Well, I don't know what you mean by the "Muslim World". The Muslim World is very diverse and spans a few different continents. They're not united on much, including America. Some Muslim countries like the US, others dislike it. The US has different policies for each country.
As far as "bombing" Muslim countries go, the vast majority of those bombs were dropped on Iraq and Syria to fight ISIS. The rest (a small fraction) dropped on terrorists:
View attachment 374913
Surely, you don't support these elements. They harm Muslim countries, not help.
Indeed.
No, he did not become unpopular due to the protests. He's always been unpopular:
View attachment 374924
He did not receive the most votes on election day, Hillary Clinton did. He did win the electoral college, and therefore, the Presidency. But it is incorrect to say that he was supported by most Americans. He was not:
Hillary received 65,844,954 votes
(48%) to Trump's 62,979,879 votes
(46%).
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president
My point was only that the CIA is not going to get involved in politics. As for Trump, he will either be defeated or reelected in four years. His reelection chances don't look good right now, assuming the Democrats nominate a good candidate.
Sir, with all due respect, there is no "war on Islam". To suggest so is absurd, most Muslim countries have not seen any military incursion by the US. I have no idea what would be gained in such a war. Unless you consider a war on ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko-Haram, and the Taliban as a "war on Islam". I certainly hope you don't.
As I said, Trump speaks only for himself and his administration. The actions of other Presidents and their administrations speak for themselves, not Trump. You may disagree with some US policies, and that's fine. No two countries will agree on everything. And ultimately, every country in the world is looking out for its own interests. However, not everything the US does in the world is controversial. It contributes many positive things to the world as well.
Well, ISIS is later production than first attack of Iraq for WMD's which were not there.... Read Blair confession and Bush accompanying him... However, I was referring such points to explain the post. Today's terrorists in Afghanistan were actually blue eyed boys for US yesterday (Read USSR defeat in Afghanistan here). The discussion may divert the topic so not going further than this. In short, actually, policies w.r.t. fighting the terrorism are only defined as either to say Radical Islam, to fight ISIS, Al-Qaeda etc but all in all, it is always Islam the terrorist and other shooters are either spoiled childhood, mentally ill, due to depression and divorce, student had a fight at home shot mates in school/college so am saying that it is up-to the policy of one how it defines the terrorism of self and others while on other hand, how explains the need of war for itself yet want others not to defend but be banned from travel. These Seven countries are not terrorists and there are many terrorists in US as well that burnt Masjids, killed many innocents etc and also, if you are aware of the ISIS much, you may be aware that where the most fighters came from..... ISIS came into being like yesterday but the history of dropping bombs goes further back then.... However, I don't want to play blame game here but only stated what Trump is actually doing today is like doing openly yet previous Governments were doing the same thing but with a lot diplomacy and secretly that many leaders were part of the scheme.
If electoral college votes him and not public then what good use of such college vote is, which actually does not present People but a different mandate or in other words, it actually represents USA and not necessarily to be people. He banned several countries entry into US, a Judge suspended the same and maintained status quo of previous policy and this Guy started to badmouth the Judge and even presumed that bad people/terrorists would enter US due to such Court Verdict.
However, he is today's US president and the way he is threatening EU, Muslim Countries, China etc then seems like he has no agenda but being a businessman, he is pursuing the dream of himself as well as his sponsors to the Presidency.
True that CIA is not going to do such thing openly at all but there are ways and could be applied here for the best of the public interest against a person who is becoming a threat to US itself being President or being opposite to the US Policy.
The irony is, every terrorist is found to be Muslim in the end and almost every Muslim Country is under influence of US due to the same and true that, Muslim leaders are responsible for such situation and when West questions such people as they are responsible for the day and such leaders, IMO, same need to be applied for US as well as Trump is true representation of people of US and US Policies. The same way that Muslims are mostly branded as Radical Islamists and other brands, which is a sole purpose to wage a war and nothing else and Yes, I have no sympathy with ISIS etc at all that causes more damage to Islam than anyone else. Look what TTP has done in Pakistan and I ma sure that you will be aware of our sacrifices (From Civilians to Military) in this war against terrorism. But the way most Islamic Countries are invaded or either manipulated to push them on brink of war, is totally injustice and not the fight against Terrorism at whole. Read Iraq before US Attack and there is no threat of ISIS etc but speculated WMD's that too proven fake but world was introduced with cancer like ISIS after that war. Look at Afghanistan after USSR defeat, the same US Beloved Taliban were ruling the country but what, 9/11 and attack on Afghanistan that introduced the rest of the world with hundreds of 9/11s even in Muslim Countries that sided US in war against Terrorism. Look at Syria, if US couldn't clean it or has to support one factions, shouldn't have entered at all to leave them like this or on the mercy of terrorists from both end like ISIS at one and ASSAD at other hand. I am actually searching for the video that US Defence Committee grilled US General over Syria issue and clearly stated that actually US handed over Syria to Russia in platter as well as betrayed the people that believed in US (during Obama last year I think). So, there are reasons for the hate against US in Islamic Countries and does hold a weight too that one cannot discard the same by saying lies only.
Trump's current presidency style is actually good enough to punish US for all such that EU is pushing away, people in Islamic world are actually opposing US more than before. Yes, the same Islamic world that is left even after all those bombings, manipulation, greed of leaders for the West/US and the love of money being deliberately exploited and there are unseen forces that Langley office knows best. Direct US Military incursion is not the WAR alone but there are different means/types & ways to do so like in the name of war against Terrorism, economic war, civil unrest, sanctions that pushes country towards rebellion, hosting the rebels and traitors of those countries yet securing black money and business of those leaders for own benefits and supporting the corrupt lot of all times to govern the people.
You are right that every President is actually responsible for his own actions and policies that he carried along and indeed, there are good done by US in the world as well that I don't deny however, a President actually represents the Country's policy and people. However, if this guy continued, we may see the spark of war way before it is expected and on other hand, his current statements and all actually helping us to spank our US Loving Leaders that most are corrupt to core and have stored looted money abroad. Hopefully, Trump will help us by unveiling them openly and telling their real crimes to the world even if due to grudge of Muslim country or whatsoever, but still would help us a lot and I wouldn't mind him doing so. On other hand, if he continues to hide our leaders crimes, US will be hated same as before because friend to the leaders but not the public that very few are aware about them.
I am merely stating how I see Trump and US today that I may be wrong at some points but not at all.