A.Muqeet khan
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2010
- Messages
- 981
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
President Obama’s formal request Wednesday for authority to use military force against the Islamic State set the stage for the first broad congressional debate over the administration’s strategy in Syria and Iraq.
Looking toward what could be months of hearings and significant changes in White House language before a final vote, Republicans seeking a broader authority, and Democrats hoping to narrow the President’s war options, staked out widely divergent positions.
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Obama is also “going to have to go out and make his case to the American people. The delivery of this authorization is the beginning of a legislative process.”
The requested Authorization for the Use of Military Force, or AUMF, would permit ongoing airstrikes and U.S. military training for local ground forces in Iraq and Syria for the next three years, while prohibiting “enduring offensive ground combat operations.” It includes no geographic limitations on a possible extension of the war beyond those two countries in pursuit of the Islamic State and “associated persons or forces.”
“It is not the authorization of another ground war, like Afghanistan or Iraq,” Obama said in a White House appearance. But he said it would give him “the flexibility we need for unforeseen circumstances,” including ground deployment of Special Operations forces for rescue missions and unspecified assistance to local forces.
Participating countries in the global coalition against the Islamic State
More than 60 partners of the United States have committed support to “degrade and defeat” the militant group. The coalition includes two intergovernmental bodies — the European Union and the Arab League.
Many Democrats called that restriction too vague. “It’s a very broad grant of authority . . . that leaves wide open the possibility of real engagement of U.S. combat forces on the ground in Iraq and Syria,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).
Others said the authority did not go far enough. “The president must articulate and implement a comprehensive strategy that gives our military experts and commanders the agility and authority they need to successfully confront this increasingly dangerous and complex threat,” said Rep. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio). “Today’s request by the president does not meet that criteria.”
Senior Republicans, including Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain (Ariz.), whose committee will consider the bill, have said that ground forces might be needed and that nothing should be ruled out in confronting the dire threat posed by the Islamic State. In a statement late Wednesday, McCain expressed “deep concerns” about what he called Obama’s “narrow definition of strategy” and called the proposal a “recipe for failure.”
McCain and Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) met with GOP senators Wednesday to discuss next steps.
Obama, flanked at a White House appearance by Vice President Biden and the secretaries of state and defense, said his strategy of using U.S. and coalition airstrikes against the militants, and bolstering local ground forces to push them back, was succeeding.
“This is a difficult mission, and it will remain difficult for some time,” he said. “But our coalition is on the offensive, ISIL is on the defensive, and ISIL is going to lose.” ISIL is an acronym for the Islamic State.
continue reading on :Obama makes formal request for war authorization against Islamic State | opinion maker
Looking toward what could be months of hearings and significant changes in White House language before a final vote, Republicans seeking a broader authority, and Democrats hoping to narrow the President’s war options, staked out widely divergent positions.
House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) said Obama is also “going to have to go out and make his case to the American people. The delivery of this authorization is the beginning of a legislative process.”
The requested Authorization for the Use of Military Force, or AUMF, would permit ongoing airstrikes and U.S. military training for local ground forces in Iraq and Syria for the next three years, while prohibiting “enduring offensive ground combat operations.” It includes no geographic limitations on a possible extension of the war beyond those two countries in pursuit of the Islamic State and “associated persons or forces.”
“It is not the authorization of another ground war, like Afghanistan or Iraq,” Obama said in a White House appearance. But he said it would give him “the flexibility we need for unforeseen circumstances,” including ground deployment of Special Operations forces for rescue missions and unspecified assistance to local forces.
Participating countries in the global coalition against the Islamic State
More than 60 partners of the United States have committed support to “degrade and defeat” the militant group. The coalition includes two intergovernmental bodies — the European Union and the Arab League.
Many Democrats called that restriction too vague. “It’s a very broad grant of authority . . . that leaves wide open the possibility of real engagement of U.S. combat forces on the ground in Iraq and Syria,” said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.).
Others said the authority did not go far enough. “The president must articulate and implement a comprehensive strategy that gives our military experts and commanders the agility and authority they need to successfully confront this increasingly dangerous and complex threat,” said Rep. Michael R. Turner (R-Ohio). “Today’s request by the president does not meet that criteria.”
Senior Republicans, including Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain (Ariz.), whose committee will consider the bill, have said that ground forces might be needed and that nothing should be ruled out in confronting the dire threat posed by the Islamic State. In a statement late Wednesday, McCain expressed “deep concerns” about what he called Obama’s “narrow definition of strategy” and called the proposal a “recipe for failure.”
McCain and Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) met with GOP senators Wednesday to discuss next steps.
Obama, flanked at a White House appearance by Vice President Biden and the secretaries of state and defense, said his strategy of using U.S. and coalition airstrikes against the militants, and bolstering local ground forces to push them back, was succeeding.
“This is a difficult mission, and it will remain difficult for some time,” he said. “But our coalition is on the offensive, ISIL is on the defensive, and ISIL is going to lose.” ISIL is an acronym for the Islamic State.
continue reading on :Obama makes formal request for war authorization against Islamic State | opinion maker