Pakistan army chief advocates dialogue on Kashmir issue

[anant_s]

Pakistan army chief advocates dialogue on Kashmir issue

Qamar Javed Bajwa

HIGHLIGHTS

• This stance is divergent from the approach the country’s army has employed so far
• We did not bring nuclear weapons to South Asia, he said
• The General also said that Pakistan paid the price for the wars started by superpowers

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has called for the resolution of the Kashmir dispute+ through political and diplomatic means, a stance divergent from the approach the country's army has employed so far.

Bajwa's statement at his annual 'defence day' speech this week comes two days after Pakistan foreign minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif admitted for the first time that internationally proscribed terrorist organisations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba andJaish-e-Muhammad were operating from within the country.Without naming India but referring to it as a "neighbouring country", Bajwa said, "We did not bring nuclear weapons to South Asia. And even now these weapons are simply a guarantee of peace in answer to a neighbouring country which is high on power. It is this country which has brought unconventional war to the South Asian region."
The General said, "We have paid the price for the wars started by super powers, in the form of terrorism, extremism and economic loss. We are abiding by our policy that we will not allow our soil to be used against any country, and expect the same of other countries." The Pakistan military leadership's change of approach gains significance in light of a consolidated global fight against terrorism. Pakistan has recently come under fire from all quarters, including the US, for harbouring terrorists.


Emphasising that peace is essential for prosperity, Bajwa added, "The welfare of millions of people of these two countries is linked with permanent peace. Instead of insulting Pakistan and using force against Kashmiris, it is in India's favour to seek resolution of the dispute through diplomatic and political means ."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistan-army-chief-advocates-dialogue-on-kashmir-issue/articleshow/60431702.cms


@Joe Shearer @nair @jbgt90 @Levina @Kinetic @hellfire @Nilgiri

 

[Sucha Kuggu]

Pakistan army chief advocates dialogue on Kashmir issue

Qamar Javed Bajwa



ISLAMABAD: Pakistan army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has called for the resolution of the Kashmir dispute+ through political and diplomatic means, a stance divergent from the approach the country's army has employed so far.

Bajwa's statement at his annual 'defence day' speech this week comes two days after Pakistan foreign minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif admitted for the first time that internationally proscribed terrorist organisations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba andJaish-e-Muhammad were operating from within the country.Without naming India but referring to it as a "neighbouring country", Bajwa said, "We did not bring nuclear weapons to South Asia. And even now these weapons are simply a guarantee of peace in answer to a neighbouring country which is high on power. It is this country which has brought unconventional war to the South Asian region."
The General said, "We have paid the price for the wars started by super powers, in the form of terrorism, extremism and economic loss. We are abiding by our policy that we will not allow our soil to be used against any country, and expect the same of other countries." The Pakistan military leadership's change of approach gains significance in light of a consolidated global fight against terrorism. Pakistan has recently come under fire from all quarters, including the US, for harbouring terrorists.


Emphasising that peace is essential for prosperity, Bajwa added, "The welfare of millions of people of these two countries is linked with permanent peace. Instead of insulting Pakistan and using force against Kashmiris, it is in India's favour to seek resolution of the dispute through diplomatic and political means ."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistan-army-chief-advocates-dialogue-on-kashmir-issue/articleshow/60431702.cms


@Joe Shearer @nair @jbgt90 @Levina @Kinetic @hellfire @Nilgiri

Not a new thing, a 70 year old stance of Pakistan. But Pakistan also know one cant clap with one hand. India always avoiding the table talk even UN resolutions on Kashmir.

 

[BABA AGHORI]

Which resolution??? And have you read the original resolution from the UN site ??? I think not. Watch this

No fun in awakening people who are faking there sleep.

Pakistan army chief advocates dialogue on Kashmir issue

Qamar Javed Bajwa



ISLAMABAD: Pakistan army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has called for the resolution of the Kashmir dispute+ through political and diplomatic means, a stance divergent from the approach the country's army has employed so far.

Bajwa's statement at his annual 'defence day' speech this week comes two days after Pakistan foreign minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif admitted for the first time that internationally proscribed terrorist organisations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba andJaish-e-Muhammad were operating from within the country.Without naming India but referring to it as a "neighbouring country", Bajwa said, "We did not bring nuclear weapons to South Asia. And even now these weapons are simply a guarantee of peace in answer to a neighbouring country which is high on power. It is this country which has brought unconventional war to the South Asian region."
The General said, "We have paid the price for the wars started by super powers, in the form of terrorism, extremism and economic loss. We are abiding by our policy that we will not allow our soil to be used against any country, and expect the same of other countries." The Pakistan military leadership's change of approach gains significance in light of a consolidated global fight against terrorism. Pakistan has recently come under fire from all quarters, including the US, for harbouring terrorists.


Emphasising that peace is essential for prosperity, Bajwa added, "The welfare of millions of people of these two countries is linked with permanent peace. Instead of insulting Pakistan and using force against Kashmiris, it is in India's favour to seek resolution of the dispute through diplomatic and political means ."

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/pakistan-army-chief-advocates-dialogue-on-kashmir-issue/articleshow/60431702.cms


@Joe Shearer @nair @jbgt90 @Levina @Kinetic @hellfire @Nilgiri

INDIA should raise the cost of dialoge until adversary is forced to bring everything it has to table.

 

[KN-1]

Which resolution??? And have you read the original resolution from the UN site ??? I think not. Watch this

the resolution with content have been discussed here many times, it ask both Pakistani and Bharatis to keep minimum force for law and order and help UN appointed admin in conducting Plebiscite. @Azlan Haider

 

[Sergi]

the resolution with content have been discussed here many times, it ask both Pakistani and Bharatis to keep minimum force for law and order and help UN appointed admin in conducting Plebiscite. @Azlan Haider

Do you even read my post ??? I let your understanding to you and rest my case. Rest of the world understand the UN resolution to the word.

 

[Maler]

the resolution with content have been discussed here many times, it ask both Pakistani and Bharatis to keep minimum force for law and order and help UN appointed admin in conducting Plebiscite. @Azlan Haider

Can you plz guide me to the paragraph of UN resolution where it tells Pakistan to keep minimum force for law and order and help UN appointed admin in conducting Plebiscite!!!

 

[Lord Of Gondor]

"We are abiding by our policy that we will not allow our soil to be used against any country"

The number of terror camps and launch pads across the Line of Control (LoC) in Pakistan-0ccupied Kashmir have gone up and around 475 militants are waiting to sneak into the Indian side, Northern Army commander Lt Gen Devraj Anbu said on Thursday.

Sep, 07 2017 19:04:01 IST

http://www.firstpost.com/india/lt-g...itants-killed-in-kashmir-in-2017-4019787.html

The Pakistan military leadership's change of approach gains significance in light of a consolidated global fight against terrorism.

Change of approach?!
What is Omer Farooq Khani smoking?
Seems to be standard issue to all ToI LeT staffers.

 

[SingaporeGuy]

Well kashmir is muslim area isnt it?

What dialogue does india need?

Does saudi arabia go around to India whether their arabian holy cities belong to india?

Just use the nukes already

The british already made it clear.

Hindustan is India.

Hindu means hinduism.

The areas with no hindus means belong to pakistan.

India people have Problem understanding simple english much?

@proud_indian @fsayed @Alphacharlie
@SorryNotSorry @Star Wars
@#hydra#
@navtrek @doe33

@gslv mk3 @Stephen Cohen
@SOUTHie
@AUSTERLITZ
@Jackdaws @Gurjot.S
@MandarK
@hellfire @nair @Majet Raha
@Chellam
@Navin A @MULUBJA
@AnnoyingOrange @Dem!god
@Rollno21 @wiseone2 @third eye @Guynextdoor2
@Rajaraja Chola @Abingdonboy
@gulli @The_Sidewinder
@Robinhood Pandey
@neem456

@ito @Vishwabalas @Nalini

@Tshering22 @Kal Muah

@anant_s @pothead

@Sam Vaish @deep.ocean

@Ajaxpaul @Kinetic

@Omega007 @jetray

@Dash @WhyCry

 

[Sucha Kuggu]

Which resolution??? And have you read the original resolution from the UN site ??? I think not. Watch this

You cant find a single credible source to prove you false claim. Bellow are some credible sources about the status of Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK).

• United Nations Security Council Resolution 47
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Quoted from the above link...

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, adopted on April 21, 1948, concerns the resolution of the Kashmir conflict. When after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan, the Council increased the size of the Commission established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 39 to five members (with representatives of Argentina, Belgium, Columbia, Czechoslovakia and the United States[1]), instructed the Commission to go to the subcontinent and help the governments of India and Pakistan restore peace and order to the region and prepare for a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir.

Secondly, the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

 

[Stephen Cohen]

Just use the nukes already

Please do so ; why did nt you do it so far

 

[Sergi]

You cant find a single credible source to prove you false claim. Bellow are some credible sources about the status of Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK).

• United Nations Security Council Resolution 47
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Quoted from the above link...

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, adopted on April 21, 1948, concerns the resolution of the Kashmir conflict. When after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan, the Council increased the size of the Commission established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 39 to five members (with representatives of Argentina, Belgium, Columbia, Czechoslovakia and the United States[1]), instructed the Commission to go to the subcontinent and help the governments of India and Pakistan restore peace and order to the region and prepare for a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir.

Secondly, the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

Do you even read your own post ??? Wiki is credible source !!!!!!

In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir.

this is from your post. And your understanding of English language is good plz see the video. I am saying exactly what you are saying you are just understanding it your way.

Go to UN web and find the original resolution. All conditions are sequential and must.
http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/46-51/Chapter 8/46-51_08-16-The India-Pakistan question.pdf

This from UN side. Have fun reading

 

[Sucha Kuggu]

Do you even read your own post ??? Wiki is credible source !!!!!!
this is from your post. And your understanding of English language is good plz see the video. I am saying exactly what you are saying you are just understanding it your way.

Go to UN web and find the original resolution. All conditions are sequential and must.
http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/46-51/Chapter 8/46-51_08-16-The India-Pakistan question.pdf

This from UN side. Have fun reading

Did you even read the full reply before reacting to that. You missed the link of UN website and it was in English. Try once again its given below.
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

 

[kaykay]

You cant find a single credible source to prove you false claim. Bellow are some credible sources about the status of Indian Occupied Kashmir (IOK).

• United Nations Security Council Resolution 47
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_Resolution_47

Quoted from the above link...

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 47, adopted on April 21, 1948, concerns the resolution of the Kashmir conflict. When after hearing arguments from both India and Pakistan, the Council increased the size of the Commission established by United Nations Security Council Resolution 39 to five members (with representatives of Argentina, Belgium, Columbia, Czechoslovakia and the United States[1]), instructed the Commission to go to the subcontinent and help the governments of India and Pakistan restore peace and order to the region and prepare for a plebiscite to decide the fate of Kashmir.

Secondly, the Resolution recommended a three-step process for the resolution of the dispute. In the first step, Pakistan was asked to withdraw all its nationals from Kashmir. In the second step, India was asked to progressively reduce its forces to the minimum level required for law and order. In the third step, India was asked to appoint a plebiscite administrator nominated by the United Nations who would conduct a free and impartial plebiscite.

lolz from your own post, first step is, complete withdrawal of Pakistani citizens from Kashmir. Till that happens, India is not bound to do anything on it.

 

[Sergi]

Did you even read the full reply before reacting to that. You missed the link of UN website and it was in English. Try once again its given below.
http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/47(1948)

I know. You read what you post dear. I quoted the part of your post in that post. To put it in more simpler language plz read your post from the word "first thing". And that's a version of resolution not the actual one

http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire/46-51/Chapter 8/46-51_08-16-The India-Pakistan question.pdf
Here is ORIGINAL AND DETAILED resolution. Try to comprehend if you can

 

[Laozi]

lolz from your own post, first step is, complete withdrawal of Pakistani citizens from Kashmir. Till that happens, India is not bound to do anything on it.

In Pakistan occupied parts of Kashmir there are no Kashmiris nationals AS They all have de facto accepted themselves as Pakistanis

There are no freedom movement in that part of Kashmir.

So to comply with UN resolution, Does Pakistan need to vacate everyone from there ?