What's new

Pakistan calls for Israel to stop ‘land grabbing’ in Palestinian territory

Omar1984

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 12, 2008
Messages
12,296
Reaction score
0
Pakistan calls for Israel to stop ‘land grabbing’ in Palestinian territory

UNITED NATIONS, Mar 13 (APP): Pakistan on Monday underscored the need for intensified efforts to resolve the “core issue” of Palestine for Middle East peace, saying now is the time for a strong UN Security Council signal to Israel to stop ‘land grabbing’ in occupied Palestinian territory. “With the continuation of the Israeli settlement activity, hope for the Palestinians to have a viable State of their own is fading fast,” Ambassador Abdullah Hussain told a high-level meeting of the 15-member Council chaired by the British Foreign Secretary and attended by the Foreign Ministers of France, Guatemala, Russia, Portugal and Germany, as well as the US Secretary of State.


Associated Press Of Pakistan ( Pakistan's Premier NEWS Agency )
 
.
palestinians should stop terror strikes against israel through proxy groups and should engage with israel in peace efforts on table.
hamas like groups fire rockets and israelis reply hard.The result is more palestinains causalities of innocents.

and pakistan have no right in interfering in the matters of other country.let them resolve bilaterally.
 
.
palestinians should stop terror strikes against israel through proxy groups and should engage with israel in peace efforts on table.
hamas like groups fire rockets and israelis reply hard.The result is more palestinains causalities of innocents.

and pakistan have no right in interfering in the matters of other country.let them resolve bilaterally.
u guys had no right to interfere in balochistan and yet, u guys passed a bill on it :no:
 
.
palestinians should stop terror strikes against israel through proxy groups and should engage with israel in peace efforts on table.
hamas like groups fire rockets and israelis reply hard.The result is more palestinains causalities of innocents.

and pakistan have no right in interfering in the matters of other country.let them resolve bilaterally.
I guess we need to finish the rough state of Israel to stop the innocent pplz bloodshed there and maintain peace within the world....:smokin:
 
.
I guess we need to finish the rough state of Israel to stop the innocent pplz bloodshed there and maintain peace within the world....:smokin:
Callous as well as backward.

Nicky Larkin: Israel is a refuge, but a refuge under siege

Through making a film about the Israeli-Arab conflict, artist Nicky Larkin found his allegiances swaying

Sunday March 11 2012
I used to hate Israel. I used to think the Left was always right. Not any more. Now I loathe Palestinian terrorists. Now I see why Israel has to be hard. Now I see the Left can be Right -- as in right-wing. So why did I change my mind so completely?

Strangely, it began with my anger at Israel's incursion into Gaza in December 2008 which left over 1,200 Palestinians dead, compared to only 13 Israelis. I was so angered by this massacre I posed in the striped scarf of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation for an art show catalogue.

Shortly after posing in that PLO scarf, I applied for funding from the Irish Arts Council to make a film in Israel and Palestine. I wanted to talk to these soldiers, to challenge their actions -- and challenge the Israeli citizens who supported them.

I spent seven weeks in the area, dividing my time evenly between Israel and the West Bank. I started in Israel. The locals were suspicious. We were Irish -- from a country which is one of Israel's chief critics -- and we were filmmakers. We were the enemy.

Then I crossed over into the West Bank. Suddenly, being Irish wasn't a problem. Provo graffiti adorned The Wall. Bethlehem was Las Vegas for Jesus-freaks -- neon crucifixes punctuated by posters of martyrs.

These martyrs followed us throughout the West Bank. They watched from lamp-posts and walls wherever we went. Like Jesus in the old Sacred Heart pictures.

But the more I felt the martyrs watching me, the more confused I became. After all, the Palestinian mantra was one of "non-violent resistance". It was their motto, repeated over and over like responses at a Catholic mass.

Yet when I interviewed Hind Khoury, a former Palestinian government member, she sat forward angrily in her chair as she refused to condemn the actions of the suicide bombers. She was all aggression.

This aggression continued in Hebron, where I witnessed swastikas on a wall. As I set up my camera, an Israeli soldier shouted down from his rooftop position. A few months previously I might have ignored him as my political enemy. But now I stopped to talk. He only talked about Taybeh, the local Palestinian beer.

Back in Tel Aviv in the summer of 2011, I began to listen more closely to the Israeli side. I remember one conversation in Shenkin Street -- Tel Aviv's most fashionable quarter, a street where everybody looks as if they went to art college. I was outside a cafe interviewing a former soldier.

He talked slowly about his time in Gaza. He spoke about 20 Arab teenagers filled with ecstasy tablets and sent running towards the base he'd patrolled. Each strapped with a bomb and carrying a hand-held detonator.

The pills in their bloodstream meant they felt no pain. Only a headshot would take them down.

Conversations like this are normal in Tel Aviv. I began to experience the sense of isolation Israelis feel. An isolation that began in the ghettos of Europe and ended in Auschwitz.

Israel is a refuge -- but a refuge under siege, a refuge where rockets rain death from the skies. And as I made the effort to empathise, to look at the world through their eyes. I began a new intellectual journey. One that would not be welcome back home.

The problem began when I resolved to come back with a film that showed both sides of the coin. Actually there are many more than two. Which is why my film is called Forty Shades of Grey. But only one side was wanted back in Dublin. My peers expected me to come back with an attack on Israel. No grey areas were acceptable.

An Irish artist is supposed to sign boycotts, wear a PLO scarf, and remonstrate loudly about The Occupation. But it's not just artists who are supposed to hate Israel. Being anti-Israel is supposed to be part of our Irish identity, the same way we are supposed to resent the English.

But hating Israel is not part of my personal national identity. Neither is hating the English. I hold an Irish passport, but nowhere upon this document does it say I am a republican, or a Palestinian.

My Irish passport says I was born in 1983 in Offaly. The Northern Troubles were something Anne Doyle talked to my parents about on the nine o'clock News. I just wanted to watch Father Ted.

So I was frustrated to see Provo graffiti on the wall in the West Bank. I felt the same frustration emerge when I noticed the missing 'E' in a "Free Palestin" graffiti on a wall in Cork. I am also frustrated by the anti-Israel activists' attitude to freedom of speech.

Free speech must work both ways. But back in Dublin, whenever I speak up for Israel, the Fiachras and Fionas look at me aghast, as if I'd pissed on their paninis.

This one-way freedom of speech spurs false information. The Boycott Israel brigade is a prime example. They pressurised Irish supermarkets to remove all Israeli produce from their shelves -- a move that directly affected the Palestinian farmers who produce most of their fruit and vegetables under the Israeli brand.

But worst of all, this boycott mentality is affecting artists. In August 2010, the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign got 216 Irish artists to sign a pledge undertaking to boycott the Israeli state. As an artist I have friends on this list -- or at least I had.

I would like to challenge my friends about their support for this boycott. What do these armchair sermonisers know about Israel? Could they name three Israeli cities, or the main Israeli industries?

But I have more important questions for Irish artists. What happened to the notion of the artist as a free thinking individual? Why have Irish artists surrendered to group-think on Israel? Could it be due to something as crude as career-advancement?

Artistic leadership comes from the top. Aosdana, Ireland's State-sponsored affiliation of creative artists, has also signed the boycott. Aosdana is a big player. Its members populate Arts Council funding panels.

Some artists could assume that if their name is on the same boycott sheet as the people assessing their applications, it can hardly hurt their chances. No doubt Aosdana would dispute this assumption. But the perception of a preconceived position on Israel is hard to avoid.

Looking back now over all I have learnt, I wonder if the problem is a lot simpler.

Perhaps our problem is not with Israel, but with our own over-stretched sense of importance -- a sense of moral superiority disproportional to the importance of our little country?

Any artist worth his or her salt should be ready to change their mind on receipt of fresh information. So I would urge every one of those 216 Irish artists who pledged to boycott the Israeli state to spend some time in Israel and Palestine. Maybe when you come home you will bin your scarf. I did.

Nicky Larkin's 'Forty Shades of Grey' will premiere in Dublin in May;

Welcome to Facebook - Log In, Sign Up or Learn More fortyshades;

Nicky Larkin
 
. .
Whats with the winks? Makes you look like a moronic pervert moron. We are mostly men on here - less of the female winking attitude.
You come from a nation that self nominates itself to be the police of the world and interfere in everything that doesnt involve you - then you think you can tell us to keep our nose out of this? I suggest you give the trolling a rest today.
Pakistan should be commended to stand up and speak up against atrocities being committed by the zionists - racist international thugs - only existance dut to the daily charity handed to them by their zionist bum chums you have endorsed as you leaves. Now do me a favor dont come onto our site to tell us what we can and cant talk about and what we can and cant interfere with.
sheeeeeesh.

try your best!!!!!! i do think,you should concentrate on your self.
 
.
Whatever it is - No country should interfere with another countries issues.
 
. . . .
palestinians should stop terror strikes against israel through proxy groups and should engage with israel in peace efforts on table

excuse me!!!!

when was the last time you heard of Palestinian terrorism against israel? Pray tell!


hamas like groups fire rockets and israelis reply hard.

a ceasefire has been in place for quite some time now....HAMAS was elected democratically by the people of Gaza. The real travesty here is that the west has either helped divide Palestinians or they just remained on the sidelines

it was the PLO, allegedly.....not Hamas.


The result is more palestinains causalities of innocents.

which you clearly dont care about, since you are providing the arms (at free or subsidized rates)


and pakistan have no right in interfering in the matters of other country.let them resolve bilaterally.

talk to your President Obama -- who pledged to help mediate in the conflict but reneged on his promise due to the power of power-PACs and the right-wingers who seem to be at ease with blindly supporting israel while Palestinians live in misery every day
 
.
Calling will do nothing! Solve your internal problem, become a developed nation, then fight for your brother! Illegal Zionists will have to leave Palestine today or tomorrow!!!
 
.
Pakistan's role and Pakistan's SAY in this matter is negligible.


Amb. Haroon was simply addressing the 15-member council and remaining in-line with Pakistan's stated position on this issue, so i wouldnt exactly call it ''interfering'' because if that's interfering then that's all the UN does from morning to the time offices close
 
.
What's up with Pakistan and its interest in "core issues"..Kashmir, Palestine etc.

Why not keep terror emanating out of its own land as the "core issue" for once, just once ?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom