What's new

Pakistan demands UK send ex-PM Nawaz Sharif home to be jailed

Imran Khan just can't help but prove again and again what a clueless idiot he is, and that the only thing he can ever do is blame others for his own stupidity.

First his government let NS go! Then him and his idiotic worshippers blamed the courts. Then they all pretended to be shocked that NS falsified the medical reports :rolleyes1: And now they want to shift the blame onto the UK if hes not forced back :hitwall:


Judiciary

iK is the only one trying to fix this clown show
 
.
The deal was made between the government and the Sharif's. The Sharif family hasn't honored their word.

It is up to Britain now to deliver him. If they don't relations are going to be affected seriously.

Sharif's never honor their word so why believe them. The absconder should be bought back and his plasma count should be reduced once in Pak to pre-ran off levels.
 
.
At this moment, the Pakistani Govt is a joke... first you sent CONVICTED Criminal to abroad (there is no such example exists in the past 300 years of history anywhere in the world). Now you're writing a letter to the British Government to send back this criminal.

This asshole will use his own statement in the court in which he clearly stated "Nawaz Sharif tab wapis ayeengay jab unkay doctor kaheengay woh theek hogaye hain aur woh theek hain ub safar kiliye"

this statement was "ACCEPTED" by the court + Govt. You'll see in response, British Govt nay yehi utha kar is besharam Govt kay mooo pe maarna hey jihonay kudh is begerat k bahir bheja hey

CASE CLOSED!

Govt is clown, Establishment is a joker! Banana Republic...
Agree 100%
 
.
Dont be a sheep. Do your own research and figure out why and how the courts reached their verdict and the governments complicity in this whole affair.

NS was let go, and everyone from a chaprasi to the prime minister in Pakistan fully knew there and then that he wouldn't be returning. Lets not now pretend that this was some big surprise.
Govt knew Nawaz Sharif won't return. That's why it demanded 7 billion RS indemnity bond which the Lahore High Court quashed and replaced with Rs 50 worthless stamp paper.
Agree 100%
Govt is bound by court decisions. When court removes Nawaz Sharif name from ECL with a written order, then govt cannot do anything. Blame the court not the govt that opposed Nawaz Sharif leaving the country without 7 billion RS indemnity bond.
 
.
Govt knew Nawaz Sharif won't return. That's why it demanded 7 billion RS indemnity bond which the Lahore High Court quashed and replaced with Rs 50 worthless stamp paper.

Govt is bound by court decisions. When court removes Nawaz Sharif name from ECL with a written order, then govt cannot do anything. Blame the court not the govt that opposed Nawaz Sharif leaving the country without 7 billion RS indemnity bond.
dont be surprised if the same court declares him honest (ameer ul momeeneen) and indicts imran khan in sugar case..
 
.
dont be surprised if the same court declares him honest (ameer ul momeeneen) and indicts imran khan in sugar case..
Lahore High Court is staffed with pro-Sharif family judges. Expect no change for a few decades.
 
.
Govt knew Nawaz Sharif won't return. That's why it demanded 7 billion RS indemnity bond which the Lahore High Court quashed and replaced with Rs 50 worthless stamp paper.

I won't be able to change your mind. Ive realised there is no convincing die hard supporters. Hence why I asked you dig in and do your own research.

But truth is IK/Bajwa/co-conspirators allowed NS to leave. Everything else is a drama.
 
. .
But truth is IK/Bajwa/co-conspirators allowed NS to leave. Everything else is a drama.
There is no conspiracy. Everything happened in the courts. Medical reports were doctored, media narrative was bought to pressuirze everybody into getting pro Nawaz verdict.
We know this to be the truth, the named know it because they were behind it. The only people made fools of are IK’s own supporters ironically.
We are not fools. We knew what was going on. There was intense internal pressure in cabinet to not allow Nawaz Sharif leave the country. Eventually govt agreed to send him abroad for 4 weeks on 7 billion Rs bond which the courts rejected, giving the convicted criminal freedom to never return back home. So you should blame the corrupt court not the govt that fought hard for his stay in Pakistan.
 
Last edited:
.
We know this to be the truth, the named know it because they were behind it. The only people made fools of are IK’s own supporters ironically.
ofcourse IK allowed it and it was the smart thing to do..

when discussion went from him being a convict to..whether he is sick or not..that is the time when IK lost..

see noone, not even a doctor can predict anything..nawaz sharif is diabetic and is very old, he can drop dead anytime, even today, he can have an MI/heart attack.

question isnt whether he has cardiovascular disease or not..question is should a convict be allowed to leave and what could have he done differently in UK then inpakistan..

the answer of both of these questions are no, a convict shouldnt be allowed & in pakistan you get everything, you can have stents and bypass...so why did he left..
 
.
Former leader has been in London for nearly a year after temporary release from prison on medical grounds

https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2F37f5bcd4-b9f9-45c9-918d-8c56bac777a5.jpg


Nawaz Sharif claims Islamabad’s corruption cases against him are politically motivated © REUTERS

Tom Burgis in London

Priti Patel is “duty bound” to deport Nawaz Sharif, the former Pakistan prime minister, to serve his jail sentence for corruption, his successor’s government has told the UK home secretary in a letter seen by the Financial Times.

The fallen ruler has been residing in London for nearly a year after being temporarily released from prison in Pakistan and given permission to leave the country for an eight-week trip for medical treatment.

The demand from Pakistan’s prime minister, Imran Khan, follows a pledge of tough treatment for foreign criminals under new post-Brexit immigration rules by Ms Patel, a member of the UK’s Conservative government noted for her hardline stance on border controls.

Mr Sharif “has been responsible for pillaging the state and I trust that you will be supportive of our efforts to bring those responsible for corruption to account”, Mr Khan’s adviser, Mirza Shahzad Akbar, wrote to Ms Patel on October 5.

After the Panama Papers revealed hidden assets belonging to Mr Sharif’s family, he resigned as prime minister in 2017. The following year a Pakistan court sentenced him to seven years’ imprisonment for corruption. He has claimed that this and other corruption cases against him are politically motivated.

In November 2019 he flew to London after the Pakistan authorities granted him leave to travel abroad for eight weeks to seek treatment for various conditions. He sought an extension of his temporary release but the Pakistan authorities refused on the grounds that he had offered inadequate medical evidence and ordered Mr Sharif to return home.

Mr Sharif, who did not respond to a request for comment, remains in London, from where he has broadcast attacks on Mr Khan’s government.

According to records submitted to the Pakistan authorities, he has given as his London address the very flat on London’s opulent Park Lane that led to his downfall. His family’s ownership of the flat was exposed by the leak of secret files from the Panama law firm Mossack Fonseca.

The letter to Ms Patel urges her to use her “extensive powers” to deport Mr Sharif, arguing she is “duty bound” to do so. It cites immigration rules that criminals sentenced to four years or more must be refused leave to remain in the UK. A Pakistan court has issued a warrant for Mr Sharif’s arrest, the letter adds.

A Pakistan official said the UK had not yet formally responded. The Home Office declined to comment.

“Foreign politicians with convictions relating to corruption should not enjoy impunity in Britain. Nor should their unexplained wealth, stashed in luxury London properties, fall out of the reach of law enforcement,” said Daniel Bruce, head of Transparency International UK.

“The UK government should work constructively with democratic countries such as Pakistan to uphold the rule of law. Action should also be taken to seize and return illicit assets held here in Britain in order to deliver justice for the victims of corruption. Failure to act on cases such as this, earns the UK an unwelcome reputation as a safe haven for dirty money.”


A serious question arises. What does Britain want? Does Britain desire to become a safe haven for corrupt third rate absconders? Why hasn't Britain delivered Nawaz Sharif after 8 weeks despite assurances? A year has passed and the PTI government is still clueless and helplessly pleading Britain to return Nawaz Sharif.
Tbh if forced Britain will probably send him back he is of no use to them..
 
.
ofcourse IK allowed it and it was the smart thing to do..
IK didn't allow it, LHC did. How many times I have to tell you that?
see noone, not even a doctor can predict anything..nawaz sharif is diabetic and is very old, he can drop dead anytime, even today, he can have an MI/heart attack.
IHC said unless govt takes responsibility of NS health, we have no choice but to give him bail on health grounds. This is Pakistani courts for you:
"Chief Justice Minallah said: "Do not put the entire responsibility (of the outcome of the verdict) on the court's shoulders. If you are confident that nothing will happen to Nawaz Sharif till Tuesday, then take responsibility."
the answer of both of these questions are no, a convict shouldnt be allowed & in pakistan you get everything, you can have stents and bypass...so why did he left..
He left because LHC removed his name from ECL which is entirely govt matter.
 
Last edited:
. .
https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2F37f5bcd4-b9f9-45c9-918d-8c56bac777a5.jpg


What is the guy in the navy blue shirt doing? Is he praying for Godfather Nawazoo?

Tbh if forced Britain will probably send him back he is of no use to them..

Thus far the Brits have refrained from doing so. The PTI government has requested Nawaz Sharif's extradition previously. The Brits haven't responded to my knowledge.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom