What's new

PAKISTAN RETURNS THE FAVOUR AGAIN

If we are gonna believe Pakistani claims on Indian casualties, lets be fair and also believe Indian claims on Pakistani casualties...what say.. Pakistanis ?

Islamabad has been made to pay a heavy price, with the Indian Army revealing that it has killed at least 20 Pakistani Rangers and injured seven more in 2018 itself in cross-border firing along the LoC

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...2018-what-must-it-do-next-118021600207_1.html
So in other words, us “admitting” the loss of a minor is essentially what India counts as a kill?

Is your military and nation so immoral as to take the death of a child as the loss of a soldier?
 
.
So in other words, us admitted a loss of a minor is essentially what India counts as a kill?

Is your military and nation so immoral as to take the death of a child as the loss of a soldier?
Indians and morality? They are worst than dogs.
 
.
.
Running and losing is better than bowing head befibe the conquerors...
India were small-small independent states that time... They always quaralled each other... Islamic conquerors took that division as an opportunity... Islam grown through aggression mainly... Means you people didn't choose this life ,but it was forced on you by the conquerors...
Every religions put forward a superior way of life... But only some enlighted one actually get it...
U stupid as.... islam is never forced. ANS ME 1 QUESTION HOW MANY PEOPLES R CONVERTED IN HINDUS. ANY HOW MANY R CONVERTED IN ISLAM. AND WHY. IF U WILL DIG DEEP TO REVEAL THE ANS I AM SHORE U WILL B CONVERTED IN MUSLIM.
 
.
If we are gonna believe Pakistani claims on Indian casualties, lets be fair and also believe Indian claims on Pakistani casualties...what say.. Pakistanis ?

Islamabad has been made to pay a heavy price, with the Indian Army revealing that it has killed at least 20 Pakistani Rangers and injured seven more in 2018 itself in cross-border firing along the LoC

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...2018-what-must-it-do-next-118021600207_1.html

to that we say those 20 lucky ones got what they wished for, for what they joined the army and made their parents pround...mubarak mubarak
 
. .
The two are not equal. Indian soldiers are disgraced war criminals who snipe on children - what a disgrace for the man kind. That's what disgraced war criminals would do in desperation. Pak military destroys the Indian military posts at the LoC. That's what a professional military would do. If Indians can kill 20 Pak soldiers (as these disgraced liars claim), why do they need to target children. Why do they fall such a low? Due to utter desperation, I am sure.
Professional armies also clear civilians from war zones. Even then, collateral damage is expected. Is there any war in the history of mankind without any kind of collateral damage?
 
.
ISPR claims ...Phew....

These guys think that they kill indian soldiers and get away with it. Jernal Bajwa jumps into indian territory and count indian deads and tell Ghafoor to post it own twitter..

and pakistanis goes happy by reading abt bravest act of army. This is how loop goes..

Far better than your claim i.e. Indian army has killed 130 Pak soldiers while Indian army suffered only 20 causalities in 2017 in LOC. Even a kid knows this is highly exaggerated and totally false claim.
 
.
Oyy kabatoor, 21 sikhon ne 10000 pakhtunon ki maar li thi.
The only confirmed fact about Saraghari episode is that all of those 21 servants of British from Sikh community perished on those hills. Did they face 10,000 men or actually just 100 men? one can only speculate in the absence of any records from opposite side. Did those 21 Sikh servants of British raj fight bravely or they shat in their pants? we dont know. Brave and respect-worthy were the ones who went uphill against the odds and finished those 21 servants of Angraiz colonialism.
 
.
So in other words, us “admitting” the loss of a minor is essentially what India counts as a kill?

Is your military and nation so immoral as to take the death of a child as the loss of a soldier?

What on earth are you talking about, where in my post or the article attached, is death of child being considered as death of soldier?

The only confirmed fact about Saraghari episode is that all of those 21 servants of British from Sikh community perished on those hills. Did they face 10,000 men or actually just 100 men? one can only speculate in the absence of any records from opposite side. Did those 21 Sikh servants of British raj fight bravely or they shat in their pants? we dont know. Brave and respect-worthy were the ones who went uphill against the odds and finished those 21 servants of Angraiz colonialism.

Considering there were nearly 600 Pashtun bodies recovered from the battlefield, clearly those 21 soldiers faced more than 100 pashtuns.


I am not a Hindu, Sikh, Muslim or christian to you. I am just an Indian.
 
.
What on earth are you talking about, where in my post or the article attached, is death of child being considered as death of soldier?



Considering there were nearly 600 Pashtun bodies recovered from the battlefield, clearly those 21 soldiers faced more than 100 pashtuns.



I am not a Hindu, Sikh, Muslim or christian to you. I am just an Indian.
So where did Pakistani casualities being celebrated by your kind come into the death of a child?
 
. .
So where did Pakistani casualities being celebrated by your kind come into the death of a child?

You are another victim of selective deletion of posts from the thread..so that subsequent post dont make any sense.

The title of thread was "Pakistan return the favour". In Third post of this thread, ISPR claimed Pakistan has killed 2 Indian soldiers, in return of death of a child. To which I said, if we are to start believing Pakistani claims on Indian casualties, then why not Indian claims on Pakistani casualties. And that is how it started.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom