PakShaheen79
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2007
- Messages
- 2,548
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
Whatever MK said in his very first post clearly contains some very exaggerated ideas about Indian ability to take down Pakistani BMs thus allowing Indians with decisive conventional victory but in my opinion despite all the exaggeration and omitting China factor completely in Indo, Pak, and US scenario, there are some valid points there which Pakistan's strategic decision makers must take into consideration. For example, the diplomatic implications of developing tactical nuclear weapons and relying on them for defense against CONVENTIONAL Indian forces. If we look at international media and diplomatic circles objectively, already every second think tank is painting Pakistan as an eager party to go nuclear in case a war with India. This is why now the debate about a possible Indo-Pak war has been transformed into a debate about a nuclear war between these two arch rival. This debate is a music to Indian ears and it is allowing them to pose more powerful than they actually are in conventional terms.
I think the remedy is to start developing new conventional capability and using nuclear (both strategic and tactical) weapons as political weapons to keep Indian design in check. The real dilemma is even if we survive after using tactical nuclear weapons, that Pakistan would be far worse than what it is now. This is the point no one is paying heed to. Come what May, Pakistan will have to enhance it's conventional capabilities to an extent that it can keep Indians at bay. In quantity vs quality graph, our eyes must be on quality but if (due to any reason) that is not possible, the best choice is to push for quantity axis with whatever we have and I am happy that now we are seeing that thought process kicking in armed forces and am more happy to see they are putting investment in right place i.e. air force. The only force which will be present over battlefield both on land and sea supporting sister forces both in offensive and defensive roles. Air power is the key for Pakistan. Commissioning of new air force base at Bolari and rising of the new squadron of JF-17s can be one indication that we are pushing quantity axis (China did same in 60s, 70s, 80s, when their scientific organizations were not matured enough to undertake complex projects from scratch and look where they are now). But what next? This push in quantity axis must buy us some time to build our forces in modern terms but for that, we need massive indigenization drive, very solid educational base, massive industrialization with help of overseas Pakistanis etc. But this is way difficult to achieve than saying because of our 2nd dilemma.
Our 2nd dilemma is poor and disastrous foreign policy. Pakistan will have to make its flank dependent on itself. Any blast happening inside Pakistan must send shivers down in spines of Indian and Afghan rulers. How will that happen? when their economic linkages, trade, communication and a lot more will depend on Pakistan. First, Chahbahar and now Oman are the outcomes of our poor play at the diplomatic chessboard. Now you see, both Iran and Oman have become important for India. I can understand that this is very difficult to swallow for our establishment but this is only play left if want to give yourself time to get established as China did and then start building military muscle without getting any transactional relationship with any other country, unlike MK, has described in his very first post.
I think the remedy is to start developing new conventional capability and using nuclear (both strategic and tactical) weapons as political weapons to keep Indian design in check. The real dilemma is even if we survive after using tactical nuclear weapons, that Pakistan would be far worse than what it is now. This is the point no one is paying heed to. Come what May, Pakistan will have to enhance it's conventional capabilities to an extent that it can keep Indians at bay. In quantity vs quality graph, our eyes must be on quality but if (due to any reason) that is not possible, the best choice is to push for quantity axis with whatever we have and I am happy that now we are seeing that thought process kicking in armed forces and am more happy to see they are putting investment in right place i.e. air force. The only force which will be present over battlefield both on land and sea supporting sister forces both in offensive and defensive roles. Air power is the key for Pakistan. Commissioning of new air force base at Bolari and rising of the new squadron of JF-17s can be one indication that we are pushing quantity axis (China did same in 60s, 70s, 80s, when their scientific organizations were not matured enough to undertake complex projects from scratch and look where they are now). But what next? This push in quantity axis must buy us some time to build our forces in modern terms but for that, we need massive indigenization drive, very solid educational base, massive industrialization with help of overseas Pakistanis etc. But this is way difficult to achieve than saying because of our 2nd dilemma.
Our 2nd dilemma is poor and disastrous foreign policy. Pakistan will have to make its flank dependent on itself. Any blast happening inside Pakistan must send shivers down in spines of Indian and Afghan rulers. How will that happen? when their economic linkages, trade, communication and a lot more will depend on Pakistan. First, Chahbahar and now Oman are the outcomes of our poor play at the diplomatic chessboard. Now you see, both Iran and Oman have become important for India. I can understand that this is very difficult to swallow for our establishment but this is only play left if want to give yourself time to get established as China did and then start building military muscle without getting any transactional relationship with any other country, unlike MK, has described in his very first post.
Last edited: