Jungibaaz
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2010
- Messages
- 8,756
- Reaction score
- 113
- Country
- Location
The thing is when the PM wants and says the same thing, there is no need. The governemnt and armed forces thinking process is the same, we have never seen such synergy before ( because for the first time our civil government is not being influenced from outside and can resist pressure) Thats why i say i feel very confident the way Afghanistan is being handled. US is finding a scapegoat, and demanding all sorts of ridiculous things,
1) Airbase
2) Open border for refugees and the latest
3) Take action against Taliban.
We have roped in China and Russia, and are resisting and will continue resisting these ridiculous demands.
There's no doubt that we are being scapegoated, whether that's Ghani's crying, or India's scheming, or the US' convenient denialism. Up to this point, I agree with all of you. But I am of the opinion that finding a way forward with the US is of paramount importance.
Currently, the tone we have adopted as a rebuttal against the US is this: "you left without consulting us, and left without a settlement, now the Taliban are in ascendency, it's no wonder we're not able to restrain them. You could have waited, took us in confidence, and had some semblance of an understanding with the Taliban before you left - and you failed to convince Ghani. Please, whatever you do going forward, keep us involved and in the loop."
Our national position is correct, but we still face criticism, accusations, bad relations with global powers, and possibly (God forbid) sanctions, if the Taliban takes over.
This is what the security establishment is busy on one hand trying to avoid by talking to the US, and on the other hand preparing for internally. And it is as I said, Moeed Yusuf talking with the US, not our FM. IK's comments are secondary.