What's new

No 'Hu' and cry over Chinese Prez visit, US prefers India

Veeru

BANNED
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
2,609
Reaction score
0
No 'Hu' and cry over Chinese Prez visit, US prefers India

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh got a state dinner when he came here in 2009 as President Barack Obama's first state guest. Chinese President Hu Jintao is getting one too, but commentators are discussing it as if it was completely unexpected. This and other comparisons are being drawn between India related stories and China in a triangular relationship with the US, going right up to the White House itself, unsolicited and unprompted.

Shortly before Hu arrived on Tuesday, Obama's press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters not to expect deliverables to match those of the India visit.

Even the think tanks seem a little under-enthused. Though papers are being presented and talks are being hosted, the buzz is missing. "The bottom line is that no one expects dramatic breakthroughs with the Hu visit," said Richard Fontaine of the Centre for New American Security. Though corporate deals worth billions are expected to be announced over the next two days, the high-voltage success of Obama's visit to India in November might have raised the bar for visits of this kind.

When asked about the dinner for Hu, and Obama's policy on state dinners, the White House spokesman brought up India once again: "India enjoys a very personal relationship with the United States."


And a state dinner is not something every visiting foreign leader gets as a matter of right. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, for example, who was here earlier this month didn't get a state dinner.

Former US President George W Bush hosted state dinners only for the closest allies of his nation. He didn't host one for Hu when he was here in 2006.

But comparisons are still being made.

National security advisor Tom Donilon was asked at a White House briefing about the apparent absence of "staff work" that preceded the India visit, which the reporter said "was really a summit".

"It just had a different strategic dynamic to it," Donilon said, adding, "We fully embraced India's rise as a great power and a great partner for the United States."


No 'Hu' and cry over Chinese Prez visit, US prefers India - Hindustan Times
 
. .
Lets wait for an international source for verifying the same.
AFAIK Obama's visit to India and Manmohan's visit to US was a did receive a lot of "Hu" and Cry in the Indian media but hardly made any impact on it's western counterparts.
 
.
I am sorry but 95% of the articles related to Indias' state visit were done by Indian media with the notion that "the 900lbs gorilla in the room" meaning china was ever present. With Obama prasing India and massaging India's ego.

China's visit was all business and India was probably on nobody's mind. With topic like the economy, N korea and Iran...real issue that the US cares deeply about. 99% of the article is written by western journalist.


if you read books on china written by americans...which there are many. the american educated and religious elite had always look to "mold" china into a clone of America.

when china fell to the communist... that was the political debacle for the US during this time. the chinese wont like the notion of Americans "molding" their culture but this is exactly what they are trying to do with china by pushing "universal human rights"

the day china become democratized(if ever) you will see Christian flood in there to convert. I had jehovah witnesses, Catholics, mormons tell me that the biggest "prize" is China. It seem like most chinese peeps already have christian Judea names like david, mathew.... so the molding already happening.

chinese have a bad rep right now with the Hollywood crowd mainly because of tibet and china wont let them control china's movies industry. Hollywood and US news media bash china daily, people complain about chinese cheap products... at the end of the day with all that bashing... americans still buy $300 billion worth of "cheap crap" from china.


India should stop romanticizing an "alliance" with the US like the sino-US "alliance" that brought down the soviets. The US will never isolate China allying with India and it would be probably be impossible to do. Japan for the past decades saw how American getting "closer" to china and leaving Japan out of the equation, Japan got smart because they could see how the US was following the money...hence Japan itself started making their policy more sino-centric. Toyota and most Japanese companies were late in the game into China, now they are behind Germans and US automakers. India would be best serve to follow the money, most of is in America at the moment, but you dont have to be a genuis to see who bank account is quickly adding up.
 
. . . .
No 'Hu' and cry over Chinese Prez visit, US prefers India

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh got a state dinner when he came here in 2009 as President Barack Obama's first state guest. Chinese President Hu Jintao is getting one too, but commentators are discussing it as if it was completely unexpected. This and other comparisons are being drawn between India related stories and China in a triangular relationship with the US, going right up to the White House itself, unsolicited and unprompted.

Shortly before Hu arrived on Tuesday, Obama's press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters not to expect deliverables to match those of the India visit.

Even the think tanks seem a little under-enthused. Though papers are being presented and talks are being hosted, the buzz is missing. "The bottom line is that no one expects dramatic breakthroughs with the Hu visit," said Richard Fontaine of the Centre for New American Security. Though corporate deals worth billions are expected to be announced over the next two days, the high-voltage success of Obama's visit to India in November might have raised the bar for visits of this kind.

When asked about the dinner for Hu, and Obama's policy on state dinners, the White House spokesman brought up India once again: "India enjoys a very personal relationship with the United States."


And a state dinner is not something every visiting foreign leader gets as a matter of right. French President Nicolas Sarkozy, for example, who was here earlier this month didn't get a state dinner.

Former US President George W Bush hosted state dinners only for the closest allies of his nation. He didn't host one for Hu when he was here in 2006.

But comparisons are still being made.

National security advisor Tom Donilon was asked at a White House briefing about the apparent absence of "staff work" that preceded the India visit, which the reporter said "was really a summit".

"It just had a different strategic dynamic to it," Donilon said, adding, "We fully embraced India's rise as a great power and a great partner for the United States."


No 'Hu' and cry over Chinese Prez visit, US prefers India - Hindustan Times


There is lot of difference between China who talks on equal level and India who talk for support & help, so there is no comparison between China & India. Take rest.
 
. .
State dinner or not it doesn't matter! Chian's 'THE' next big thing, whether america likes it or not. They've just gotta accept the fact.
And india shouldn't trust these americans blindly.
 
. .
the author seems to mirror the insecurities of many :)

by the way, it's a no-brainer. China's influence and economic/mil might is growing substantially. They own a huge chunk of american debt. They view eachother suspiciously but need eachother. Classic symbiotic relationship.

US just needs india to keep a check on China, though I'm unsure how effective it will be considering the Chinese are now in every corner of the world --even conflict zones Iraq & Afghanistan.

in fact, they will soon be bigger donors than US/EU and the financial development institutions operating within....it's also a cultural thing. Chinese tend to look 100 years ahead, rather than 5-10 years (or 1 day, if you are a Pakistani politician). They are securing volume of contracts, and of course that means they have increased influence.

so of course it's natural that US ''prefers india''.......the worlds ''largest democracy''
 
. .
very informative article...

Shortly before Hu arrived on Tuesday, Obama's press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters not to expect deliverables to match those of the India visit.

When asked about the dinner for Hu, and Obama's policy on state dinners, the White House spokesman brought up India once again: "India enjoys a very personal relationship with the United States."
National security advisor Tom Donilon was asked at a White House briefing about the apparent absence of "staff work" that preceded the India visit, which the reporter said "was really a summit".

"It just had a different strategic dynamic to it," Donilon said, adding, "We fully embraced India's rise as a great power and a great partner for the United States."



this is not just an article but statements of policies..

US-India relations are moving in right direction and will be turning stone in coming years to decide world policies..
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom