What's new

Pakistan says it needs no financial assistance from US

cocomo

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
1,636
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan says it needs no financial assistance from US
Aamir Saeed | Published — Sunday 31 December 2017

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Foreign Office said on Saturday that the country needs no financial assistance from the US, which it accuses of ignoring Pakistan’s effective operations in the war on terror.
“We do not need any financial assistance from the United States. We do not care about it. If America wants to stop it, we will loudly say go ahead,” Dr. Mohammad Faisal, spokesperson for Pakistan’s Foreign Office, told Arab News in an interview.
“Pakistan receives a paltry amount in terms of Coalition Support Fund from the US, and if the Trump administration withholds it, it will hardly make any difference to a country of 207 million people,” he said.
The Coalition Support Fund is a reimbursement to Pakistan from the US of expenses incurred in operations against militants and compensation for logistical facilities made available to the coalition forces operating in Afghanistan.
As relations between the US and Pakistan have soured in recent months, the Trump administration, according to a New York Times report, is contemplating withholding $255 million in aid to Pakistan as “a show of dissatisfaction with Pakistan’s broader intransigence toward confronting the terrorist networks that operate there.”
“We will insist that Pakistan take decisive action against militant and terrorist groups operating from its soil,” the US said in its National Security Strategy announced by President Donald Trump on Dec. 18.
“The United States continues to face threats from transnational terrorists and militants operating from within Pakistan,” it said. “We will press Pakistan to intensify its counterterrorism efforts, since no partnership can survive a country’s support for militants and terrorists who target a partner’s own service members and officials.”
Dr. Mohammad Faisal, however, vehemently rejects the US allegations, saying that Pakistan’s security forces have undertaken indiscriminate and effective operations against terrorism and extremism in recent years.
“Pakistan is a more stable, peaceful and secure country after these operations,” he said. “We have repeatedly informed the US that no organized structure of any terrorist outfit exists in Pakistan.”
He advised the US to focus on factors responsible for exponential increase in drug production, expansion of ungoverned spaces, breakdown of governance and letting Daesh gain a foothold in Afghanistan instead of pressuring Pakistan to do more.
“We remain committed to protect our sovereignty, territorial integrity and national interest determined by the people of Pakistan,” he said.
Relations between Pakistan and the US soured after President Donald Trump accused the country of providing a “safe haven to agents of chaos, violence, and terror” while launching the US strategy for Afghanistan and South Asia on Aug. 21.
Air Marshal (retd) Shahid Latif told Arab News that the US has been blaming Pakistan for its failure in the war against terror in Afghanistan and is threatening Pakistan with dire consequences — action that is unbecoming of an ally such as the US.
“We will do no more to support the United States in our region,” he said while fully endorsing Pakistan’s attitude toward the US.

“The Trump administration has been threatening Pakistan instead of acknowledging our tremendous sacrifices in the war against terror and this is totally unacceptable to us,” he said.
Ayaz Wazir, a former diplomat, told Arab News that Pakistan is a sovereign country and the Trump administration cannot cow it down through threats of unilateral actions against militants and stopping of financial aid.
“The US has totally failed in restoring law and order in Afghanistan and it wants to make Pakistan a scapegoat by accusing it of harboring militants on its soil,” he said. “Around 22 terrorist outfits including Daesh are still active in Afghanistan despite the presence of the US troops since 2001.”
Wazir said Pakistan has improved its relations significantly in recent years with two veto powers, China and Russia, and it hardly needs any backing of the US in its national and international affairs.
“The Trump administration should cooperate with Pakistan’s armed forces and the civilians to restore peace in Afghanistan and stability in the region instead of hurling threats,” he suggested.

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1216696/world
 
. .
USA drama continues, announce $700m for using our roads, month later take back 1/3 from it in the name of Haqqanis and what not. Why not keep all of it while also look for some other routes?
 
. .
Just rip them off on the trucks that go through Pakistan
or even better if they stop U.S supplies and get out of this
war on terror.
 
.
“We will do no more to support the United States in our region,” he said while fully endorsing Pakistan’s attitude toward the US.

bloody hell, been waiting a lifetime to listen to these golden words.

Before USA used to give $$ and F-16, now just empty threats. Change of attitude from Pakistan was expected.
 
.
“We will do no more to support the United States in our region,” he said while fully endorsing Pakistan’s attitude toward the US.

bloody hell, been waiting a lifetime to listen to these golden words.
Air Marshal (retd) Shahid Latif is not an official of the Gov. or the Army. He is an analyst who appears on TV frequently and this is his analysis of Pakistan's policy going forward. Just wanted to make it clear that isn't the official stance (yet) as far as I know.
351.jpg
 
. .
USA drama continues, announce $700m for using our roads, month later take back 1/3 from it in the name of Haqqanis and what not. Why not keep all of it while also look for some other routes?
They are actively looking for alternative route. Here is a great read.

http://www.atimes.com/article/afghan-war-trump-putin-battle-uzbek-support/
America wants a backup route to ferry troops and supplies to Kabul, in case Pakistan shuts its gateway to Afghanistan; but Russia may be inclined to up the ante and offer Uzbekistan's President Mirziyoyez some competitive diplomacy
 
.
“We will do no more to support the United States in our region,” he said while fully endorsing Pakistan’s attitude toward the US.

bloody hell, been waiting a lifetime to listen to these golden words.
i am listening these word since time immemorial
 
.
Air Marshal (retd) Shahid Latif is not an official of the Gov. or the Army. He is an analyst who appears on TV frequently and this is his analysis of Pakistan's policy going forward. Just wanted to make it clear that isn't the official stance (yet) as far as I know.
351.jpg

fair point.

i am listening these word since time immemorial
indeed true but things are changing for sure.
 
. . .
On previous occasion, Pakistan's interior minister has demanded audit of claimed American aid.
Such a demand from senior minister put doubt on all of American aid, specially when US has failed to provide accounts matching to it's claims!
It seems, US was in some sort of corrupt understanding with Asif Ali Zardari, over the aid claims, it's actual dispensation and its accounts.
If US use Pakistan as transit and pay taxes..... just like a common Pakistani pays tool and taxes... well, that can't be termed aid.
Aid is something like US deliver to India.
 
.
That’s great because we are done with them.
You are britain not "We" , since u have said that so many times on the forum and reinforced that you have nothing to do with pakistan its best you stick with britain identity and leave "We" for rest of us.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom