Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why? to give a threat to USA/EUNeed MIRV ICBM’s!
ankit kumar has too many news from inside paksitan wow
MIRV is already there in Ababeel. Hope it will be inducted soon after final trial.Need MIRV ICBM’s!
Redundancy? You make nuclear warfare sound like Data backup2-3 per each Indian target is the redundancy - and every possible target that would the very idea of the Indian non-existent for 1000 years has been catered for.
Yes - it usually is redundant. The US and USSR held stockpiles to nuke each other multiple times over. The idea was that if certain warheads were destroyed then others could take its place.Redundancy? You make nuclear warfare sound like Data backup
But Pakistanis have called me and my mother Indian inside Pakistan to my face - despite both her and I being born in this country.Nope he is not...
What is the production and maintenance cost if 1 15kt weapon? Do you know?We should have at least 1000 low yield nukes keeping in mind that NATO and QUAD can be our future enemies. Low yield nukes with yield of under 15kt should be enough to destroy any enemy base or wipe out a big part of a city.
What is the production and maintenance cost if 1 15kt weapon? Do you know?
But Pakistanis have called me and my mother Indian inside Pakistan to my face - despite both her and I being born in this country.
What a fighter jet needs to deliver a nuclear warhead . What mirages have which f16 don't?Read the report a few days ago when it was released.
There is a lot of exaggerations and half-truths, like the unsubstantiated claim that F-16s were modified for nuclear role. It is always been Mirages and soon JF-17. You don't tie your strategic assets with a platform that can be sanctioned during time of war. This is why JF-17 exists.
View attachment 777262
A total waste of resources.
The money would be better spent on an SLV programme to build our space infrastructure.
The only sensible line from this article is the last one
Nope he is not...