What's new

Pakistan blows hot and cold on peace with India

ghazi52

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Mar 21, 2007
Messages
102,927
Reaction score
106
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Pakistan blows hot and cold on peace with India

Pakistan's flip-flop on allowing Indian cotton imports points to an unresolved struggle between civilian and military power centers
By FM SHAKILAPRIL 25, 2021
Print

Pakistan-Line-of-Control.jpg

A Pakistan army soldier stands guard on the Line of Control in Abdullah Pur village in Bhimber district of Pakistani-controlled Kashmir on February 5, 2021. Photo: AFP/Muhammad Daud
PESHAWAR – Pakistan is blowing hot and cold on normalizing trade relations with India, an early setback to Prime Minister Imran Khan’s officially ballyhooed shift from a geostrategic to geo-economic foreign policy orientation.
Khan’s government, which announced the shift in February with a surprise renewed ceasefire with India, now faces resistance to the move from quarters of the powerful, autonomous military establishment that apparently view resumption of currently blocked trade with rival India as a strategic threat.
Khan’s announcement last month that his government would permit Indian imports of cotton and sugar was inexplicably reversed the following day, a flip-flop that some analysts and observers saw as a reflection of the premier’s weakness in implementing sensitive policies vis-à-vis the military top brass.
Energy Minister Hammad Azhar did not set out any conditions for the restoration of business activities with New Delhi upon the trade resumption announcement, which was rejected by the federal cabinet the next day.
Before the cabinet reversed the decision, Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari tweeted that unless India relaxes its hard stand on the Kashmir imbroglio, normal trade relations could not be restored.

Some believe the policy volte-face could ultimately be a ploy aimed to give Khan greater negotiating leverage on wider trade and strategic issues if and when he meets Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the sideline of a proposed SAARC summit likely to be held in Islamabad in coming months.
Pakistan-Imran-Khan-March-2020.jpg

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan delivers a speech during the Refugee Summit Islamabad to mark 40 years of hosting Afghan refugees, in Islamabad on February 17, 2020. Photo: AFP/Aamir Qureshi
Many hope for a new breakthrough between the two rivals over contested Kashmir, the hot core of the two nuclear powers’ long-running conflict. It’s not immediately clear how the trade flip-flop has been perceived in New Delhi, though the lurch has inevitably put a certain damper on the bilateral warming trend.
What is clear is that the reaffirmed ban on Indian cotton imports will put more pressure on Pakistan’s crucial garment industry, which employs around 40% of the national workforce, at a time of economic distress.
Pakistan’s own cotton production is in decline due to recent poor weather, pestilence and farmers’ recent transition to higher-margin crops. This year’s cotton crop is projected to be at its lowest level since 1992.
Imports have thus soared to keep garment factories running, nearly doubling to 3.68 million dales over the nine months to March year on year, official statistics indicate.

The surge in cotton imports has contributed to a recent deterioration of Pakistan’s current account, which this year has slipped back into deficit after recording a rare surplus from July to December last year.
The nation’s trade deficit skyrocketed by 120% to US$3.3 billion in March as Khan’s government struggles to tame inflation including in cotton prices.
Cheaper imports from India, some analysts suggest, would help to alleviate the budding cotton crisis and associated economic unraveling, but the military seems keener to squeeze strategic concessions from New Delhi before resuming imports.
Pakistan-cotton.jpg

A Pakistani laborer picks cotton in a field in Qazi Ahmed in the district of Nawabshah on September 27, 2017. P: AFP/Asif Hassan
Jan Achakzai, an ex-adviser to Pakistan’s Balochistan provincial government, says Khan is in a tight, twin military and economic squeeze.
He said that recent reports in local newspapers suggesting a dramatic rapprochement with India through so-called Track-2 diplomacy may have peeved the military establishment.

Achakzai said that military chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa – or any other top brass chief for that matter – can not afford to show leniency towards India in the “perception domain”, which he says would undercut the army’s ability to galvanize public support in any hot conflict scenario.
“Logically no chief would shoot himself in the foot this way, including the current [commander] General Bajwa,” he added.
He said the prevailing ground realities, namely in Kashmir, show there has been no meaningful rapprochement between the two long-time rivals, which he claims are still stuck in their negative approaches towards each other via what he refers to as “hybrid war.”
“It is the government’s handling of India and Kashmir policy that has brought the PM [Khan] in a head-on collision with the military establishment,” he said.
Recent news that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) played a key behind-the-scenes mediating role in getting India and Pakistan to agree to the renewed ceasefire agreement announced in late February have added a hard-to-gauge wrinkle to the diplomatic equation.

Delhi and Islamabad have had a ceasefire in place since 2003, but both sides have regularly breached the agreement. In 2020, over 5,000 “Line of Control” violations were reported in Kashmir.
The UAE’s top envoy to Washington, Yousef Al Otaiba, confirmed in a virtual discussion last week with Stanford University’s Hoover Institution that his nation was mediating between India and Pakistan to help the nuclear-armed rivals reach a “healthy and functional” relationship. UAE apparently played a role in brokering February’s renewed ceasefire agreement.
News reports that covered the speech quoted the UAE diplomat as saying “top intelligence officers” of both countries had held secret talks in Dubai in January this year, in an attempt to calm heightening tensions in Kashmir.
Jammu-Kashmir-1.jpg

An Indian paramillitary walks before health officials posted at a voting booth duirng third phase of DDC, ULP elections in Ganderbal District, Indian Administered Kashmir on 04 December 2020. Photo: Muzamil Mattoo/NurPhoto via AFP
In an apparently related development, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi traveled to the UAE on April 17, marking Islamabad’s first official contact after the Emirati ambassador’s public disclosure at the Stanford University event.
India has not made any official comment over the now publicly reported UAE-brokered secret mediation.
The reconciliation process was apparently still on track when Pakistan’s army chief General Bajwa said at a security dialogue held in Islamabad late last month that “Stable Indo-Pak relations” were key to opening the untapped economic potential of South and Central Asia – a pronouncement consistent with Khan’s stated shift to “geo-economic” policies.
At the same event, Bajwa pleaded for the resolution of the Kashmir dispute with India through “peaceful means.” He also acknowledged that a rapprochement with India will always be susceptible to derailment by spoiler groups, not least his own armed forces.
“However, we feel that it is time to bury the past and move forward. But for resumption of the peace process or meaningful dialogue, our neighbor will have to create a conducive environment,” he added.


 
. . . . .
About this article, same old BS that its the Pakistan army that does not allow rapprochement etc. Not a single mention of how Kashmir is now facing an internal struggle. Kashmiris have been humiliated to a devastating degree.

Pakistan army is actually not doing enough for J and K. Sorry to say, military establishment seems busy in dealing with ultimate crooks like Shahbaz and Zardari.

Many not all Pakistani writers of the english press are amongst the most disgusting creatures under the skies.
 
. . . .
the fate of this nation is in Allah's hands. he will appoint the leader (or daaku) we deserve.

It is amazing we have never produced an Erdogan, a Mahatir, a Lee Kwan yu, a Deng Xiaping, a Park Chung Hee.

All these leaders in a decade reformed their countries to become literally tiger economies. I have never found a definite answer as to why no Pakistani military or civil leader could be like these leaders who changed their country's destiny forever.
 
.
Central Punjab (barring may be Faisalabad district) will vote for Nawaz Sharif no matter what.
...and that my friend is the biggest problem as to why the people are taken for granted by these corrupt thugs.
About this article, same old BS that its the Pakistan army that does not allow rapprochement etc. Not a single mention of how Kashmir is now facing an internal struggle. Kashmiris have been humiliated to a devastating degree.

Pakistan army is actually not doing enough for J and K. Sorry to say, military establishment seems busy in dealing with ultimate crooks like Shahbaz and Zardari.

Many not all Pakistani writers of the english press are amongst the most disgusting creatures under the skies.
Agree 100% with you on this point. . I have put forward this question to the forum as to why do we produce so many self hating traitors in pakistan? This guy, ayesha Siddiqua, Haqanni and a very long list of other traitors that write trash like this.
 
Last edited:
.
It is amazing we have never produced an Erdogan, a Mahatir, a Lee Kwan yu, a Deng Xiaping, a Park Chung Hee.

All these leaders in a decade reformed their countries to become literally tiger economies. I have never found a definite answer as to why no Pakistani military or civil leader could be like these leaders who changed their country's destiny forever.

i thought about this a bit after i read your comment. my initial thoughts are that Erdogan was elected by religious Turks and some secular-ish Turks that dont want to live in shame constantly about Turkey's great past and were tired of the interference of the secular Turkish military and their coups. but there is no question that a lot of religious Turks were the main voterbase of Erdogan.

but in Pakistan, before Imran Khan became big enough and before Panama Papers, most religious people here would vote for corrupt maulanas that were attached to one corrupt party or another because they had a bigger beard, classical Islamic education, etc. so they were voting for somewhat superficial things. when the middle class (some religious, some less so) got big enough, aware enough, fedup enough of the usual thugs, they latched on to Imran Khan and voted him in. i still think a big chunk of PTI voters (mostly working class) are just voting for him because of the Panama Papers scandal and the fact that they dislike Sharifs and the incompetence of the latest Zardari/Bhutto (Bilawal bibi) more than Imran Khan.

i think the average PTI voter mostly seems to be patriotic, pro-Islam, pride in Islam's history, pro-Kashmir, wont tolerate army bashing, pro-civilian supremacy, anti-corruption, pro-economic development, welfare state, poverty alleviation, etc, and this mixture is great and needs to be cultivated further. most of Pakistan believes in some of these ideals, and that would make a huge majority, but it takes time for it to be cultivated into become regular voters of a party and for the party ideology to be indoctrinated into them, like the PPP ideology is indoctrinated into many in Sindh. best way to spread the message is by being in power, and if he can control the inflation then Imran Khan will win reelection Inshallah and continue the indoctrination process.

for me, Imran Khan's greatest legacy even if he never wins another election would be to cultivate a large voter base that has those characteristics i listed because its a winning combination and hopefully leave us with a young, honest leader that can become Prime Minister and keep leading us. Imran Khan also said his "greatest accomplishment will be that he tried to give Pakistanis a vision, courage to stand for our rights, that he tried to make us an independent and sovereign state", and that "when he goes to Allah that he will say that he tried his best to wake the people up to recognise their rights and fight for it".

as long as Imran Khan stays on this path, i will support him, and i dont believe he will falter and give up till the day he dies, so i will support him till the day i die. only a true muslim could face the challenges and ridicule he has and keep going forward with his agenda/manifesto, and in my eyes the only person that could oppose him is a munafiq. often when i am feeling low after price of this or that goes up, or some hurdle being put in Pakistan's way by the bureaucrats, effective media campaign of lies against PTI, etc, i just watch this video and it gets me going again. also, remember the stories of the Prophets, who kept doing the right thing, even if they died/murdered and couldnt convince the people. our job is to do everything in our power, and the success/failure is for Allah to decide.

 
Last edited:
.
he will definitely lose voters if he starts trade with india without reinstating Article 370.
As much as I agree with you brother. But in order to benefit the overall country this might be the lesser of the two evils. While Pakistan is controlled by the Mafia and the ruling elites who are in bed with this mafia other than hanging them this is what's left.
The current government should import everything and make it cheaper. Let the hoarders hoard the flour and sugar and cotton and rice and let it all go to waste.
The public is mentally not capable of making decisions for themselves and would sell their own grandmothers for a plate of biryani.
The fear of Allah SWT has gone from them. Even in this blessed month they lie and cheat for their own profits.
I am glad I don't live in Pakistan.
Very heartfelt sadness but true
 
.
There are 100 seats in NA from this area. N league is also making inroads in Karachi by alliance. NA 249 may be lost to them.

If Noon wins election in Pakistan the folks pack your bags and leave as fast as you can even if you have to run to India.
 
.
i thought about this a bit after i read your comment. my initial thoughts are that Erdogan was elected by religious Turks and some secular-ish Turks that dont want to live in shame constantly about Turkey's great past and were tired of the interference of the secular Turkish military and their coups. but there is no question that a lot of religious Turks were the main voterbase of Erdogan.

but in Pakistan, before Imran Khan became big enough and before Panama Papers, most religious people here would vote for corrupt maulanas that were attached to one corrupt party or another because they had a bigger beard, classical Islamic education, etc. so they were voting for somewhat superficial things. when the middle class (some religious, some less so) got big enough, aware enough, fedup enough of the usual thugs, they latched on to Imran Khan and voted him in. i still think a big chunk of PTI voters (mostly working class) are just voting for him because of the Panama Papers scandal and the fact that they dislike Sharifs and the incompetence of the latest Zardari/Bhutto (Bilawal bibi) more than Imran Khan.

i think the average PTI voter mostly seems to be patriotic, pro-Islam, pride in Islam's history, pro-Kashmir, wont tolerate army bashing, pro-civilian supremacy, anti-corruption, pro-economic development, welfare state, poverty alleviation, etc, and this mixture is great and needs to be cultivated further. most of Pakistan believes in some of these ideals, and that would make a huge majority, but it takes time for it to be cultivated into become regular voters of a party and for the party ideology to be indoctrinated into them, like the PPP ideology is indoctrinated into many in Sindh. best way to spread the message is by being in power, and if he can control the inflation then Imran Khan will win reelection Inshallah and continue the indoctrination process.

for me, Imran Khan's greatest legacy even if he never wins another election would be to cultivate a large voter base that has those characteristics i listed because its a winning combination and hopefully leave us with a young, honest leader that can become Prime Minister and keep leading us. Imran Khan also said his "greatest accomplishment will be that he tried to give Pakistanis a vision, courage to stand for our rights, that he tried to make us an independent and sovereign state", and that "when he goes to Allah that he will say that he tried his best to wake the people up to recognise their rights and fight for it".

as long as Imran Khan stays on this path, i will support him, and i dont believe he will falter and give up till the day he dies, so i will support him till the day i die. only a true muslim could face the challenges and ridicule he has and keep going forward with his agenda/manifesto, and in my eyes the only person that could oppose him is a munafiq. often when i am feeling low after price of this or that goes up, or some hurdle being put in Pakistan's way by the bureaucrats, effective media campaign of lies against PTI, etc, i just watch this video and it gets me going again. also, remember the stories of the Prophets, who kept doing the right thing, even if they died/murdered and couldnt convince the people. our job is to do everything in our power, and the success/failure is for Allah to decide.



Erdogan like Mahatir and lee and others had the support across the board. Erdogan enjoys support across ethnic religious divide. Why? He is credited with bringing fairly clean governance. Yes his govt has many many flaws but he has transformed turkey.

Mr. Khan has the spark and he also has support from across the board - religious, liberal, ethnic, linguistic lines, but he is facing an insurmountable challenge from everywhere and even from the Pakistani establishment. Lets see what happens.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom