What's new

Pakistan cruise missiles pose key challenge to India

indian_foxhound

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
1,827
Reaction score
0
With Pakistan arming itself with nuclear capable cruise missiles with stealth capabilities, a new dimension has been added to India’s maritime security challenges, says leading Indian defence expert retired Commodore C. Uday Bhaskar.

“Taking a leaf from China, Pakistan seems to be investing in cruise missiles,” he said, referring to Pakistan’s indigenously developed cruise missile Babur, which can carry both nuclear and conventional warheads.

“This has lowered the index of stability in the region,” Bhaskar said at an Asia-Pacific security seminar on India’s Maritime Security Challenges at the East-West Centre Tuesday.

But in dealing with issues ranging from low intensity conflict and piracy to major-power strategic contests, India’s key challenges were resource constraints, ship building capabilities, maritime infrastructure and the changing geo-political environment, he said.

The rapidly changing strategic environment in South Asia and emergence of an “extended global common” posed another challenge, said Bhaskar, currently a distinguished fellow with the Society for Policy Studies and a visiting fellow at the National Maritime Foundation in New Delhi.

Over the next decade, the US, China and India will form a critical strategic triangle and their individual relationships with the ASEAN, Iran and Pakistan will have significant regional and global implications, he said.

Given its distinctive geography and the recent shift of global maritime focus from the Atlantic-Pacific combine to the Indo-Pacific continuum, the importance of the Indian Ocean Region in India’s national security calculus has greatly increased in the post-Cold War/post 9-11 era, Bhaskar said.

Yet the Indian Navy mandated to address this wide spectrum security domain received about a sixth of an overall defence budget of less than $40 billion in fiscal 2012-13, he said.

He noted that within the Indian military matrix, the navy was referred to as the “Cinderella service”.

India’s ship building capabilities too were “not really flattering”, blighted as they were by time and cost overruns, Bhaskar said.

He listed the ability to build credibly fight capable ships as another key challenge.

The country’s maritime infrastructure too was “less than rudimentary”, he said. He added that that in terms of ports, India’s top port Mumbai was listed at the 30th spot in the world.

However, Bhaskar said there was a growing awareness at the national level that over the next two decades India’s future aspirations and anxieties will be increasingly shaped by its ability to address the challenges and opportunities of the maritime domain.

‘Pakistan cruise missiles pose key challenge to India’ | idrw.org
 
.
Why and how?

Shooting down cruise missiles is much much easier than a ballistic missile.
 
. . . .
cruise missiles are headache for both countries, India has yet to establish one with an effective range of 500km and above, their is no reports of today yet cruise missiles being shot down by any one on the other Hand their are plenty of reference of ballistic missiles being shot down all over the places.

Cruise missiles are not Bollywood Villians that are easy to shoot down

Cruise missiles are a real headache
 
.
cruise missiles are headache for both countries, India has yet to establish one with an effective range of 500km and above, their is no reports of today yet cruise missiles being shot down by any one on the other Hand their are plenty of reference of ballistic missiles being shot down all over the places.

Cruise missiles are not Bollywood Villians that are easy to shoot down

Cruise missiles are a real headache

Sub-sonic cruise missile are not a real threat in naval warfare. Even an aircraft can engage sub-sonic cruise missile. The anti-aircraft gun fitted on ships can bring down sub-sonic cruise missile.:sniper:

Yes, in land warfare, it is not easy to detect and depends much on the terrain. In desert area with moderate sand dunes, it can be detected but in hilly or high sand dunes areas it is harder to detect.


And I really don't know what the author was thinking while documenting this article. The TITLE of the article, doesn't match with its content. :no:
 
. . .
Sub-sonic cruise missile are not a real threat in naval warfare. Even an aircraft can engage sub-sonic cruise missile. The anti-aircraft gun fitted on ships can bring down sub-sonic cruise missile.:sniper:

Yes, in land warfare, it is not easy to detect and depends much on the terrain. In desert area with moderate sand dunes, it can be detected but in hilly or high sand dunes areas it is harder to detect.


And I really don't know what the author was thinking while documenting this article. The TITLE of the article, doesn't match with its content. :no:

Pakistan Does not have any Cruise missiles that it uses for Anti-ship Role, ALL of them are for land based Targets be it they are costal inland or airforce bases, pakistan does not have developed an anti ship missile yet, It uses C803, excoet*,harpoon,ld-60

anti-ship missiles are not the same as cruise missiles

India tested nirbhoy which failed so they are working on cruise missiles now, pakistan has already in production and deployment phase of its cruise missiles, Those are (Babur and Raad)


"thank you come again":cheers:
 
. .
people here seems to forget that every radar detects at a certain angle Of Attack of the incoming Threats, thats why their is a different Radar for Ballistic missiles and aircrafts even the Pattriot Uses different Radar and Fire control of engaging Ballistic missile threats and aircraft threats respectively if you wikkipedia it it shows 2 different range of engaging targets

Cruise missiles are only possed by handfull of countries not more then 5 or 6 out of the whole world

you would need a totally different Radar and fire control to engage a cruise missiles as its AOA(angle of attack) is different from Ballistic missile and Aircraft
 
.
people here seems to forget that every radar detects at a certain angle Of Attack of the incoming Threats, thats why their is a different Radar for Ballistic missiles and aircrafts even the Pattriot Uses different Radar and Fire control of engaging Ballistic missile threats and aircraft threats respectively if you wikkipedia it it shows 2 different range of engaging targets

Cruise missiles are only possed by handfull of countries not more then 5 or 6 out of the whole world

you would need a totally different Radar and fire control to engage a cruise missiles as its AOA(angle of attack) is different from Ballistic missile and Aircraft

may be you don't know what aerostat radar is.
 
. .
cruise missiles are headache for both countries, India has yet to establish one with an effective range of 500km and above, their is no reports of today yet cruise missiles being shot down by any one on the other Hand their are plenty of reference of ballistic missiles being shot down all over the places.

Cruise missiles are not Bollywood Villians that are easy to shoot down

Cruise missiles are a real headache

In their fantasy world of shining Bollywood anything is possible.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom