What's new

Pakistan considers taxing Nato Afghanistan trucks

Perhaps you are talking of bharti kids.. than!

While Pakistani kids know... GHQ is there last hope.

Since... i'm born, i have never seen the politicians changing.... I have constantly seen Nawaz Sharif... firing general after general.

I have seen politicians appointing forces chiefs against recommendations of institution.

I have only seen Generals serving Pakistan and guarding Pakistan.

Now you two get back to topic.

plz for GOD sake, m not a supporter of any politician even i hate them more than anything nut the thing is that our generals also not too innocent... be realistic man... dont be sympathizer
 
.
plz for GOD sake, m not a supporter of any politician even i hate them more than anything nut the thing is that our generals also not too innocent... be realistic man... dont be sympathizer

I agree with you but I think its a question of lesser evils
 
. . . . .
i dont think route will be opened, i think the BBC is using an old news which came a long time ago and has mixed it with the current one..

nowhere has the article suggested that thats the latest news coming directly from islamabad

On Sunday, Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani told the BBC that Pakistan may continue its blocking of Nato convoys into Afghanistan for several weeks.

i think sunday was just yesterday isnt it??
 
.
No more ‘tax holiday’: Pakistan to end tax breaks for NATO trucks

Pakistan is considering charging “millions of dollars” in taxes on Nato trucks and tankers which pass through Pakistan on their way to Afghanistan under what was previously a ‘verbal understanding’.

There had been no official agreement with the US or Nato regarding the use of Pakistani land and facilities, an official of the defence ministry told the BBC.

The senior officer said that there was neither any tax nor a fee for the use of Pakistani ports and storage facilities.

Pakistan’s fragile alliance with the US crashed to new lows after November 26, when Nato air strikes killed 24 Pakistani soldiers in what Islamabad said was a deliberate attack.

Islamabad sealed its Afghan border to Nato convoys, closures that entered a 17th day on Monday, forcing trucks back to Karachi.

The move was part of a list of recommendations passed by a parliamentary committee following the attacks.

Another official of the defence ministry, who chose to stay anonymous, said that the parliamentary committee also recommended that a tax be imposed on oil supplies to Nato as is imposed on every litre sold to Pakistanis.

“Pakistan will now impose tax on Nato supplies in light of the international conventions and practices, which will give the national exchequer billions of rupees of income,” he added.

Replying to a question, he said that the issue of any tax on the US or Nato supplies never came up during the last decade. He said that it was practically a kind of a ‘tax holiday’ for Nato and the USA.

He further said that recently when containers carrying supplies for Nato were attacked, the Frontier Corps was called to protect them without any payment.

Meanwhile, Foreign Office spokesperson Abdul Basit also confirmed that he was not aware of any agreement between Pakistan and Nato or the US regarding the use of Pakistani land, ports and other facilities for the supply of goods through Turkham or Chaman.

Communications Minister Arbab Alamgir recently said that the use of roads by Nato containers put an extra burden on Pakistani roads and, thus, have inflicted the national exchequer a loss of $1b, according to a survey completed two years ago.

He said that Pakistani roads suffer a damage of Rs20 to 25 billion every year as daily about 350 to 400 containers pass through Chaman or Turkahm border to Afghanistan.

He said that the issue was raised with the US through ministry of foreign affairs but it remained unanswered.

No more
 
.
Yep they should be taxed as our ports, roads, machinery and facilities all require money to maintain and run!
 
.
The senior officer said that there was neither any tax nor a fee for the use of Pakistani ports and storage

“Pakistan will now impose tax on Nato supplies in light of the international conventions and practices, which will give the national exchequer billions of rupees of income,” he added.

Is this a joke? Definitely not seeing this is Pakistani way of doing things.

Instead of taxing the supplies they accepted the taint of aid. We're still getting the money without doing anything, they thought, why go through all the trouble of writing bills, tax laws, getting them approved and enforced when money can fall in our laps without all that hassle.

US got to call the money they would have paid in taxes as aid - they would have paid a lot more in taxes- the rest of the world got to call Pak a begger and Pakistani donkeys were happy at not going through official channels to get the money which Pak rightly deserved.
 
.
Is this a joke? Definitely not seeing this is Pakistani way of doing things.

Instead of taxing the supplies they accepted the taint of aid. We're still getting the money without doing anything, they thought, why go through all the trouble of writing bills, tax laws, getting them approved and enforced when money can fall in our laps without all that hassle.

US got to call the money they would have paid in taxes as aid - they would have paid a lot more in taxes- the rest of the world got to call Pak a begger and Pakistani donkeys were happy at not going through official channels to get the money which Pak rightly deserved.

Blame it all on mush..dictatorship when it suits them and democracy when it suits them..actual need is a puppet compliant government!
 
.
Mush was a donkey indeed who lacked foresight. But the PPP donkeys should have changed the rules of interaction between the US and Pak vis a vis the supply routes, when they came in power.
 
.
"Money talks, sometimes it sings and sometimes it shouts!"

Sometimes loss of face is more important than loss of money. (Note I deliberately used the phrase "loss of face" which is not the same thing as "honor".)

Pakistan's transport lobby (in which present and former members of the Armed forces have a large stake) could continue carrying NATO goods under the guise of Afghan transit trade. But overt resumption of NATO transit would cause unbearable loss of face.
 
.
Our political elite has no guts, they were brought in with Uncle Sam's wheeling and dealing(and the NRO they got their previous puppet Mush to do). I hope the military manages to stand it's ground diplomatically.

They should remember that the US had us paying very punitive "parking charges" for F-16s they were refusing to deliver. We'd already paid for them in full, they kept giving us this inkling of hope that if we kept paying these charges the US just might give these F-16s to us.

So, borrowing from the same playbook, we should *heavily* tax these supplies if they must pass through. If the US refuses to pay, then these may be "confisicated".
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom