What's new

Pakistan rekindles the SAARC flame

cocomo

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
1,636
Reaction score
-1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan rekindles the SAARC flame
By M K Bhadrakumar – March 26, 2018

The Indian media largely gave the pass to the visit by Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena to Pakistan last week. They are more into what happens between India and the western world. They lionize western ambassadors based in Delhi but ignore the envoys from the region where India lives, who would be far more consequential to India’s foreign policies.
While Modi government is successively feting the European leaders, Pakistan is purposively focusing on its immediate neighborhood – viciously conspiratorial and jealous and envious, perhaps,but in fact, completely human. Sirisena was the Chief Guest at the ceremony in Islamabad marking Pakistan’s National Day on March 23.
Don’t be surprised if Khadga Prasad Sharma Oli, Nepal’s communist prime minister, is going to be next year’s Chief Guest in Islamabad on March 23. Indeed, a return visit by Oli will be due by then, following the recent visit by Pakistani Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi to Kathmandu. By the way, Abbasi bonded well with Oli. He was the first South Asian statesman whom Oli received in Kathmandu after forming the new government.
The media reports from Colombo and Islamabad have highlighted that Sirisena gave thumbs up to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Didn’t he know about the Modi government’s trenchant opposition to the CPEC on the ground that it passes through ‘Indian territory’? Of course, Sirisena knew that ‘territorial sovereignty’ rankles the Indian mind. But that didn’t deter him from expressing pleasure that Pakistan is making wonderful progress because of the CPEC.
The Sri Lankan diplomacy works very astutely in soft undertones but with razor-sharp precision and cutting edge. Here, PM Modi has personally put on the mantle of leadership of the Buddhist world and is (re)claiming Buddhism as India’s heritage. But Sirisena took with him to Pakistan the Buddhist clergy from Sri Lanka, and in the presence of several representatives from Buddhist countries, he solemnized the re-opening of the International Buddhist Centre in the Diplomatic Enclave in Islamabad following religious observances.
Sirisena also vowed to work with Pakistan for regional peace and development. Again, he treaded dangerously close to Kashmir and India-Pakistan tensions. Indeed, Kashmir had figured in the discussions of Pakistan Foreign Secretary Tehmina Janjua in Colombo last October. (Sirisena had received Janjua.)
However, the common thread running through Abbasi’s visit to Kathmandu and the state visit by Sirisena to Islamabad is something else. It lies in the unmistakable signs that Pakistani diplomacy is shifting gear to breathe new life into the moribund South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).
Both Oli and Sirisena have voiced support for the convening the SAARC summit without further delay. The summit was due to be held at the end of 2014 but the Modi government scotched the plan by refusing to participate on the ground that Pakistan was indulging in cross-border terrorism against India. It was a patently lame excuse because India never used SAARC as hostage – not even in trying times such as the terrorist attack on the Indian parliament (December 2001) or the Mumbai attacks (November 2008).
Arguably, Modi government wanted to display in front of the core constituency at home a new ‘muscularity’ toward Pakistan. Or, perhaps, it wanted to cover up the profound contradiction that it simply lacked a coherent policy toward Pakistan. At any rate, the astonishing thing is that PM Modi wouldn’t attend the proposed 19th SAARC summit in Islamabad in November 2014 but would suddenly present himself at the tarmac of the Allama Iqbal International Airport at Lahore just about an year later on December 25, 2015 to be received by Nawaz Sharif with a warm hug.
To be sure, when it comes to SAARC, Delhi appears petulant. Thus, today, we are in a funny situation by having fun and frolic with the ASEAN while on the other hand strangulating the SAARC. It is an absurd position, which is going be increasingly untenable. A groundswell of opinion is building in the region supporting the idea of Pakistan hosting the SAARC summit.
Of course, the spectre that haunts the Modi government could also be China’s membership of the SAARC. India is the lone ranger today opposing China’s entry into SAARC. However, with China welcoming India into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a full member, it is problematic for Delhi to keep stalling.
India has dominated the SAARC so far. But then, the region no longer accepts Indian hegemony. And China’s entry into SAARC, when it happens, may change the entire alchemy of regional cooperation in South Asia.
Therefore, in tune with the spirit of our times, we should learn the craft to use SAARC (or SCO) as a regional platform to improve India’s problematic relationships with Pakistan and China. Diplomacy is all about engagement and to shy away from engagement betrays a cowardly mindset.

http://blogs.rediff.com/mkbhadrakumar/2018/03/26/pakistan-rekindles-the-saarc-flame/
 
.
India dominates SAARC.
The last two years aptly demonstrated that without Indian permission not even a tiny meeting of the organization can be held.
On top of that, while Sri Lanka President visited Pakistan once he visited India 4 times.
Nepals new PM has choosen India to be the destination for his first foreign trip since taking office as he will visit India next month on 25th.
 
Last edited:
. . .
India dominates SAARC.
The last two years aptly demonstrated that without Indian permission not even a tiny meeting of the organization can be held.

You need to read up on the SAARC charter.. The summit cannot be held even if one of it's full members are unavailable

So if Maldives refuse to attend it next time it might be held in Delhi.. India will face the same predicament
 
.
You need to read up on the SAARC charter.. The summit cannot be held even if one of it's full members are unavailable

So if Maldives refuse to attend it next time it might be held in Delhi.. India will face the same predicament
I am not taking about summit.
Even secondary meetings like Foreign ministers or home Ministers meets have not been held since India pulled support
 
. . .
The clause include those as well, Unless they are multi lateral outside the organization, Like the BIMSTEC
Not really.
Last time during 2009 meet Bangladesh pulled out but the meeting went on.
 
.
If 1 SAARC member refuses to attend, the summit is cancelled. So bite your hubris and sing Jai Shri Ram

India dominates SAARC.
The last two years aptly demonstrated that without Indian permission not even a tiny meeting of the organization can be held.
On top of that, while Sri Lanka President visited Pakistan once he visited India 4 times.
Nepals new PM has choosen India to be the destination for his first foreign trip since taking office as he will visit India next month on 25th.
 
.
India dominates SAARC.
The last two years aptly demonstrated that without Indian permission not even a tiny meeting of the organization can be held.
On top of that, while Sri Lanka President visited Pakistan once he visited India 4 times.
Nepals new PM has choosen India to be the destination for his first foreign trip since taking office as he will visit India next month on 25th.

because it would sound stupid to visit Pakistan right after Oli hosted Pakistan PM as a first foreign dignitary, not the Indian PM....So, what it the 2nd most important country in South Asia...obviously India
 
.
SAARC as it stands is a useless organization. Successful regional organizations can only exist where there exists some level of parity between the parties involved, especially in the context of Asia where irredentism and countries trying to expand their borders at the cost of neighbors is a very real thing. ASEAN or the EU are successful because a number of different countries of all sizes exist within them. In SAARC only Pakistan can balance things somewhat, although being seven times smaller than India it is still a long shot. Till a country of China's size is added, SAARC will just be a bullying ground for India.
 
.
SAARC as it stands is a useless organization. Successful regional organizations can only exist where there exists some level of parity between the parties involved, especially in the context of Asia where irredentism and countries trying to expand their borders at the cost of neighbors is a very real thing. ASEAN or the EU are successful because a number of different countries of all sizes exist within them. In SAARC only Pakistan can balance things somewhat, although being seven times smaller than India it is still a long shot. Till a country of China's size is added, SAARC will just be a bullying ground for India.

SAARC is mostly an economic grouping as such even Pakistan doesn't stand a chance. Over 80% of trade in south asia is with India. Rest of the countries becomes irrelevant when they are seen individually including Pakistan. I would guess Bangladesh is more relevant to the grouping given its trade with other south asian countries is better than Pakistan.
 
.
because it would sound stupid to visit Pakistan right after Oli hosted Pakistan PM as a first foreign dignitary, not the Indian PM....So, what it the 2nd most important country in South Asia...obviously India
Indian PM will never visit before Nepal PM visit cause as per Hindu culture little brother visits house of big brother first.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom