What's new

Pak Amraams can be made ineffective: US assured Manohar Parrikar

PDFChamp

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Messages
489
Reaction score
6
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
Source: Indian media, who else

The assurances were made in 2015 when then defence minister Manohar Parrikar strongly raised the issue of supply of Amraams and fighter jets to Pakistan
ET Bureau|
Mar 21, 2019, 07.26 AM IST

New Delhi: The United States had assured India that Pakistan won’t use F16s and Amraams (advanced medium range air-to-air missiles) for offensive purposes as the US had an effective end-user monitoring process and the systems could be made ineffective if they were misused.

The assurances were made in 2015 when then defence minister Manohar Parrikar strongly raised the issue of supply of Amraams and fighter jets to Pakistan with his US counterpart Ashton Carter, top government sources told ET.

Sources who were part of the discussions between Parrikar and Carter in 2015 said two specific issues were raised in discussions that took place in New Delhi and Washington. “One of the issues was that the Amraams have a long range and they cannot be used against terrorists but would be targeted at us,” a three-star rank officer who was part of the discussions told ET.

Carter responded to this by assuring that the missiles will not be used against India and the US has a mechanism to make them ineffective if they are used during war. “If they use it for an offensive purpose, they can interfere with the mechanism and make them ineffective,” the officer, who was involved in the talks, told ET.

The second issue was the potential of misuse of F16s to deliver nuclear bombs against India. “An assurance was given that in case of a potential nuclear attack, the US can disable the aircraft. That, if they use nukes, they won’t be able to operate the F16s,” the officer said.

After efforts to get the US administration to ban the subsidised sale of eight of the advanced Block 52 version of F16s to Pakistan in 2015, India had lobbied at the US Senate against the deal. Sources said India was successful in convincing members of the US Senate that giving subsidies for the deal would not send the right message. The chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker, said in March 2016: “Prohibiting a taxpayer subsidy sends a message to Pakistan that it needs tochange its behaviour, but preventing the purchase of US aircraft would do more harm than good by paving the way for countries like Russia and China to sell to Pakistan while also inhibiting greater cooperation on counterterrorism.”
 
Article may be bull crap but the event history is a FACTS.
Mind it lately, i have seen Indians asking questions.
There is no way Americans can disable Amrams neither our F16s its all cooked up stories by Indian yes they can ban spare parts or further sale but current inventory is GOP property they can use it as Pentagon said for his protection.
 
if what is being said is true, then in effect, the iaf was able to defeat the amraam by the su30's self protection pods, the problem is that amraam went in search and seak out mode again and killed the mi17 instead. But what is even a BIGGER problem for the iaf is the SD10 which killed the mirage2k and the su30 that the amraam missed (mig21 was brought down by SRAAM)...now, india's sugar daddy uncle sam can't help india there...
 
1980 Soviet jets attacked Afghan refugee camps by bombing them. Pakistan the then partner of USA against Soviet occupation requested USA for F-16. USA provided Pakistan with F-16 to defend it's air space from Soviet and to attack Soviet jets over Afghan air space and I repeat again to attack Soviet jets over Afghan air space. So F-16 were when given against money were allowed to be used to attack other nations and they took down multiple jets in 80s. Any misconception Indians have please be advised stay away.
 

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom