What's new

No change in Kashmir policy, says US

.
I agree that India is not going to give up Kashmir either. And for mutual peace it's important that waters keep flowing to Pakistan. However, when an enemy is at the next door, he will not be happy with your economic growth. Good economy can come down the ground when a nation has to fight a long and complex war. The war is always there in the north and east of India which will suck any 'good economy' you know. Weapons of mass destruction are with all the rivals. You will destroy one asset in the East, we will destroy 10 in the West. Then who will be more at loss? The one who had a very good economy or the one with a small and modest economy. You have a Mercedes, I have a Suzuki, both collide with each other for destruction; who loses more money?

You know Pakistan and China are working to show their active presence in the Indian Ocean; in case of war they are going to block fuel supply to India. Then what will run your economy?

Have you heard of 'string of pearls'?

In case of an India Pakistan war, China is not going to involve actively. That would essentially drag the Americans into the region. String of pearls is merely a gimmick created by Indian media.
 
.
yeh tou lolwa ho gawa :lol:

جیجا جی نے بیک پہ لات مار دی۔

In case of an India Pakistan war, China is not going to involve actively. That would essentially drag the Americans into the region. String of pearls is merely a gimmick created by Indian media.

And we are not going to pull India into a war unless China is not involved.
 
.
They will play shia sunni, we will play 4 castes of Hinduism; what a big deal :D

And it will work because dalit and brahmin is relation between oppressor and oppressed. Shia Sunni are like brothers having disputes in home.

Baniya did same in Khalistan, they pitched mazhabhi sikhs who are chura/chamars against Khalistani sikhs. But only difference between Kashmiri shia and sunni is some difference of opinion.
 
.
جیجا جی نے بیک پہ لات مار دی۔



And we are not going to pull India into a war unless China is not involved.
Thank you. That would be a very rational decision if true :-)
 
.
Thank you. That would be a very rational decision if true :-)

However seeing the American partnership with India to contain China, the PRC is likely to get involved in a conflict, and Pakistan should avail from it.

The price of Pakistani 'cooperation' with China for access to warm waters must be Kashmir.
 
.
However seeing the American partnership with India to contain China, the PRC is likely to get involved in a conflict, and Pakistan should avail from it.
Highly unlikely, my friend. Two super powers would never face each other. Money talks.
 
.
Once China gets used to Gawadar and the easy money flowing to Beijing, Pakistan must raise the price to Kashmir.

Highly unlikely, my friend. Two super powers would never face each other. Money talks.

In case of India, China is not going to face the US. You know America didn't face the USSR when it invaded Vietnam and USSR didn't fight USA when it invaded Afghanistan.
 
.
Once China gets used to Gawadar and the easy money flowing to Beijing, Pakistan must raise the price to Kashmir.



In case of India, China is not going to face the US. You know America didn't face the USSR when it invaded Vietnam and USSR didn't fight USA when it invaded Afghanistan.


YOU SOUND DESPERATE TO INVOLVE CHINA in a war with INDIA

You have realised trying to fight india you will lose swathes of more territory.

So you going to ask CHINA to help you ,,,,,, now USA has turned to INDIA.#

Good luck with that ......... since china CANT EVEN GET Taiwan.

NOBODY will lift a finger to FIGHT india for pakistam.#
#
not china
not Saudi
not USA
not turkey

THAT much history has shown us already
 
.
@modi The "hug" and chiggy wiggy time is over. While hindus can bow down to trump, the state policy remains. State policy does not change even if an orange is sitting on the bigger chair.


**In the above post no harm was done to fruits**
 
. .
YOU SOUND DESPERATE TO INVOLVE CHINA in a war with INDIA

You have realised trying to fight india you will lose swathes of more territory.

So you going to ask CHINA to help you ,,,,,, now USA has turned to INDIA.#

Good luck with that ......... since china CANT EVEN GET Taiwan.

NOBODY will lift a finger to FIGHT india for pakistam.#
#
not china
not Saudi
not USA
not turkey

THAT much history has shown us already

Well, we have experience of breaking the USSR into 25 pieces with the help of USA.

With the help of China we will break India into 50 pieces.

I hope you haven't forgotten Kargil yet. Earlier we fought wars with India when there was a military imbalance. Now you know we can keep messing with you.
 
.
India Need to buy F-11 Assembly line too, and some 50 more Drones haha :rofl:
 
.
Well, we have experience of breaking the USSR into 25 pieces with the help of USA.

With the help of China we will break India into 50 pieces.

I hope you haven't forgotten Kargil yet. Earlier we fought wars with India when there was a military imbalance. Now you know we can keep messing with you.


The last full war you lost east Pakistan
And it took just one week.

I suggest you leave the bravado at home

Kargil and saichrn and the water is in jndian hands
 
.
The last full war you lost east Pakistan
And it took just one week.

I suggest you leave the bravado at home

Kargil and saichrn and the water is in jndian hands

yeah during civil war, great achivement. In Kargil and 2002 your bhangies didnt even dare to cross border.. Still point 5353 the highest point of Kargilsector is in papa's hand. Your national highway still on mercy of Pak army..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom