What's new

Pakistan offensive disrupting militant attacks, U.S. says

daring dude

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jul 22, 2013
Messages
836
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
16x9

Pakistani civilians who were displaced by the anti-insurgent operation in North Waziristan offer Eid al-Fitr prayers at the end of the fasting month of Ramadan in Bannu on July 28. (Karim Ullah / AFP/Getty Images)


Six-week Pakistani army offensive has succeeded in disrupting the militant groups that have long enjoyed free rein in the rugged North Waziristan tribal region along the border with Afghanistan, Obama administration officials say.

But proof of the operation's success, they say, will be whether groups such as the notorious Haqqani network are allowed to reconstitute themselves in North Waziristan or elsewhere and again plot attacks against U.S.-led forces in neighboring Afghanistan or elsewhere.
Previous Pakistani offensives in the tribal belt have either ignored groups like the Haqqanis — who are blamed for deadly attacks against U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan — or allowed them to return. U.S. military officials believe that top levels of Pakistan's security establishment back the Haqqanis as a proxy force to maintain influence in Afghanistan.

But with most U.S. forces withdrawing from Afghanistan at the end of the year, the U.S. military's ability to battle the Haqqani network is expected to diminish sharply. Obama administration officials have pressed Pakistan's military leaders in a series of meetings this month to ensure the group does not escape the current operation.

"We keep telling them they must go after all the terrorists and that they cannot cherry-pick," said a senior U.S. official who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks. "We've been quite emphatic about that."

Pakistan insists that no insurgent groups will be spared in the offensive, which began in mid-June and has resulted in the deaths of more than 500 militants and the seizure of large weapons caches and bomb-making factories, according to unconfirmed Pakistani army reports.

But some officials say that insurgents fled the area before the start of the offensive, which had been rumored for several months.

U.S. officials have not received photographs or other visual evidence from Pakistan showing it has directly targeted the Haqqani network. In the end, the senior U.S. official said, "We end up having a good conversation but the bottom line is we have to be convinced there is no reconstituting of terrorist facilities and safe havens."


Some analysts believe that Pakistan is taking action now because of a provision in the 2015 Pentagon budget that could withhold hundreds of millions of dollars in counter-terrorism funding unless Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel certifies that Pakistan has "significantly disrupted the safe haven and freedom of movement of the Haqqani network."

Now that they have begun such an operation, "the Pakistanis are making an argument in Washington that they should be given continued coalition support," C. Christine Fair, author of "Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army's Way of War," told the Times of India in an interview this week. Pakistan has received $28 billion in U.S. military and economic aid since 2002, and additional expenditures would be "outrageous," she said.

Pakistan has not given a timetable for the offensive, which began with airstrikes and has proceeded to ground operations in Miram Shah and Mir Ali, the largest towns in North Waziristan, which are now mostly controlled by the military.

Pakistani officials declined to comment specifically on the Haqqani network, which analysts regard as one of the most experienced insurgent groups fighting in Afghanistan. The group, led by Sirajuddin Haqqani, is under the umbrella of the Afghan Taliban but is seen as being more closely linked to Al Qaeda's central leadership.

U.S. military leaders have long believed that Pakistan did not target the Haqqani network before because it does not carry out attacks in Pakistan. Afghan authorities also accuse Pakistan of sparing the Haqqani network in the current offensive, arguing that no senior commander in the group has been reported killed.



Last week, a spokesman for the Afghan intelligence service, the National Directorate of Security, alleged that Pakistan's security establishment had shifted Haqqani fighters to safe places before the operation began, prompting swift denials from Pakistani officials.

At a news conference the next day, Pakistan Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry said Afghanistan, whose army is struggling to contain a domestic Taliban insurgency, should take action against militants fleeing over the border from Pakistan.

"It is … our expectation that action would be taken on the Afghan side to check the fleeing terrorists and not to allow Afghan territory to be used by anti-Pakistan elements," Chaudhry said.

Tribal leaders who spoke on condition of anonymity because they feared reprisals from the militants have said the Haqqanis and other groups fled North Waziristan in the days before the operation began. With less than one-third of the tribal region reportedly under government control, many fighters are believed to have taken refuge in other areas of North Waziristan, including Datta Khel, the site of recent U.S. drone strikes, and in the thickly forested Shawal valley.

Rahimullah Yusufzai, a Pakistani journalist who closely follows militant groups, said the currentoperation has displaced the Haqqani network but the insurgents, who typically operate in groups of about 20, would eventually be able to regroup and plot attacks in Afghanistan from elsewhere in the area.

"It would take some time for them to establish their training and communication facilities at some other place," he said, and targeting Afghan border provinces such as Khowst and Paktika soon "would not be a problem for them."

Pakistan offensive disrupting militant attacks, U.S. says - LA Times
A six-week Pakistani army offensive has succeeded in disrupting the militant groups that have long enjoyed free rein in the rugged North Waziristan tribal region along the border with Afghanistan, Obama administration officials say.
But proof of the operation's success, they say, will be whether groups such as the notorious Haqqani network are allowed to reconstitute themselves in North Waziristan or elsewhere and again plot attacks against U.S.-led forces in neighboring Afghanistan or elsewhere.

We keep telling them they must go after all the terrorists and that they cannot cherry-pick.- A senior U.S. official
Previous Pakistani offensives in the tribal belt have either ignored groups like the Haqqanis — who are blamed for deadly attacks against U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan — or allowed them to return. U.S. military officials believe that top levels of Pakistan's security establishment back the Haqqanis as a proxy force to maintain influence in Afghanistan.
But with most U.S. forces withdrawing from Afghanistan at the end of the year, the U.S. military's ability to battle the Haqqani network is expected to diminish sharply. Obama administration officials have pressed Pakistan's military leaders in a series of meetings this month to ensure the group does not escape the current operation.
"We keep telling them they must go after all the terrorists and that they cannot cherry-pick," said a senior U.S. official who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks. "We've been quite emphatic about that."
A six-week Pakistani army offensive has succeeded in disrupting the militant groups that have long enjoyed free rein in the rugged North Waziristan tribal region along the border with Afghanistan, Obama administration officials say.
But proof of the operation's success, they say, will be whether groups such as the notorious Haqqani network are allowed to reconstitute themselves in North Waziristan or elsewhere and again plot attacks against U.S.-led forces in neighboring Afghanistan or elsewhere.

We keep telling them they must go after all the terrorists and that they cannot cherry-pick.- A senior U.S. official
Previous Pakistani offensives in the tribal belt have either ignored groups like the Haqqanis — who are blamed for deadly attacks against U.S.-led forces in Afghanistan — or allowed them to return. U.S. military officials believe that top levels of Pakistan's security establishment back the Haqqanis as a proxy force to maintain influence in Afghanistan.
But with most U.S. forces withdrawing from Afghanistan at the end of the year, the U.S. military's ability to battle the Haqqani network is expected to diminish sharply. Obama administration officials have pressed Pakistan's military leaders in a series of meetings this month to ensure the group does not escape the current operation.
"We keep telling them they must go after all the terrorists and that they cannot cherry-pick," said a senior U.S. official who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks. "We've been quite emphatic about that."
 
. .
Thank god they didn't say DO MORE this time
 
.
Never win against the mujahideen inshallah you mongs
yeah right ... TTP are khawariji's
they killed more than 40000 innocent civilians .. they play football with civilian head .. They do force marraiges with girls of respectable famiilies

And Pakistan army is treating them in every angle as they want

Taliban should overrun the capital to teach Pak army a lesson in helping Americans
5000 multinational Scums cannot overrun 640000 strong army ....
 
Last edited:
. .
Lot of manure peddled in the article. You want to read truth ?

A senior Pakistani official insisted Thursday that Pakistan wants the Haqqani network destroyed, but that to a certain degree it’s in the hands of Afghanistan, NATO and the United States.

“I’m a little amused by these remarks,” the official said, speaking with a small group of reporters under condition of anonymity. “For anyone who knows the terrain, 50,000 on an average cross each day 2,600 kilometers of border, unmanned and unmonitored. Here I see with all your technology and resources that you have not been able to secure your border,” the official said, referring to the current influx of undocumented and unaccompanied minors.

“No. 2, for weeks and months it was being debated in Pakistan publicly that if the dialogue process fails the government will go into military operations,” the official continued. “The Haqqani or others were prepared to flee the country. Third, when they were fleeing, what was the the leadership of the U.S. and NATO and ISAF [International Security Assistance Force] doing? Did we tell them not to take these people out? In fact, sir, we requested the Americans to help us take them out when they were fleeing and if they were fleeing.”

The official said that Pakistan warned U.S. officials early on, as they were preparing military options, that some militants might flee.

“You have the technology, you have the means, you are sitting across the border, please take them out,” the official said. “Please eliminate them. you’d be doing us and yourselves a great good. Please do not permit these people to disappear. Take them out, eliminate them, capture them. We use the terminology used by many people in the past: There should be a hammer and anvil. the Pakistan hammer saw no evidence of the anvil on the other side.”

It makes no sense, the official said, for Pakistan to risk so many lives and spend so much money just to “let them escape,” and that “militants, whatever hue and color they may be, are a threat to Pakistan.”

Did Pakistan Let Haqqani Network Slip Away on Purpose?
 
.
Lot of manure peddled in the article. You want to read truth ?

The truth is somewhere in the middle. USA can clearly do more on within its area of control, and Pakistan is making the calculation that pushing over the Haqqanis over there just before the Murrikans leave will help it influence the post-departure scenario and allow its assets to come out of this whole sage relatively unscathed. The mess is only just beginning.
 
.
i think #USA should have to correct him self or it's route, coz 1 side it is helping and Supporting #Al qaeda ,#ISIS and other so Called Liberal Mercenaries in Syria, Yemen, Libya, Tunis, Somalia, Iraq, Saudi ...
 
. .
Our decade long alliance is built on our shared values and principles. Our nations have a common stance against terrorism and refuse to bow down to those who pose a threat to the safety of our nations. The doubters and conspiracy theorists have always spoken against the relationship of the U.S. and Pakistan, but we realize the importance of staying united against our common enemies. It is also important to keep in mind that the U.S. and Pakistan are two independent partner nations, and our officials from the highest level are meeting regularly to address our shared concerns, as evident by the visit from U.S. special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, James Dobbins, couple of weeks ago. We certainly look forward to meeting regularly, and hope to work together in healthy partnership for the sake of achieving our shared peace objectives in the region.

Ali Khan
Digital Engagement Team, USCENTCOM
 
.
Talk is cheap and worthless.

When is the ANA and ISAF going to destroy terrorist bases in Kunar and Nuristan?!
 
.
@CENTCOM i really respect and appreciate your response, but y then #US or #Nato #Drones not hitting #TTP targets whether in Pak's #Fata or Afg's Kunar or Nooristan Province.. and only hitting the #Haqani network... then also let me know who started this proxy , 4th or 5th generation warfare?
as both of the US and Pak are evident of the fact that India's #R&AW is behind #TTP and Uzbeks.
 
.
Pakistan Army has cleared two major towns that were a major staging areas for the Terrorist attacks of the TTP.

We need to uproot the TTP from FATA area.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom