North-South Indian divide & idea of "DravidaNadu"

[Arulmozhi Varman]

It's Nadu and not Naidu which is a caste name. First understand the word terminologies and then post useless threads.

 

[Moriro]

I opted for no as my opnion is that division among north and south won't change their preception for muslims or Pakistan as 71 years of propaganda and haterd fed to them is now flowing in their viens

 

[Laozi]

Hindi is forced on Tamil and other poor South Indians.

You got your facts wrong. Hardly anybody speaks Hindi in South.

You cannot create artificial states.

Yes you can at least try. Isn't Urdu is forced on every Pakistani state. Does anybody learn Punjabi language in your side of Punjab. Or Is Kashmiri taught in your side of Kashmir.

You are trying very hard to unite Pakistan through Urdu. Whether it will be artificial only time will tell.

 

[Moriro]

I opted for no as my opnion is that division among north and south won't change their preception for muslims or Pakistan as 71 years of propaganda and haterd fed to them is now flowing in their viens, and an independent south is economically is more dangerious then the united with north as they have to share with resources with least capable northern states.

 

[Raghav_101]

My south Indian friends believe if South India was a separate country it would already be a developed country and would be atleast around the levels of middle income countries. I don't think they are far off the mark.

Oh so now they are friends. Usually on this forum they have to face Racist comments too apart from usual slurs thrown to Hindus and Indians in general.

 

[waz]

Exactly. Many of my friends say Baloch will separate, I say they won't. People always argue on the basis of economics and ignore emotions and think they are intellectuals. Balochistan alone won't separate from Pakistan, if many states separate from Pakistan Balochistan will follow but never alone.

Yes indeed, people tend to live in cloud cuckoo land.

 

[rishav]

Pakistani trolls who know nothing about south indian and the similarity as well as diversity among southern states talking about how it wants to separate from India !

 

[Raghav_101]

I didn't knew that until few people from South India told me this in US. They are proud of their language,history and culture which is different from artificial hindi republic. The best way is South India become a United States of Dravid Nadu, they will be developed country if not like Europe then definetly better than countries like South Korea, Thailand, Taiwan or Indonesia. North India is pulling them backwards. Sooner or later north will have even more seats and population bomb, while south population will decrease and give opportunity to north bimaru states to occupy south Indian land and even marry their women.

Going by your logic, Karachi should be a city state like Singapore then. I have seen so many threads here about how Karachi alone pays much more tax than any state. So when are you suggesting your ideas to Karachites ??

 

[Jackdaws]

Indus is exclusively in Pakistan. Get your facts right.

Indus starts near the Indo-Chinese border. After that whether it flows into Pakistan or Bangladesh is not our concern. We are the upper riparian of the Indus.

 

[Raghav_101]

I am Tamil myself and very few Tamils will behave like this. Most Tamils will just tell you they don't know hindi and try to help you with English.

Don't bother with him. False flagger.

 

[TheGreatMaratha]

Shortly after India became free, the last British commander in chief of the Indian Army, Gen. Claude Auchinleck, wrote: “The Sikhs may try to set up a separate regime. I think they probably will and that will be only a start of a general decentralization and break-up of the idea that India is a country, whereas it is a subcontinent as varied as Europe. The Punjabi is as different from a Madrassi as a Scot is from an Italian. The British tried to consolidate it but achieved nothing permanent. No one can make a nation out of a continent of many nations.”

Another former British official who was in India during the first general elections of 1952 wrote home that “a future and more enlightened age will view with astonishment the absurd farce of recording the votes of millions of illiterate people.”

Speaking in Cambridge in 1880, a high official of the British Raj named Sir John Strachey said that the “first and most essential thing to learn about India” is that “there is not, and there never was an India”. Strachey thought it “conceivable that national sympathies may arise in particular Indian countries”, but “that they should ever extend to India generally, that men of the Punjab, Bengal, the Northwestern Provinces, and Madras, should ever feel that they belong to one Indian nation, is impossible”.

"When Nehru goes," wrote Aldous Huxley, "the government will become a military dictatorship - as in so many of the newly independent states, for the army seems to be the only highly organised centre of power."

The Times of London ran a series of articles entitled "India's disintegrating democracy". The paper's Delhi correspondent, Neville Max well, was certain that "the great experiment of developing India within a democratic framework has failed". Indians, he told his readers, would soon vote in the "fourth - and surely last - general election".



Proud to see India united!

 

[Raghav_101]

Hindi is forced on Tamil and other poor South Indians.

You won't even get job in many companies in Northern India if you don't know hindi and are south indian, but you will do absolutely fine with knowing English and hindi if you are north Indian and will get a job in south india.



You cannot create artificial states. Just like Europe Union is an artificial state so is india. Look how British quit EU because they were smart enough to realize that UK was feeding others. Now EU states are milking Germany. Similarly South India is getting milked and North India Bimarus are getting feeded by South India'S hard earned money. India is artificial British creation to contain China.

Only if you ever visited Delhi you will know.

Vajiram and Ravi , the Mecca of IAS preparation in India is in Delhi, run by a South Indian and most of the staff is from South. Knowing hindi is never an issue unless your job demands dealing with local population, which is an issue everywhere

 

[American Pakistani]

I already said boss! As per the Pakistani text book, you are right but request to have look at international sources. Thank you..

You are either quoting Bharti propaganda sources or western sources whose actual source is a bharti.

 

[Raghav_101]

Shortly after India became free, the last British commander in chief of the Indian Army, Gen. Claude Auchinleck, wrote: “The Sikhs may try to set up a separate regime. I think they probably will and that will be only a start of a general decentralization and break-up of the idea that India is a country, whereas it is a subcontinent as varied as Europe. The Punjabi is as different from a Madrassi as a Scot is from an Italian. The British tried to consolidate it but achieved nothing permanent. No one can make a nation out of a continent of many nations.”

Another former British official who was in India during the first general elections of 1952 wrote home that “a future and more enlightened age will view with astonishment the absurd farce of recording the votes of millions of illiterate people.”

Speaking in Cambridge in 1880, a high official of the British Raj named Sir John Strachey said that the “first and most essential thing to learn about India” is that “there is not, and there never was an India”. Strachey thought it “conceivable that national sympathies may arise in particular Indian countries”, but “that they should ever extend to India generally, that men of the Punjab, Bengal, the Northwestern Provinces, and Madras, should ever feel that they belong to one Indian nation, is impossible”.

"When Nehru goes," wrote Aldous Huxley, "the government will become a military dictatorship - as in so many of the newly independent states, for the army seems to be the only highly organised centre of power."

The Times of London ran a series of articles entitled "India's disintegrating democracy". The paper's Delhi correspondent, Neville Max well, was certain that "the great experiment of developing India within a democratic framework has failed". Indians, he told his readers, would soon vote in the "fourth - and surely last - general election".



Proud to see India united!

I was posted in Nasik for 2 years as a Defence Civilian. I had colleagues from numerous states north south east west. No body had any issue against Idea of India. No body. It's amazing to see people so different in various aspects of their lives are still proud citizens of India.

 

[American Pakistani]

You obviously don't know much about EU or India. EU is not a state but only a monetary union and today they are under far less pressure than during the global financial crisis in 2008 and the Euro took a hammering. India is an ancient civilization like China and will always be one country. 1947 was a defining moment when it could have been multiple countries and the British badly wanted that but it weren't to be. It is the will of the people to be together. I won't speak further because that ll get me banned.

You are wrong. You are so brainwashed that you don't even acknowledge the fact that the name india itself came from my province of Sindh. Even your religion came from the same province so is your culture. You dance on the civilization which was primarily in modern day Pakistan, be it Gandhara, Harrappa, MahenJoDaro, MehrGarh, Taxila or any other. Keep getting brainwashed by north indians, instead of feeling proud about your own culture and promotion of Dravidianism. In fact you are forced by north Indians to follow a foreign culture, civilization and religion like a zombie.