What's new

Pak-salvo missile to deter Indian-cold start doctrine

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Pak-salvo missile to deter Indian-cold start doctrine

Posted on 2013-11-07 04:54:27

NCFdj.jpg


Beenish Altaf

An outstanding with enhanced capability missile tested successfully today dated November 5, 2013. It was a Short Range Surface to Surface Missile named as Hatf IX (NASR) with a range of 60 kilometer. The test fire was conducted with successive launches of 4 x missiles (Salvo) from a state of the art multi tube launcher. Nasr with this in-flight maneuver capability is a quick response system equipped with shoot and scoot attributes.

Before analyzing Nasr it is imperative to recount here that nuclear deterrence is foisted upon Pakistan due to India’s aggressive nuclear weapon program. Coming to the point, India is pro-actively firing day by day a new test, just for instance going a few days back, Indian test-fired a nuclear-capable Prithvi-II missile with a strike range of 350 km. It was also a surface-to-surface missile that was test-fired from a mobile launcher in ‘Salvo Mode.

’ Giving that reason, Pakistan’s response in form of TNWs in or the other way, is necessary for restoring and then ultimately maintaining the credibility of its nuclear deterrence. The Chief of Army Staff, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, acknowledging the effort as an addition to Pakistan deterrence, congratulated the scientists and engineers on this outstanding achievement which consolidates Pakistan\'s deterrence capability.

The test being in a Salvo mode is an excellent effort to respond to India’s Cold Start Doctrine (CSD) and there ‘proactive operations which were introduced with the purpose of finding space for limited war, by achieving their objectives remaining below Pakistan nuclear threshold.’ The press release also explained regarding the test that it contributes to the full spectrum deterrence against threats in view of evolving scenarios.

Therefore Pakistan’s verdict of introducing these weapons in its nuclear force posture is very much intact with ‘Waltz argument that in an anarchical international system, states must rely on self-help mechanism for protecting its sovereignty and national security.’ Though for Pakistan the real nuclear threat festering in south Asia is Indian military expansion and buildup but pragmatically speaking, if India assumes that it could dominate the war through surgical strikes or its so-called CSD without crossing nuclear threshold then they need to correct themselves keeping the successful series of NASR tests.

It actually aimed to target the ‘advancing Indian Army armored columns’ or proactive Indian army operations inside the Pakistan borders. The cutting edge technology (Nasr) intends for large army concentration. Haft IX — shoot and scoot nuclear missile could be fired upon ‘area of operation of a Divisional or Corps level attack.’

Belligerently, former Indian Air Chief’s statement would be relevant to quote here that he made categorically; ‘such a nuclear attack even at this level would invite a massive response from India and though he did not name the cities but analysts presume that they might be Lahore and Karachi. Defence analysts had also surmised that Pakistan is at a distinct disadvantage of producing this weapon system which it cannot use in any war with its adversary but has spent billions of dollars on the same. Ironically, I believe it’s more a liability rather than a benefit. They won’t be used on either sides of border.

Lastly, since the game of thrones was initiated by Indian CSD, Pakistan needs to keep on test firing these upgraded missiles. Let’s wait and see how India will react; it could be that they would create a buffer zone might be plus 60 Km on border

The writer works as a Research Associate in the Strategic Vision Institute and can be contacted at beenish@thestrategicvision.com
 
. . .
The author failed to proofread the article and hence most of it appears to be gibberish.

The article starts with :

" An outstanding with enhanced capability missile tested successfully today dated November 5, 2013"

An outstanding what ?

The rest of the this article is filled by similar gibberish. Can no one in Pakistan write decent English with few or no grammatical errors ?
 
.
An outstanding with enhanced capability missile tested successfully today dated November 5, 2013. It was a Short Range Surface to Surface Missile named as Hatf IX (NASR) with a range of 60 kilometer. The test fire was conducted with successive launches of 4 x missiles (Salvo) from a state of the art multi tube launcher. Nasr with this in-flight maneuver capability is a quick response system equipped with shoot and scoot attributes.
I think SALVO because only 1 NASSR with 1-5kt yeild might not be enough for an IBG which will cover a large area and will not be in a single group, firing a SALVO will ensure widespread effect.
 
.
I had heard about a facility being developed in Pakistan with the capability of launching 80-82 ballistic missiles in a single GO.

was a rumour or true?anyone heard something similar
 
.
I had heard about a facility being developed in Pakistan with the capability of launching 80-82 ballistic missiles in a single GO.

was a rumour or true?anyone heard something similar
I don't think anybody will develop a facillity which houses 80 BMs so they can all be destroyed in a single strike by the enemy.
 
. .
We need to increase it range it should be double and more tubes and Pakistan should develop bomb like MOAB who are as destructive as nuke or almost but with no radiation thing
 
.
We need to increase it range it should be double and more tubes and Pakistan should develop bomb like MOAB who are as destructive as nuke or almost but with no radiation thing
Massive Ordnance Air Blast is just 11 Ton TNT and is delivered by a C 130, quite vunreable and slow
11 Ton of TnT is nothing, NASSR has a yeild from 1000 Ton of TNT to 5000 tons of TNT
and an airburst minimizes Residual radiation and local fallout ;)
 
Last edited:
.
I had heard about a facility being developed in Pakistan with the capability of launching 80-82 ballistic missiles in a single GO.

was a rumour or true?anyone heard something similar

Yeah somebody posted a thread like that, referring to the weapons storage facility at Kirana Hills, Sargodha. There are more than a 100 bunkers there but are used for storage of conventional weapons (ammunition etc).
The claim is obviously bollocks.
 
.
I think war is more about playing with the PSYCHOLOGY of an enemy than using actual weapons or doctrines.....

I think even by just ASSUMING that India has such doctrine like the COLD START, if Pak starts on buying weapons that in other cases it din't wanted than INDIA'S SO CALLED COLD START DOCTRINE HAS SERVED IT'S PURPOSE.
 
. .
Yeah somebody posted a thread like that, referring to the weapons storage facility at Kirana Hills, Sargodha. There are more than a 100 bunkers there but are used for storage of conventional weapons (ammunition etc).
The claim is obviously bollocks.

LOL, that was an EPIC thread. And the OP went on to say that not only it depicted Pakistan humongous nuke capability, but also great engineering skills to able to make so many holes in the ground in the hills--------which he said India cannot!

That was one of the singularly amusing threads that appeared here.
 
.
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom