What's new

Pakistan should first respect India before resumption of cricket: BCCI

.
F**k off! I want Pakistan to plan its cricket calendar without India.
 
. . . .
I think BCCI don't follow sehwag and sir jadeja on twitter.
has an ali is a Pakistani and he can do what he want on his own land.
Why can't shahid afridi talk on Kashmir when we too have half of it. why can't he talk on atrocities of indian army when almost every Indian cricket in the past have supported ceasefire violation by undan army and the so called sir g kal strike.
 
.
Think need some re-posting and reiteration...



Why India is not playing cricket, rhyme and reasons.

- Fear of loosing to Pakistan, loosing to Pakistan in India is a huge politically damaging thing to current hardliners BJP. Lots of political repercussion there.

- Fear of Pakistan getting into the groove...goes against the current BJP govt. policy of isolating Pakistan.

-PCB will earn handsome money, its not that BCCI will not earn, they will earn huge, many times more than PCB but if the idea is to hurt PCB and Pakistan...this is a fine for them, their govt. policy.

So a failure for PCB is deemed as failing Pakistan and this failure is viewed as a success for India...can't get any lower than this, low brow and pathetic thoughts, sadistic as well, a new lowest of the low from India.
 
.
Well from what I know, shameless are those who keep own requesting (read begging) even after repeated humiliation. LOL :omghaha::omghaha::omghaha:
Doesnt look good from a The mouth of a shameless retard who is more interested in chest thumping for not playing rather than worrying about over 700 millions shameless endians who defacate openly. What a piece of shit you and your country is. I am happy for mr. Seth I for his trolling to endians.

You must be feeling proud and over the moon having your own toilet while living in uk.
 
.
Then what is he lamenting about & why ?

To honor something that BCCI agreed to

BCCI meanwhile expected him to understand english which would help him realise the relevance of the document he bandies about . This evidently was a tall order.

He perfectly knows the relevance of that document. He however is not satisfied with the excuses that BCCI has given till now.

Now, this is surprising , considering he comes from a nation like Pakistan which has similar traits & has been on the receiving end of most exchanges with India.

What similar traits? I don't remember PCB running away from any game saying "our jawans are dying at LOC, we won't play with you".
 
.
What similar traits?

Refer the underlined part in post No 60. Thats the common trait.
He perfectly knows the relevance of that document. He however is not satisfied with the excuses that BCCI has given till now.

In which case , he can take a hop step & jump. BCCI has been as polite as it could thus far & as mentioned by me in post No 1 , which part of " No thank you" can he & PCB not understand ?

There was no Pakistan then.

... and what happened when Pakistan happened ?

It took nearly a decade to shed the ' enslaved ' status of the British Head of State !!
 
.
When we haven't severed bilateral trade, no restriction on artists, poets, scholars visiting eachother's countries on regular basis I see no reason to bar playing cricket on the basis of mere security reasons. Though it was just an expression of interest and not a legal contract which means Pakistan is going to get not a single penny from BCCI, cricket should resume.
 
.
Refer the underlined part in post No 60. Thats the common trait.

Nope not exactly. That is reserved specially for you.

In which case , he can take a hop step & jump. BCCI has been as polite as it could thus far & as mentioned by me in post No 1 , which part of " No thank you" can he & PCB not understand ?

Sure.

I would ask PCB to move on and let BCCI whine for many different lame reasons.
 
. .
shame less India only country in the world that brings politics into sport in 2018

what a $hit mentality Indians have.
Indeed ?

Check the number of nations who boycotted or were kept out Olympics for political reasons , it might help you.

Some leads:

In 1936, Spain boycotted the Berlin Games over political differences with the host country and tried (and failed) to setup an alternate event with labor and socialist groups. In the same year, Ireland boycotted over the division of Northern Ireland from their official team. The United States considered boycotting these Games over Hitler’s treatment of Jews, but a flawed fact-finding mission convinced the nation to send competitors.

The two 1936 boycotts set a precedent that was used many times in the 20th century.

The 1956 Melbourne Games had three sets of boycotts. Liechtenstein, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden boycotted over the Soviet Union’s invasion of Hungary. In a separate political demonstration, Egypt, Lebanon, and Iraq boycotted over the Suez crisis.

That same year, The People’s Republic of China (PRC) refused to participate alongside The Republic of China, more commonly known as Taiwan. This dispute would last for 32 years, with the PRC only returning to the Games in 1984.

Twenty-six African nations boycotted the 1976 Montreal Games because the IOC refused to ban New Zealand for participating in a rugby tour in then-banned South Africa (more on this later.)

The Cold War-era saw a variety of boycotts for political reasons connected to the conflict. Notably the United States refused to participate in the 1980 Moscow Games because of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. A total of 62 countries skipped that year’s Games including Japan and West Germany. Four years later, the Soviet Union boycotted the 1984 Los Angeles Games officially for “security reasons,” though it was widely seen as a retaliatory measure for the 1980 mass boycott.

The 1988 Seoul Games would be the last with a large-scale boycott. North Korea refused to attend the Games in South Korea after they were not named as a co-host. Ethiopia and Cuba also boycotted out of solidarity with North Korea.
 
.
... and what happened when Pakistan happened ?

It took nearly a decade to shed the ' enslaved ' status of the British Head of State !!


People in India still takes pride in the name 'India' coined by the masters, the Britishers...even the country name is borrowed from the former masters, talking about the enslaved mentality.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom