Pakistan finally puts Hafiz Saeed on its terror list

[HinduFacist]

The opening sentence where u say Hindutva is like Islamism is correct in religious sense. For that matter Islamism is also like Buddhism. So nothing wrong in Hindutva, Islamism or Budhism but I know what you are trying to imply. And in that respect , no Hindutva is not like Islamic or Jehadi Terrorism. This is an old trick where people like you try to equate RSS with Nazi Party, Modi with Hitler and Hindutva with Islamic Terrorism.

Your another assumption where you equate Athiesm with "Ethical Humanism" is another senseless mumbo jumbo with no semblance to fact. This means that a Non Atheist person cannot be "Ethical Human".

As in the case of accomplishments, you are again wrong factually. The Science in Ayurveda, Yoga, Arts like BharatNatyam, Kuchipudi, knowledge in Vedic Maths, Philosphies in Charvaka, Shaktism, have a clear Hindu/Dharmic context to it. So yes, the India that you see (even the Orginal name Bharat is Dharmic) has a clear Hindu culture.

Only a person living with self loathing inferiority complex would deny this context. Come out of your hate and accept who you are. You may not like it but still there is no reason to hate it.

He is a "Ethical Humanist" who will shamelessly promotes the eating of Beef as a proud Anglo saxon "enlightened" tradition

That is the true measure of his "ethics" and the measure of his intellectual "depth".

He is so "ethical" that after denouncing the "vile" caste system, he is quick to declare himself "brahmin"

A desi don quixote.

 

[Lurch Adams]

The opening sentence where u say Hindutva is like Islamism is correct in religious sense. For that matter Islamism is also like Buddhism. So nothing wrong in Hindutva, Islamism or Budhism but I know what you are trying to imply. And in that respect , no Hindutva is not like Islamic or Jehadi Terrorism. This is an old trick where people like you try to equate RSS with Nazi Party, Modi with Hitler and Hindutva with Islamic Terrorism.

You have both misunderstood what I wrote as wel as the difference between religion and political doctrine. ISLAM is a religion. ISLAMISM is a political doctrine. Same applies to Hinduism and Hindutva. If you do not know that basic difference, you are yet another ignoramus who is proud of his ignorance.

Your another assumption where you equate Athiesm with "Ethical Humanism" is another senseless mumbo jumbo with no semblance to fact. This means that a Non Atheist person cannot be "Ethical Human".

Ethical humanism is not a term coined by myself. It is a term coined by prominent athiests to describe what they believe in, when asked that question. Again, you obviously haven't read about any of this and are just guessing your way through the argument. Using a defined term does not mean that anyone not invoking it is outside the purview of the general words from which it is derived. Did that make any sense or that is also mumbo jumbo to you?

As in the case of accomplishments, you are again wrong factually. The Science in Ayurveda, Yoga, Arts like BharatNatyam, Kuchipudi, knowledge in Vedic Maths, Philosphies in Charvaka, Shaktism, have a clear Hindu/Dharmic context to it. So yes, the India that you see (even the Orginal name Bharat is Dharmic) has a clear Hindu culture.

Blah blah blah. Again, trying to steal the accomplishments of Hindus or proto-Hindus and attributing it to a hundred year-old political ideology is stupid beyond belief. Please go and practice that bharatnatyam.

Only a person living with self loathing inferiority complex would deny this context. Come out of your hate and accept who you are. You may not like it but still there is no reason to hate it.

I am what I make myself. I am not where I was born, or my tribe, or even my family. Failures try to seek comfort and recognition in group identities. Successful people make their own identity. It is you who suffers from such insecurity that you cannot imagine an existence beyond the identities shoved down your throat.

Good for you.

 

[HinduFacist]

You have both misunderstood what I wrote as wel as the difference between religion and political doctrine. ISLAM is a religion. ISLAMISM is a political doctrine. Same applies to Hinduism and Hindutva. If you do not know that basic difference, you are yet another ignoramus who is proud of his ignorance.

Supreme Court of India defined hindutva as a way of life. Are they another "ignoramus" too?

Ethical humanism is not a term coined by myself. It is a term coined by prominent athiests to describe what they believe in, when asked that question. Again, you obviously haven't read about any of this and are just guessing your way through the argument. Using a defined term does not mean that anyone not invoking it is outside the purview of the general words from which it is derived. Did that make any sense or that is also mumbo jumbo to you?

Its mumbo jumbo when people claiming to be "ethical Humanism" go on to abuse others and others ideology in a blatant display of Bigotry

Blah blah blah. Again, trying to steal the accomplishments of Hindus or proto-Hindus and attributing it to a hundred year-old political ideology is stupid beyond belief. Please go and practice that bharatnatyam.

Again the "proto Hindu". .... WTF is that ?

Is it same as "proto dharma" ? ... know about "proto bharatnatyam" ?

I am what I make myself. I am not where I was born, or my tribe, or even my family. Failures try to seek comfort and recognition in group identities. Successful people make their own identity. It is you who suffers from such insecurity that you cannot imagine an existence beyond the identities shoved down your throat.

Good for you.

Says the man who was singing the virtues of "Nehruvian/Lohiaite/Fabian socialism, Ambedkar's vision, secularism, Dravidianism, and federalism,"

Know what Hypocrisy means ? I am sure you don't.

A successful person has MULTIPLE Identities, not a single one ...... the more identities you have the less narrow minded you become.

Maybe its time you evolved and gained a few new identities.

 

[Lurch Adams]

How predictable.

Almost every fool caught with his pants down in pdf claim to be "brahmins". Rather than lie about your heritage, be proud of being a dalit christian.



Modi gets on your nerve, doesn't he ?



Mission accomplished.

I have marked you down for "special consideration". Only I will wait for you to post some other stupidity in pdf and will then prove you wrong and humiliate you by exposing your shallow thought process and vile prejudices.

Unlike you, I do not need to use personal attack to cover up incompetence and ignorance.



LOL...ask that to the Supreme Court of India Don't beg me to educate you.

What is this "Brahminism" ? ........ another invention from the MacCulley school of losers ?

Hindutva continues to be a way of life and BJP continues to be a political party that propagates this value system. Same as your "brahminic" Kautilya.


Wait and watch, while I enjoy your discomfort and butt hurt.



Better Togadia and even Godse than Macaulay.

As for building the future India, it will be build drawing from our vast experience of building a sophisticated society and civilisation that gave birth to "fictional" Panini, Aryabhatta, Sushruta, Mayasura, Tyagaraja, parasurama, Baudhayan, Brahmgupta, Bhaskaracharya, Mahaviracharya, Kanad, Varahamihira and Nagarjuna.

Now google to find out who they are. No bastard child of Macculay would have heard of them.



WTF is a "proto Hindu" ?

"Hinduism as we know it" ? Who is this "we" ?.......... correct that to "Hinduism as I know it".

Dharma continues to be the guiding philosophy of Hindutva. To bad you cannot handle the truth.



WTF is a "Brahmin supremacist" ? ...the Vedas explain the Varna and Buddha propagated the varna.



Nice Strawman

Hindutva is a "way of life" as declared by the Supreme court of India.

Maybe you can preach to the SC and make them see the "light" ?

Retarded smileys, liberally interspersed with "if I don't know something must be wrong" arguments, garnished with selective half-truths.

I will address the only half-truth that made sense. The Supreme court decision that you talked about is Dr. Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo versus Prabhakar K. Kunte (1996). A Constitutional bench of the SC has set aside that decision as part of another matter that it is hearing on how political parties and their candidates misuse religion to swing votes and what constitutes corrupt electoral practice under Section 123 (3) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951.

More specifically, the constitutional bench has already clarified that Hinduism and Hindutva are not the same. So if you want to read a transcript of why your mixing up the two is wrong, then read the decision.

Apart from that, happy ignorance to you!

 

[HinduFacist]

Retarded smileys, liberally interspersed with "if I don't know something must be wrong" arguments, garnished with selective half-truths.

I will address the only half-truth that made sense. The Supreme court decision that you talked about is Dr. Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo versus Prabhakar K. Kunte (1996). A Constitutional bench of the SC has set aside that decision as part of another matter that it is hearing on how political parties and their candidates misuse religion to swing votes and what constitutes corrupt electoral practice under Section 123 (3) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951.

More specifically, the constitutional bench has already clarified that Hinduism and Hindutva are not the same. So if you want to read a transcript of why your mixing up the two is wrong, then read the decision.

Apart from that, happy ignorance to you!

EPIC FAIL.

The supreme court judgement was that Hindutva/Hinduism is a way of life of the people in the sub-continent and “is a state of mind.”.

 

[Lurch Adams]

Supreme Court of India defined hindutva as a way of life. Are they another "ignoramus" too?

The explanation is not for you, but for those others who might read and wish to understand.

The question before the court was that since asking for votes on the basis of religion violates the Representation of peoples Act, so is asking for votes on the basis of Hindutva illegal?

The Supreme court held that it was not illegal, because Hindutva is not the same as the Hindu religion. Now you can jump up and down as much as you want, it simply means that your theft of Hinduism as Hindutva is wrong, as per the Supreme court.

Have you been able to name the tenets of Hindutva?

Again the "proto Hindu". .... WTF is that ?

Is it same as "proto dharma" ? ... know about "proto bharatnatyam" ?

Proto is a word used in academic papers and taught in good universities - the type you didn't go to.

Says the man who was singing the virtues of "Nehruvian/Lohiaite/Fabian socialism, Ambedkar's vision, secularism, Dravidianism, and federalism,"

These are all identities a person chooses for himself. As opposed to those he is born with. To understand the difference, you have to be a human.

 

[PRC]

You have both misunderstood what I wrote as wel as the difference between religion and political doctrine. ISLAM is a religion. ISLAMISM is a political doctrine. Same applies to Hinduism and Hindutva. If you do not know that basic difference, you are yet another ignoramus who is proud of his ignorance.


Ethical humanism is not a term coined by myself. It is a term coined by prominent athiests to describe what they believe in, when asked that question. Again, you obviously haven't read about any of this and are just guessing your way through the argument. Using a defined term does not mean that anyone not invoking it is outside the purview of the general words from which it is derived. Did that make any sense or that is also mumbo jumbo to you?


Blah blah blah. Again, trying to steal the accomplishments of Hindus or proto-Hindus and attributing it to a hundred year-old political ideology is stupid beyond belief. Please go and practice that bharatnatyam.



I am what I make myself. I am not where I was born, or my tribe, or even my family. Failures try to seek comfort and recognition in group identities. Successful people make their own identity. It is you who suffers from such insecurity that you cannot imagine an existence beyond the identities shoved down your throat.

Good for you.

Your hate is making you a fool and I have no reason to help you out of the cesspool that you are currently in.
What constitute the political doctrine in Hindusim?, just naming Hindutva is something which a parrot can also do.

The use of religion in politics is something which every democracies all over the world has seen but that has not made them Theocracy and here I am talking about democracies which are secular.

And yes that prominent Athiest which have termed that term must also have some name which you prominently missed. And let me understand this, the parameter on which something to be accepted is what a "Prominent person" said ?

So yoga , Ayurveda, Vedic Maths are proto-Hindus ? Only a person with Proto-Homo Sapien intelligence can come up with such a logic.

I am what I make myself.

In that case you must be Amoeba, because it can only make itself, for the rest of us, the land, the culture, the surroundings, the education becomes part of ones identity.

Like you, I do not suffer with inferiority complex, I do make my own identity but being Indian and Sanatani is also one them. This is the identity that I got for being born in India , hence land played a role in my identity.
I am proud to be Dharmic, this is the identity that I got being born in Dharmic tradition.

 

[HinduFacist]

The explanation is not for you, but for those others who might read and wish to understand.

The question before the court was that since asking for votes on the basis of religion violates the Representation of peoples Act, so is asking for votes on the basis of Hindutva illegal?

The Supreme court held that it was not illegal, because Hindutva is not the same as the Hindu religion. Now you can jump up and down as much as you want, it simply means that your theft of Hinduism as Hindutva is wrong, as per the Supreme court.

Have you been able to name the tenets of Hindutva?

FAIL AGAIN

The SC judgement was for Hindutva AND for Hinduism. It means that Hindutva and Hinduism both are the same. It said Hinduism is a way of life and a state of mind. Same as Hindutva. Same as Hindu "religion".

Proto is a word used in academic papers and taught in good universities - the type you didn't go to.

So many words yet so little substance. You have AGAIN failed to explain what "proto hindu" means

These are all identities a person chooses for himself. As opposed to those he is born with. To understand the difference, you have to be a human.

Like you were "born a Brahmin" ? I guess that makes me a "proto Human" ?

 

[Lurch Adams]

Your hate is making you a fool and I have no reason to help you out of the cesspool that you are currently in.
What constitute the political doctrine in Hindusim?, just naming Hindutva is something which a parrot can also do.

Don't worry about my hate. You happen to believe that Hindus are the best. Focus on what such thoughts do to your brain.

The use of religion in politics is something which every democracies all over the world has seen but that has not made them Theocracy and here I am talking about democracies which are secular.

Separation of church and state, along with democracy, is the model followed in Western countries. There are occasional exceptions to the rule, such as the legal position on gay rights in some countries, or on abortion in others. But these are recognized as exceptions. No Western country is founded on the principal that Christians are the best.

So it is wrong to assume that just because there are straw instances where religion intrudes into politics, that means all secular countries must also be based on religion. That is the theory of absolutes that a fascist bent of mind subscribes to.

And yes that prominent Athiest which have termed that term must also have some name which you prominently missed. And let me understand this, the parameter on which something to be accepted is what a "Prominent person" said ?

Everyone is free to choose who they emulate. I have mentioned these names in my previous post. You could just read and then do some research. But this must be part of the same Dharmic tradition whereby ignorance is its own defence.

Who are the prominent people you are inspired by? For me they are scientists, some anthropologists, very few politicians, some economists and academics. Religion or a dominant religious identity does not enter the picture.

So yoga , Ayurveda, Vedic Maths are proto-Hindus ? Only a person with Proto-Homo Sapien intelligence can come up with such a logic.

Don't shift the goal post. The issue is whether the toxic ideology of Hindutva can lay claim to these achievements. And saying that it can would be the same as saying Salafists can lay claim to algebra, or that Christian supremacists can claim the aeroplane and electricity. Just because a Hindu, Muslim or Christian does something, does not mean that a political ideology can be credited with it.

Unless, of course, there is a clear correlation. Japan can say that it's modernization and emergence as a world power was due to the Meiji Restoration. There is enough causation. Where is the link between this way of life and Vedic maths?

In that case you must be Amoeba, because it can only make itself, for the rest of us, the land, the culture, the surroundings, the education becomes part of ones identity.

This stunning insight cannot be countered. Certainly, stupidity behind a keyboard can be rewarding at times.

Like you, I do not suffer with inferiority complex, I do make my own identity but being Indian and Sanatani is also one them. This is the identity that I got for being born in India , hence land played a role in my identity.
I am proud to be Dharmic, this is the identity that I got being born in Dharmic tradition.

Talking of inferiority complex. Could you inform me as to what educational institutions you attended? And what qualifications you attained therein? And your current professional career? Any major achievements in life?

I ask all this because it is quite evident that lack of personal achievement makes one run after retarded identities to feel good about. It is not rocket science really.

 

[intops]

It might come out some day. Who was killed in abbotabad as nobody witnessed the death of Bin Laden.

 

[HinduFacist]

Don't worry about my hate. You happen to believe that Hindus are the best. Focus on what such thoughts do to your brain.

If he doesn't have to be worried about your hate, then why are you worried about his brain ? .. another brain fart ?

Separation of church and state, along with democracy, is the model followed in Western countries. There are occasional exceptions to the rule, such as the legal position on gay rights in some countries, or on abortion in others. But these are recognized as exceptions. No Western country is founded on the principal that Christians are the best.

So it is wrong to assume that just because there are straw instances where religion intrudes into politics, that means all secular countries must also be based on religion. That is the theory of absolutes that a fascist bent of mind subscribes to.

EPIC FAIL AGAIN

In Denmark the church is a department of the state. Church affairs are government by a central government ministry, and clergy are government employees.

England's official state church has been the Church of England. The queen AND the Parliament have a say in appointing bishops. Twenty-six bishops also have ex officio seats in the House of Lords. In fact the Parliament has also passed a law that the head of England i.e. King or Queen HAVE to be Anglican.

In fact Christian religious education is taught to children in primary and secondary schools in the UK.

Greece is Officially a christian state

Iceland is officially a christian state.

Norway is a christian state and has a official "church of Norway" as directed by their constitution.

Everyone is free to choose who they emulate. I have mentioned these names in my previous post. You could just read and then do some research. But this must be part of the same Dharmic tradition whereby ignorance is its own defence.

Who are the prominent people you are inspired by? For me they are scientists, some anthropologists, very few politicians, some economists and academics. Religion or a dominant religious identity does not enter the picture.

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. But not everybody "imitate" their white masters.

Some of us have individual identity and personality that is not built on "imitation". .... our culture don't teach us to imitate, they teach us to discover the best in our-self. You are not expected to understand. You can continue to imitate MacCullay.

Don't shift the goal post. The issue is whether the toxic ideology of Hindutva can lay claim to these achievements. And saying that it can would be the same as saying Salafists can lay claim to algebra, or that Christian supremacists can claim the aeroplane and electricity. Just because a Hindu, Muslim or Christian does something, does not mean that a political ideology can be credited with it.

Unless, of course, there is a clear correlation. Japan can say that it's modernization and emergence as a world power was due to the Meiji Restoration. There is enough causation. Where is the link between this way of life and Vedic maths?

Guess what ? Hindutva govt. of Modi has made YOGA not only Tax free but has promoted it in the UN too.

So I guess it satisfies the criteria you have set. Hindutva can now claim achievements in Yoga. Now should I talk about Ayurveda ? How about the act of gifting Gita to foreign heads and propagate Dharma ?

How about the Hindutva govt. led HRD Ministry sets up exclusive panel on Sanskrit promotion ?

This stunning insight cannot be countered. Certainly, stupidity behind a keyboard can be rewarding at times.

Yes it can be. Humiliating you in public is one such reward.

Talking of inferiority complex. Could you inform me as to what educational institutions you attended? And what qualifications you attained therein? And your current professional career? Any major achievements in life?

I ask all this because it is quite evident that lack of personal achievement makes one run after retarded identities to feel good about. It is not rocket science really.

LOL..... Why are you interested in his personal life ? try to rise above such base instincts.

Taking pride in one's culture is the norm, only the insecure retard finds pleasure in self flagellation.

 

[Lurch Adams]

The SC judgement was for Hindutva AND for Hinduism. It means that Hindutva and Hinduism both are the same. It said Hinduism is a way of life and a state of mind. Same as Hindutva. Same as Hindu "religion".

You couldn't be more wrong.

Let me explain how a court works. Any judicial pronouncement is made only with reference to a provision of law. The judge is not sitting there to adjudicate on questions of idle interest. Especially the Supreme Court deals exclusively with questions of law.

In the case that is causing you such pleasure, the issue was as follows. Section 123(3) of the Representation of People Act makes it unlawful to solicit votes on the basis of religion. So the court had to decide that whether an appeal to Hindutva amounted to an appeal to religion. The court held that since Hindutva and Hinduism were not the same, therefore it did not amount to an illegality.

In any world apart from the world of the Chaddi Gang, that would mean that the court held exactly the opposite of what you claim. Yet, you continue with your buffoonery. All you needed to do was to read a 50 page judgement. It will explain everything. But you won't.

So the same lack of intellect that prevented you from getting into a good school or university and makes you a failure in life, apparently makes you a stud on PDF.

Why am I not surprised?

So many words yet so little substance. You have AGAIN failed to explain what "proto hindu" means

Proto means in its earliest form. Unlike religious of the book, Hinduism does not have a clear starting point. The first reference to the word "Hindu" was in an inscription of Darius I circa 6th century BCE. All that means is that outsiders referred to the people beyond the Indus by that name. So early forms of the religion will be referred to as proto.

Again, understanding that requires elementary reading. Which you won't do. You and your fellow Chaddis deal exclusively in emoticons.

Like you were "born a Brahmin" ? I guess that makes me a "proto Human" ?

It takes an especial form of lowlife to understand, once someone has said that they reject the caste system, that they would be lying about it.

Now if I said I love endurance running, which I do, and told you that my marathon timing is 3:45, which it is, you are welcome to doubt it. Since I value my accomplishments in this field, I may try to embellish facts to make myself look better.

But the caste system is something which, if it was not so pernicious, would be comical. So while you are welcome to believe what you may, since this is a public forum, people reading this will understand something about you. Your claims that I must be lying shows a mindset of a liar.

 

[egodoc222]

More like Modi-Nawaz friendship to me at works.

If that was the case Pakistan govt wouldn't have asked China to block the sanctions against jud....it's purely because of Chinese and American pressure.
Chinese have gotten themselves in a quagmire...they cannot change their stance at UN and loss their face and they know hafeez is a ticking time bomb....in the event of another Mumbai like attack...world will roast China for supporting him.
With a president like trump in the office...US has threatened Pakistan with a travel ban which might lead to further bans.
So Pakistani govt had no choice but to put him on terror list...which it wanted to do a long time ago if not for the army interference.
PS: and sir while you are here...please clean the thread!!

 

[Kashmiri Pandit]

Its of no use .

Didn't their experts said on Indian Media that , When it comes to Kashmir , every Pakistani is Hafiz Saeed

 

[PRC]

Don't worry about my hate. You happen to believe that Hindus are the best. Focus on what such thoughts do to your brain.

As I said your hate is making you fool and blind, no where I said that your foolishness concerns me. You are free to flaunt it with full glory. Also, I never said Hindus are THE BEST, my argument was against your pathological hate against Hindus and their culture which is not based on facts but hatred rooted in your own low life existence. Unlike many here I am open to my culture/religion/country constructive criticism based on FACTS, not hatred.

Separation of church and state, along with democracy, is the model followed in Western countries. There are occasional exceptions to the rule, such as the legal position on gay rights in some countries, or on abortion in others. But these are recognized as exceptions. No Western country is founded on the principal that Christians are the best.
So it is wrong to assume that just because there are straw instances where religion intrudes into politics, that means all secular countries must also be based on religion. That is the theory of absolutes that a fascist bent of mind subscribes to.

OK , so when it happens in Western countries it is an exception but when it happens in India it is a rule, a tyranny of Hindutva ? Probably poor Savita Halappanavar's husband was not aware of this exceptional rule of the modern Western countries. The poor soul lost his wife because of the denied abortion because Ireland happens to be "a Catholic country", but off course that was an exception. The Ireland's constitution which is heavily inspired by the church is still considered to be a country where there is a clear distinction between Church and the State in your eyes.
Nope, no where I said that secular democracies where religion influence politics is correct. What I meant was when it influences, we generally do not blame the religion and calls it evil, specially in the case of Western countries. Take the example of USA where in every election Republicans emphasizes the fact that how Christian-Judeo tradition is the foundation of the country but no one here comes running with his backyard on fire and yells how evil Christianity is. No one here makes the unique distinction that Christianity is fine but its "political component" needs to be defeated at all cost. This is something unique to the converts of India and that is how hatred based on self loathing inferiority complex interferes in your judgement.

Everyone is free to choose who they emulate. I have mentioned these names in my previous post. You could just read and then do some research. But this must be part of the same Dharmic tradition whereby ignorance is its own defence.
Who are the prominent people you are inspired by? For me they are scientists, some anthropologists, very few politicians, some economists and academics. Religion or a dominant religious identity does not enter the picture.

I do not know your religion and had no intention to insult it but you on the other hand are hell bent on insinuating me because of my Dharmic lineage. Shallow human beings who can't build a logical argument based on facts do that. But anyhow, my Dharmic tradition does not teaches me ignorance, it teaches me to question. There was a reason in my previous post I mention Dharmic philosophies such as Charvaka and Shaktism and let me tell you, both these philosophies are virtually opposite to each other. It is upto me what I chose for myself, even atheism is a valid Dharmic philosophy but offcourse you being " self declared Brahmin" would know this.
Its great that scientists inspires you but what about those scientist who are inspired by Geeta or other Dharmic literature ? Again shallow talking with no point to prove.

Don't shift the goal post. The issue is whether the toxic ideology of Hindutva can lay claim to these achievements. And saying that it can would be the same as saying Salafists can lay claim to algebra, or that Christian supremacists can claim the aeroplane and electricity. Just because a Hindu, Muslim or Christian does something, does not mean that a political ideology can be credited with it.

Unless, of course, there is a clear correlation. Japan can say that it's modernization and emergence as a world power was due to the Meiji Restoration. There is enough causation. Where is the link between this way of life and Vedic maths?

I am not, it is you who came up with gems like "proto-hindus" and blamed me for attributing Ayurveda, Yoga to the undeserving Hindus. Nope I did not attributed email to hindus just because a hindu happen to be a founder of it, I attributed things which are rooted in Vedic culture. I hope your excellency who happens to be a Brahmin will now understand the difference.

Yes see no causation in the invention of the zero and the numeric system used by Hindus and Vedic Maths ?
Read (or atleast google it) Surya Siddhanta, Arya Siddhanta and the work of Bhaskara, Aryabhatta , Varahmihira and you will find the causation of Vedic Maths and some of the architecture and astronomy literature created during that period. It is not a co incidence that the ancient Indians were one of the leading authorities in Astronomy, medicine, Mathematics, fine art etc. Were they were the only one, nope but they had accomplishments of their own independent effort and it is this heritage that you do not want to accept because of your inferiority complex.

This stunning insight cannot be countered. Certainly, stupidity behind a keyboard can be rewarding at times.

I still encourage you to try, with your proto-human intelligence anything is possible.

Talking of inferiority complex. Could you inform me as to what educational institutions you attended? And what qualifications you attained therein? And your current professional career? Any major achievements in life?

I ask all this because it is quite evident that lack of personal achievement makes one run after retarded identities to feel good about. It is not rocket science really.

I can very well self declared my self to be an alumni of "University of New York" but that will put me on the same pedestal with someone who happens to be a "self declared Brahmin" and this is not something which I can do. The point is how does it matter ?
I accept who I am and very very comfortable with that fact. If there is something which I need to change within myself, I try to put a genuine effort to achieve that without bringing mine or someone's other religion/culture into it.