakistan-China civilian nuke deal.

Pakistan Had No leverage or Power to Stop Indo-US Nuclear Deal..Deal was Cleared by Nuclear Supplier Groups and IAEA Later
 
Pakistan also supported the US-India Nuke deal but India in return thanked Pakistan by blocking the Pakistan-China civilian nuke deal.


Excerpt:

Pakistan warned the international community that a deal allowing India to import US atomic fuel and technology could accelerate a nuclear arms race between Delhi and Islamabad.

The warning was made in a letter addressed to more than 60 nations as the Indian Government, having survived a no-confidence vote on Tuesday, dispatched diplomats to clear the deal with international regulators.

Later, in a concession to Islamabad, the United States said that it planned to shift $230 million (£116 million) in aid to Pakistan away from counter-terrorism to upgrading its F16 fighter jets seen as crucial for maintaining military parity with India.
 
The traitor Haroon Abdullah is said to be hands in glove with Indian envoy in UN.

Both travel together to every function. The Pakistani traitor envoy has also damaged Pakistani stand on Kashmir during recent sessions of UN assembly over the issue.
 
The traitor Haroon Abdullah is said to be hands in glove with Indian envoy in UN.

Both travel together to every function. The Pakistani traitor envoy has also damaged Pakistani stand on Kashmir during recent sessions of UN assembly over the issue.

why blame a single guy? I don't think he can take the decision in favor of India all by himself.

OTH, I lolled at the news. shows that pakistani politicians can only make statements.:rofl:
 
We have a chanakya strategy which some Pakistani Members fail to see.We did the right thing by supporting Indo US Nuclear Deal at the end because you see now we're getting reactors from China and world can't do ****.We can simply show them their hypocrisy and call it a day.
 
why blame a single guy? I don't think he can take the decision in favor of India all by himself.

It is very important to mention his betrayal with Pakistan.

Being Pak envoy in UN he is supposed to take a tough stand and raise questions as per rules of UN during the session on Kashmir.

He avoided exercising this right during the discussion session and rather let a junior assistant to do so on Kashmir.


Besides he always travel with Indian envoy to all diplomatic functions.


He is damaging Pakistani stand on many issues viz a viz Indian aggression, terrorism in Kashmir and Pakistan
 
We have a chanakya strategy which some Pakistani Members fail to see.We did the right thing by supporting Indo US Nuclear Deal at the end because you see now we're getting reactors from China and world can't do ****.We can simply show them their hypocrisy and call it a day.

oh to hell with the deal. That is non issue we cant do much about it.

talk about the relevant topic i.e Pakistani traitors supporting India in UN
 
The traitor Haroon Abdullah is said to be hands in glove with Indian envoy in UN.

Both travel together to every function. The Pakistani traitor envoy has also damaged Pakistani stand on Kashmir during recent sessions of UN assembly over the issue.

traitor envoy....lol
the envoy is selected by pakistan govt. to represent pakistan in UN.he is just like a spoke person,who states the country's stand on a issue.
he has no right or can't decide the foreign policy of your country by his own.it's the decision of your foreign policy makers,which he was acted upon.
you should scold your foreign policy makers rather than the rubber stamp ..:D
 
So what??? It is just a temporary arrangement and after the end of term India would be back where it belongs to. No need to make fuss over it. :azn:
 
traitor envoy....lol
the envoy is selected by pakistan govt. to represent pakistan in UN.he is just like a spoke person,who states the country's stand on a issue.
he has no right or can't decide the foreign policy of your country by his own.it's the decision of your foreign policy makers,which he was acted upon.
you should scold your foreign policy makers rather than the rubber stamp ..

Our Envoy to US Mr Hussain Haqqani is also appointed by Our Govt. He has been issuing visas to Blackwater and CIA agents. We Pakistanis having many reservations over Zardari Govt's decisions which are harming Pakistan.


This is one of such decisions which are against Pakistan hence anyone that acts against Pakistan is a traitor even if its a president.
 
So if Pakistan voted against India, what would that accomplish ? Nothing right, so why bother talking about it
 

Military Forum Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom