Pakistan ranks among top 10 improving regulation economies globally: Report

[SQ8]

The thread title says Pakistan. Any Indian seen dragging in their own country for self fellatio will be warned under derailment.

 

[Baba Google]

aik acre ka theka satar hazaar say gir kar bees bees hazaar per aa gaya hai, karzay utar nai rahay. aur economy improve ho rahi? Kamaal hai sir g.

 

[DJ_Viper]

The first link is from 2003.

Sir, That's the only thing you've come up with? The other link was a recent one. I was expecting somewhat of a better response. But I found two more links on one google search. I think you have access to google as well. All this stuff is public information so feel free to research yourself.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...growth-surging-to-7-as-china-invests-billions

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-decade-high-growth-as-imf-program-nears-end

 

[salarsikander]

And yet state bank is issuing coins for 10 rupee note

 

[swnjo]

Sir, That's the only thing you've come up with? The other link was a recent one. I was expecting somewhat of a better response. But I found two more links on one google search. I think you have access to google as well. All this stuff is public information so feel free to research yourself.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...growth-surging-to-7-as-china-invests-billions

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-decade-high-growth-as-imf-program-nears-end

The title of the thread has now changed, previous title was misleading.

 

[DJ_Viper]

The title of the thread has now changed, previous title was misleading.

The thread title doesn't matter. He was responding to my post. Not to thread's title. Why do I see utter B.S. on this thread by a few members sir?

 

[swnjo]

The thread title doesn't matter. He was responding to my post. Not to thread's title. Why do I see utter B.S. on this thread by a few members sir?

Because the initial thread title was a bs. You want a fair discussion, start with a honest title, won`t attract unwanted comments.

 

[DJ_Viper]

Because the initial thread title was a bs. You want a fair discussion, start with a honest title, won`t attract unwanted comments.

Useless conversation. You asked for resources, I provided those. You then didn't care to read the 2016 one but rejected both by saying "one of these is from 2003" (totally ignoring the 2016 one). I then gave you more links from 2016 and then you went towards "the thread's topic was changed".

How about we go back to the post and debate you and I were having: did you read the sources I gave you from 2016?? Don't "wing it", just answer to what I provided you.