What's new

OSINT India/Israel/UK 'targets' China, Pakistan, Iran & Turkey via Satellite Imagery illegal details

warheads can also get such thrusters to intercept maneuvering satellite just like sam warhead takes down fighter jet once fired by using radar and navigation within warhead and downing fighter jet is much difficult as compared to satellites which are less maneuverable,china and russia can also launch antisatellite weapons in short time as russian s500 mobile airdefense system can shoot down satellites so such capability is not limited to u.s only
You would need to get at least dozens of warheads into such missile to get them all at one time, which means the S500 would have to be the size of ICBMs. Have you seen how big they are right now? Currently the S-500 is only meant for 1 satellite.
maxresdefault.jpg
 
.
You see that is the point. For example in China- India face-off, How OSINT Satellite imagery Indian channels use to build a "narrative" play military psyops, whether its old imagery, faked up or concocted, but the Indian anchors rely onto as clear evidence and Gospel truth to assure the public.

Actually what had happened is Indian Army was caught napping by Chinese who captured 60 Km of Disputed Ladakh Indian side of territory.

Videos show, how images, OSINT make it look like India has stood up to Chinese:


 
.
Heavy OSINT used to make a point:


But OSINT never stopped Chinese to stop and plan its buildup under satellites, infact trucks and Humvees keep lining up to plan an attack.
 
.
Heavy OSINT used to make a point:


But OSINT never stopped Chinese to stop and plan its buildup under satellites, infact trucks and Humvees keep lining up to plan an attack.

Just embarrassing relying on this.
 
.
Just embarrassing relying on this.

What you make of this, or any member make of this, Satellite OSINT interpretation vs On ground reality, and Political talk on incursion:


What is reliable or not. Colonel has a crucial point opposing Satellite imagery (IMINT), that incursion has happened, and Chinese hold positions in Ladakh, when things are made PUBLIC.

Air interpretation does not give true picture as its not real time, one day, or few hours old, can be photo shopped, where as when on ground events who have been involved tell and faced, would tell truth. A crucial point made.

My Conclusion is : Satellite OSINT IMINT(imagery intelligence) as well as on ground/locals news will make a potent force to destroy others claims and narratives. But on ground local news is not all to be based as they can lie / make up stories on the event as well, whereas real time OSINT becomes useful, tells the impact points, GPS, & damage assessment or just intelligence gathering of airports, military and civil infrastructure locations. It is a counterbalance to see if one is lying and making up stories. Both Satellite OSINT IMINT made public as well as actual ground information complement each other, how intelligently and fairly one uses it, is the point of deep analysis on judgment. Truth will eventually come out, if you hold ground or not.
 
. . . . . .
This is hardly confidential information. You don't need a satellite to capture fighter jets parked under the open sky.
It’s open source garbage not even worth spending time discussing.

He is using commercial satellite imagery for pointless analysis,if IMINT was everything in itself, US won't need to send in Human Assets to the ground and risk their lives. If IMINT could save lives, eagle claw would have been successful.
If IMINT was everything than Indians would not have to face the huge embarrassment on Feb26 in Balakot
Realtime Imagery is something that gives you insight in planning operations which Indians & Pakistan both have access to. Pakistan also have partnership with access to Hi-Res Sat imagery in real time. No need to pay heed to such OSINT handles, they are just propagandists
This 1000%.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom