What's new

Pakistan moves US court to stop over $6bn fine in Reko Diq case

Murgah

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 23, 2017
Messages
615
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
https://www.dawn.com/news/1527356/pakistan-moves-us-court-to-stop-over-6bn-fine-in-reko-diq-case
WASHINGTON: Pakistan has asked a US federal court to pause an Australian copper company’s bid to enforce a $6 billion arbitral award while it looks to have the award nixed, reports Law360, a New York-based legal publication.

The company — Tethyan Copper Co. Pty Ltd — won the award last summer following a dispute over the rejected Reko Diq mining project in Balochistan.

Pakistan argued in a federal court in Washington that the enforcement could have “devastating consequences for its political and economic stability”, said the author, Caroline Simson.

In a brief submitted in the court on Friday, Pakistan argued that Tethyan “shouldn’t be allowed to proceed with the litigation while it looks to annul the award based on “numerous substantive and procedural errors”.

ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD
Australian firm won the award last summer following dispute over the Balochistan mining project

The report noted that the award is the second largest ever to be issued by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and equals 2 per cent of Pakistan’s annual gross domestic product and 40 per cent of its total liquid foreign reserves.

ICSID is an international arbitration institution established in 1966 for legal dispute resolution and conciliation between international investors and is part of and funded by the World Bank Group, headquartered in Washington.

Pakistan said in the brief that its economy was already facing “significant challenges and weaknesses” and that enforcing the award would effectively negate a $6 billion loan it received from the International Monetary Fund last year to stabilise its government and economy.

Pakistan also pointed out that ICSID’s secretary general provisionally stayed enforcement of the award after registering the annulment bid in November, adding that the benefits of pausing the litigation are “overwhelming”.

“[A] stay not only avoids the possibility of conflicting results between this court’s determination of enforcement and the ICSID’s determination to annul the award [...] but it also eliminates the time and expense associated with an appeal and any subsequent litigation,” Pakistan argued.

The brief claimed that the tribunal wrongly disregarded international law limiting the amount of damages available for lost profits and that it relied on a novel damages calculation method “without authorisation or explanation” that resulted in a number billions of dollars higher than a traditional model would, Law360 reported.

Pakistan argued that the “discounted cash flow approach”, used for awarding Tethyan, failed to properly account for certain risks and uncertainties in the project.

Also, the calculated damages were based on a projected 56-year operating period for the mine even though no lease or permits for the project were ever issued by Pakistani authorities, the brief added.

Pakistan informed ICSID that the proposed project was based on agreements that were invalid under Pakistani law and, therefore, Tethyan Copper couldn’t seek any damages.

Attorneys for the parties could not immediately be reached for comment on Monday.

The Chilean copper miner Antofagasta plc won the award last July in arbitration that arose out of Pakistan’s 2011 denial of a mining lease for the Reko Diq project.

Published in Dawn, January 10th, 2020
 
. .
https://www.dawn.com/news/1527356/pakistan-moves-us-court-to-stop-over-6bn-fine-in-reko-diq-case
WASHINGTON: Pakistan has asked a US federal court to pause an Australian copper company’s bid to enforce a $6 billion arbitral award while it looks to have the award nixed, reports Law360, a New York-based legal publication.

The company — Tethyan Copper Co. Pty Ltd — won the award last summer following a dispute over the rejected Reko Diq mining project in Balochistan.

Pakistan argued in a federal court in Washington that the enforcement could have “devastating consequences for its political and economic stability”, said the author, Caroline Simson.

In a brief submitted in the court on Friday, Pakistan argued that Tethyan “shouldn’t be allowed to proceed with the litigation while it looks to annul the award based on “numerous substantive and procedural errors”.

ARTICLE CONTINUES AFTER AD
Australian firm won the award last summer following dispute over the Balochistan mining project

The report noted that the award is the second largest ever to be issued by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and equals 2 per cent of Pakistan’s annual gross domestic product and 40 per cent of its total liquid foreign reserves.

ICSID is an international arbitration institution established in 1966 for legal dispute resolution and conciliation between international investors and is part of and funded by the World Bank Group, headquartered in Washington.

Pakistan said in the brief that its economy was already facing “significant challenges and weaknesses” and that enforcing the award would effectively negate a $6 billion loan it received from the International Monetary Fund last year to stabilise its government and economy.

Pakistan also pointed out that ICSID’s secretary general provisionally stayed enforcement of the award after registering the annulment bid in November, adding that the benefits of pausing the litigation are “overwhelming”.

“[A] stay not only avoids the possibility of conflicting results between this court’s determination of enforcement and the ICSID’s determination to annul the award [...] but it also eliminates the time and expense associated with an appeal and any subsequent litigation,” Pakistan argued.

The brief claimed that the tribunal wrongly disregarded international law limiting the amount of damages available for lost profits and that it relied on a novel damages calculation method “without authorisation or explanation” that resulted in a number billions of dollars higher than a traditional model would, Law360 reported.

Pakistan argued that the “discounted cash flow approach”, used for awarding Tethyan, failed to properly account for certain risks and uncertainties in the project.

Also, the calculated damages were based on a projected 56-year operating period for the mine even though no lease or permits for the project were ever issued by Pakistani authorities, the brief added.

Pakistan informed ICSID that the proposed project was based on agreements that were invalid under Pakistani law and, therefore, Tethyan Copper couldn’t seek any damages.

Attorneys for the parties could not immediately be reached for comment on Monday.

The Chilean copper miner Antofagasta plc won the award last July in arbitration that arose out of Pakistan’s 2011 denial of a mining lease for the Reko Diq project.

Published in Dawn, January 10th, 2020

want arbitration ? it is better .
 
. . .
iftikhar chowdhry created this problem .

Based on what I’ve just read, it seems like the mining company was first awarded the contract and then reneged by the provincial government. Upon this, the company filed a litigation against the government in both Pakistan and international courts. While the Pakistani court sided with the provincial government, the international courts did not.

https://theasiadialogue.com/2019/10...he-cost-of-the-reko-diq-balochistan-disaster/
 
.
This was a mess created by Balochistan government and they should be held responsible.
 
.
Tell this guy to pay or contest the case and make sure win.
CJ_in_Court_%28cropped%29.jpg
 
.
The gifts and surprises of previous regimes still dragging on.

No. Judiciary is responsible. They think PPRA rules are divine rules when it comes to contracts. They lack understanding of international contracts terms and conditions.

TCC moves US court for enforcement of $6bn award in Reko Diq case
By Hasnaat Malik
Published: August 15, 2019
TWEET EMAIL
Reko Diq, Balochistan. PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD.: Tethyan Copper Company (TCC) has approached a court in the United States for enforcement of US$6 billion penalty imposed on Pakistan by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in Reko Diq goldmines case.

According to the Global Arbitration Review (GAR), the TCC – a joint venture of Chile’s Antofagasta and Canada’s Barrick Gold – on August 9 filed a petition at a court for district Columbia after it won the award against Pakistan last month.

An ICSID tribunal – chaired by Germany’s Klaus Sachs and including Bulgarian arbitrator Stanimir Alexandrov and the UK’s Lord Hoffmann – on July 12 ordered Pakistan to pay just over US$4 billion in damages to the TCC, plus US$1.7 billion in pre-award interest.

The tribunal found that Pakistan unlawfully denied the TCC a lease to mine copper and gold deposits at the Reko Diq mine, located in Chagai district of Balochistan. It held the state had committed an unlawful expropriation under the Australia-Pakistan bilateral investment treaty.

The ICSID also declared that the Supreme Court of Pakistan’s 2012 judgment in the rental power projects (RPPs) case was ‘arbitrary’. According to the GAR report, the 622-page final award and earlier decisions in the case are now made public after being filed as exhibits in the US court.

PM orders inquiry into Reko Diq ‘fiasco’

The TCC entered into an agreement with Balochistan in 2006 to develop Reko Diq, on the basis of what it said were assurances from the federal and provincial governments, only to be later ousted from the project in 2012 after the Supreme Court of Pakistan declared the agreement void.

Later, the TCC approached the ICSID case which held a combined 32 hearings of the case in London, Hong Kong and Paris in the subsequent seven years. Pakistan made repeated efforts to have the TCC’s claims thrown out on the grounds that the investment was tainted by corruption.

The state alleged that Tethyan and its predecessor BHP had paid numerous bribes in relation to the project. It also offered an expert opinion by US arbitrator and former president of the International Court of Justice Stephen M Schwebel in relation to its arguments on the TCC’s ‘unclean hands’.

Among its allegations, Pakistan said public officials had been provided with all-expenses-paid trips to Canada and Chile with unnecessary stopovers in Rio de Janeiro, New York, London and Nice. It said the TCC had considered bribing an official with the offer of a house in Islamabad and a BMW car.

The GAR report stated that the TCC denied the corruption allegations, which, it said, were a cynical attempt by the government of Pakistan to rescue its hopeless position in the arbitration.

Reko Diq case handled poorly: Bhootani

In a 2017 decision, the tribunal concluded that Pakistan had not established any of its individual allegations of corruption that would be attributable to the TCC and that could have become relevant as potential contributory fault with regard to quantum.

The GAR report further said the TCC is using Gibson Dunn & Crutcher for the enforcement action, having used Debevoise & Plimpton in the arbitration. Miami and DC-based disputes boutique, the GST will defend Pakistan in the enforcement action. The firm also acted in the later stages of the ICSID case, the state having originally retained Omnia Strategy and Allen & Overy.

In its enforcement application, the TCC says the award shows Pakistan’s denial of the Reko Diq lease was based on “pre-textual grounds with the motive of implementing its own mining project” and taking the value of Tethyan’s investment for itself.

The TCC’s proposed order seeks entry of judgment for US$4.09 billion, plus interest understood to be at least US$1.7 billion and US$62 million in costs. The TCC award is thought to be the second largest in ICSID’s history, beaten only by the US$8.7 billion awarded to US oil company ConocoPhillips in its claim against Venezuela over the expropriation of assets in the Orinoco Belt.

A senior official confirmed that TCC has filed for enforcement.

Pakistan slapped with $6 billion penalty in Reko Diq case

However, he told The Express Tribune that filing for enforcement does not mean anything as it will take several months before Pakistan even receive service of process. “The case will not start till we have been served a notice of process. Generally, it takes about 10 to 12 months,” he added.

An official in the law ministry also revealed that Pakistan is also approaching the international tribunal for annulment of the award. According to international law expert Taimur Malik, Reko Diq award amount is unusual and disproportionate considering the actual investment made by the claimants.

However, the legal battle is not over as yet because Pakistan can still seek annulment of the award and, regardless of the outcome, the annulment hearings can take more than a year.

“Moreover, the claimants will find it very difficult to enforce the award as Pakistan has limited assets abroad and enforcement through Pakistani courts will be time consuming. Therefore, a negotiated settlement is still probably the most likely scenario in this case,” he added.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/203412...gDHki7sa7lD7uACYzuitfxxdS4FRLB5RXxw8prDtcKfOr
 
.
Tell this guy to pay or contest the case and make sure win.
CJ_in_Court_%28cropped%29.jpg
rhis mofo also messed up steel mill now we r back to sshit in last 15 years lost 10+ billion usd amd now ready to give it for free while that time was peak steel price and investers we’re ready with cash in hand
he was a sleeper of enemy
 
.
After matters with Iran have worsened, America is in need of greater cooperation from Pakistan. But its a transactional relationship, if they give you a favour, they expect 3 back.
 
.
iftikhar chowdhry created this problem .

Yes. There was a time when everyone was in love with Iftikhar Chaudhry but people got to know his true colour after he was gone. He was the curse on Pak judicial system.
 
. .
Pakistan should award the contract to Chinese - Pakistani firm and end this none sense
  • Make sale of 7-9 billion Dollar

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send the Other company (Trouble makers) a bill of 5 billion dollars as follow
  • Failure to obtain local license and clearances (fine 1 Billion Dollar)
  • Failure to give Pakistan, a steady supply of Minerals (fine 2 billion Dollar)
  • Failure to employ Pakistani Engineers at 80% capacity ( fine 2 billion Dollar)
  • Failure to follow , environmental policies of Pakistan (fine 1 billion Dollar)
Void their contract, Set appear Jurisdiction inside Islamabad


Alternatively offer the other company 50 million Dollar in damages, in order to resume work with a re-negotiated contract, if agreed setup 10 panel team to renegotiate contract
 
Last edited:
.
With the exception of coal (local energy needs), we should leave all these minerals in the Earth. Knowing the corrupt nature of our elite and their followers, we'll hear stories in 10 years about how 97% of Pakistan's mineral wealth is overseas. Hell, without even digging an ounce, we're in a possible $6-7 billion deficit.

This is why I stand by my belief that had Pakistan been given oil wealth like the Saudis or Iraqis, we'd look a lot like Nigeria or Venezuela. We have real predatory scum over us, truly.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom