What's new

Pakistan drugged out on defense & debt

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
Pakistan drugged out on defense & debt

Pakistan is spending more on debt servicing than on defense and seven times more on arms than on primary schools, according to a United Nations report that calls on governments and aid donors to seek ways of converting unproductive spending to more productive investment.

Higher defense and debt costs helped to widen the fiscal deficit to 490.4 billion rupees (US$5.7 billion), or 2.9% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the six months to December.

Debt servicing in the period, the first half of the fiscal year, rose to 310.4 billion rupees while 215 billion rupees was spent on defense purposes, says the report of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

Pakistan spends 1.5% of GDP on education, and only 0.5% of GDP on health. Defense spending and debt servicing consume more than 60% of the national budget each year.

Rising defense spending and debt servicing make it increasingly difficult for the government to meet its revised budget deficit target of 4.7% of GDP, or 807 billion rupees for the current fiscal year, which will end on June 30.

"The gap between national revenues and expenditures widened to 490 billion rupees in the first half of the current financial year that virtually made the year-end budget deficit target of 4.7% of GDP unrealistic," according to a report in The Express Tribune. In the first six months, total income of federal and provincial governments remained at 989.6 billion rupees against expenditure of 1.48 trillion rupees.

The federal government borrowed 119.6 billion rupees from external sources. Out of this, 72.6 billion rupees was used for retiring or servicing external debt, while the balance of 47 billion rupees was utilized to finance the deficit.

Critics say that 63 years after gaining independence, Pakistan is yet to move from a "national security state" to a welfare state in which over 60% of the national budget would be spent on human and social development.

One can see the precedence of "security" over "public welfare" from the budgetary allocations made by Pakistan for education, heath and defense in the current fiscal year, when the government allocated 21.4 billion rupees for education and 16.9 billion rupees for the health sector, while 442 billion rupees were allocated for defense spending.

Under a series of mini-budgets, spending on education, healthcare and infrastructure has been lashed, while defense spending has been increased. For example, the government in October projected that it would increase its defense budget by 25%, or 110 billion rupees, to 552 billion rupees for the current fiscal year.

Pakistan has one of the world's largest out-of-school populations, at about 7.3 million.

The UNESCO report said diversion of national resources to the military and loss of government revenue meant that armed conflict shifted the responsibility for education financing from government to households.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's ruling elite maintain their perks and privileges at all costs. Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani recently gave the go-ahead for luxury parliamentary lodges to be built at a cost of 3 billion rupees.

The country's debt servicing obligations have been squeezing the resources meant for development projects, particularly in the social sector, while more than 75% of the 170 million population, particularly those in rural areas, live in highest level of deprivation level and lowest level of economic development.

The Public Sector Development Programme budget for the present fiscal year has been cut by 46% to 150 billion rupees in order to limit the fiscal deficit.

Even in times of crises, such as during last year's devastating flooding, defense priorities have not been changed. According to the United Nations, the floods brought an economic and humanitarian disaster bigger than the December 2004 Asian tsunami and last year's Haiti earthquake, and affected about 20 million people.

This year's budget envisaged a 17% increase in defense spending, while next year's is expected to increase it further, leaving little scope for improved public welfare.

The consequences assets will be a large, unhealthy, non-skilled, illiterate and poor population and undeveloped and underdeveloped natural resources.

The country's economy is forecast to grow 2.3% in the fiscal year to June 30. If that falls short, to under 2%, per capita income, an important benchmark to determine the health of an economy, will shrink given annual population growth of 2%. More people will fall below the poverty line and struggle to survive on less than a dollar a day.

Pakistan's total external debt jumped 49% in the four years to June 2010, to $55.62 billion from $37.24 billion in June 2006. Even after paying $6.03 billion during the past three years, the foreign debt burden is still $53.7 billion.

In the fiscal year to last June, the government spent $3.1 billion on debt servicing - $2.34 billion as payment in principal and $775.5 million as interest. There is no plan for retiring the country's debt burden - though the government does have a solid plan for securing more loans from international lenders.

A welfare state safeguards the welfare of people by looking after their needs for education, healthcare and infrastructure, as it prioritizes social development in its annual budget allocations.

It is next to impossible to imaging Pakistan becoming a welfare state where the rich still easily avoid paying taxes; where at least 500 billion rupees are spent on defense, and hundreds of millions of rupees are set aside as interest on foreign loans.

Asia Times Online :: South Asia news, business and economy from India and Pakistan
 
.
Friends what is happening????

Pakistan is spending more on debt servicing than on defense and seven times more on arms than on primary schools, according to a United Nations report that calls on governments and aid donors to seek ways of converting unproductive spending to more productive investment.

Pakistan spends 1.5% of GDP on education and only 0.5% of GDP on health. Defense spending & debt servicing consume more than 60% of the national budget each year.
 
.
It is not a new thing Pakistan has been a National security state rather than a social security state, since their inception..

Believe it or not, in some ways situations has improved from before, considering as of now they are spending 60% of their budget on defence and Debt servicing..but at the time of their inception they allocated 70% of their budget defence alone.

This way they are in the ranks of North korea..which is the only other National security state in the world.
 
.
Pakistan spends more than 2% each on education and health, not 1.5% and 0.5%. LOL at ares in comparing Pakistan to North Korea. But can't expect anything else from this guy. Spreads his misinformation everywhere. Pakistan spends 3.8% of GDP on defence. US spends somewhere around 4.75% on defence. North Korea is probably into double figures.

If Pakistan is into North Korea's ranks, what is the country that so many of you bharatis look up to, want to emulate and one that you personally are residing in?
 
.
Pakistan spends more than 2% each on education and health, not 1.5% and 0.5%. LOL at ares in comparing Pakistan to North Korea. But can't expect anything else from this guy. Spreads his misinformation everywhere. Pakistan spends 3.8% of GDP on defence. US spends somewhere around 4.75% on defence. North Korea is probably into double figures.

If Pakistan is into North Korea's ranks, what is the country that so many of you bharatis look up to and one that you personally are residing in?

Really are you going to produce outdated sources to prove you point..I told you last time also total Pakistani allocation for health + education is not more than 2 %..this article vindicates my point.

Are you still going stick with 3.8% allocation ..even after I proved it to you how it is above 4% ..you accepted it that day.

Pakistan and North korea are same in terms because they both have National security state since there inception..where spending on defence consistently exceeds ..spending on social sector.
 
.
Oh dear me, I provided you sources from 2009 FROM THE UN for my numbers. You're seriously not that stupid to think that health spending can go from around 2.5% to 0.5% in one year? There was nothing to suggest that that's what happened.

Your sources are a blog and a news website that is not exceedingly well known as reliable. This also states Pakistan's defence spending as 4.75%. You by all accounts in trying to bring it up as high as possible could only bring it up to 4%. I accepted a defence spending on 3.8%, nothing more.

Btw how does Pakistan's defence spending exceeds social spending? Pakistan spends around 2.5% on education and at least 2% on health. For North Korea it's probably it's probably 20% on military. I guess for a bharati though, making yourself believe such ridiculous things about Pakistan is definitely on the cards.
 
.
Btw, even the blog that you used as a source before didn't contain what you said it contained. It's this article's word, and the article is not backing up what it is saying from a reliable source (the article itself is printed on a website known for reliability), to UN's word.
 
.
Oh dear me, I provided you sources from 2009 FROM THE UN for my numbers. You're seriously not that stupid to think that health spending can go from around 2.5% to 0.5% in one year? There was nothing to suggest that that's what happened.

Your sources are a blog and a news website that is not exceedingly well known as reliable. This also states Pakistan's defence spending as 4.75%. You by all accounts in trying to bring it up as high as possible could only bring it up to 4%. I accepted a defence spending on 3.8%, nothing more.

Btw how does Pakistan's defence spending exceeds social spending? Pakistan spends around 2.5% on education and at least 2% on health. For North Korea it's probably it's probably 20% on military.

Do provide this yrs source which proves your point ..mine is right here..Asia Times is not a blog ..infact your education and health does not exceed 2%.

I did not include your WOT spending and pensions in the figure calculated.

Do provide updated sources to back up your claim and figures..because I can.

PS : I am busy right now .. I ll get back to you tmrow..you have the whole day to search for your sources.
 
.
When you post something about Pakistan, make it factual instead of propaganda.

A little bit of looking into the situation would do a lot of good. Pakistan is essentially fighting a war. The mobilization, deployment and active operations chew up money fast. This is the reason that expenditures have gone up. When UN reports are produced, they are focused on certain aspects, such as how much Pakistan spends, however what typically goes missing (because of the scope) is why Pakistan is spending what she is spending.

As far as a national security state claim is concerned, Pakistan is nowhere close to being in such category. Defence, as part of the GDP is in the 2-3% range which is much lower than even what Israelis spend on their defence.

Despite the upward spend on defence due to ongoing operations, Pakistan sits snugly in the same Human development category as India, which is medium human development index despite latter's smaller % of national GDP being spent on defence.

Lastly, Pakistan's spend on defence, at the current levels, is a temporary phenomena due to ongoing activities. It will not be sustained at such levels.
 
.
Do provide this yrs source which proves your point ..mine is right here..Asia Times is not a blog ..infact your education and health does not exceed 2%.

I did not include your WOT spending and pensions in the figure calculated.

Do provide updated sources to back up your claim and figures..because I can.

PS : I am busy right now .. I ll get back to you tmrow..you have the whole day to search for your sources.

Lol ares... nice attempt at being trying to be smart. I've provided you these sources before, and no doubt you remember these sources, but you're trying to act smart in that you think I won't be able to find these sources, and you'll "win" the argument, even though you'll know deep down that I am right.

But alas, I have these sources right here. From UN, not from a run of the mill website that is not that reliable

UNdata | record view | Public expenditure on education as % of GDP

UNdata | record view | Total expenditure on health as a percentage of gross domestic product

Now go and spoil yourself. Now see, didn't take me a day to find them, only 5 minutes, and 2 minutes to type the post.
 
.
When you post something about Pakistan, make it factual instead of propaganda.

A little bit of looking into the situation would do a lot of good. Pakistan is essentially fighting a war. The mobilization, deployment and active operations chew up money fast. This is the reason that expenditures have gone up. When UN reports are produced, they are focused on certain aspects, such as how much Pakistan spends, however what typically goes missing (because of the scope) is why Pakistan is spending what she is spending.

As far as a national security state claim is concerned, Pakistan is nowhere close to being in such category. Defence, as part of the GDP is in the 2-3% range which is much lower than even what Israelis spend on their defence.

Despite the upward spend on defence due to ongoing operations, Pakistan sits snugly in the same Human development category as India, which is medium human development index despite latter's smaller % of national GDP being spent on defence.

Lastly, Pakistan's spend on defence, at the current levels, is a temporary phenomena due to ongoing activities. It will not be sustained at such levels.

That's an important point, and again, I should mention that these haters make it sound like Pakistan spends some extraordinary amount of money on its military. No, even in war time, its 3.8% of GDP being spent on military.
 
.
^ You provided a 5 yr old(for health) and 2 yrs(for education) old source..which part of recent you do not understand?
 
. .
*facepalm*

It's from 2009, einstein.

Suit yourself ..you provides 1yr 8 month old source..which not exactly recent..you have have had two union budgets after that...going from 2.5% to 1.5% is not that big a stretch.
 
.
Education one is from 2009 at least. Which is just one year old (2011 has just started).

The health one... well that is the latest one available from a reliable source.

I ask again, where is this article getting its numbers from?

i.e. no, you don't have a source ares.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom