What's new

New Epic Fail of Russian S300 Missile

Machines are bound to fail and than those problems are fixed and retested .. that is how Technology evolve. S-300 is very respectable Defense System ..

It's not the point !!!

A Saudi mocking Russian industrial capabilities :unsure:

Funny as hell ...

They are not able to build a screw by themselves ... Then talking about epic failure !!!

Keyboard warriors are awesome in trolling but when it comes to logic the failure happens !
 
Last edited:
.
^^^^

Don't border with reason and logic with that camel, hes just butthurt over Aleppo :lol:
A camelidae urine aficianado whose country spent over $90B in arms for an army made up of dimwitted dopes, writing an opinion on a one of the unequaled air defence system in this world. We have seen it all...

funny-gif-rocket-launch-fail.gif
:omghaha:
 
.
It's not a point !!!

Keyboard warriors are awesome in trolling but when it comes to logic the failure happens !

Yeah Iranian keyboard warriors, you people are the ones who said even your untested junky Bavar-373 is more capable and better than S300, then you wanted me to believe that the junk S300 is an impressive system. LOL
Iranian keyboard warriors have certainly schizophrenia because they're mocking S300 in Bavar-373 thread, but defending it here.
 
. .
It's not a point !!!

A Saudi mocking Russian industrial capabilities :unsure:

Funny as hell ...

They are not able to build a screw by themselves ... Then talking about epic failure !!!

Keyboard warriors are awesome in trolling but when it comes to logic the failure happens !

well i don't want comment on what KSA can build and what not .. but they are surely nowhere near Russia when comes to building everything .. and there is nothing bad in that , when it comes Defense System no one can beat Americans, than Russians comes second later comes NATO and China ..
but for the Topic it is stupid to make fun of a System based on few Failures , cause almost every System , Aircraft , missile or technology failed and retested that is how you make a perfect Product ..
 
. .
What if Iran placed that one junk weapon and the only battery Iran has next to an important place, then it failed like it certainly would because it has never been tested in the battlefield, what would you do then? LOL

I hope you compared Patriot to this junk weapon S300, you were comparing apple to orange.


All those patriots have not helped the Saudis in Yemen where scuds continue to hit Saudi military baracks. But that should be the least of your worries after losing like 400 pieces of heavy military equipment in Yemen. The Saudis should focus on recruiting people other then camel jockies that might help.

Oh, yea and remind everyone what Saudi Arabia produces. Sand does not count.

The NATO just wanted to make sure the S300 is a junk system and I think they are certain about that right now LOL

Another epic fail of the most fear air-defense system on earth, the magical S U-turn 300


Is there any evidence of S300 success in battlefield?




Russian SAM systems have downed thousands of aircraft. Most US military loses in Vietnam was due to SAMs. The Israeli have also lost a lot of aircraft due to SAMs.
 
. .
"saudi" Arabia should immediately launch a full offensive on Russian air bases in Syria, do it quick, save your rebels.
 
.
patriot it's a piece of sh*t compared to the s3/400
Nonsense.

PAC-2 and PAC-3 are battle-tested (and proven) ABM systems unlike the S-300.

Have you ever gaven a thought to why Israel preferred their own system than the patriot, even offered free to them?
That doesn't suggests lack of confidence in American systems. Israel has its own defense industry to cater to.
 
.
There is a reason why the s300/400 are feared all over, the Russians managed to shoot down a f117 stealth plane with a missile considered ancient at the time.
Just imagine what these modern missiles can do.
 
.
Nonsense.

PAC-2 and PAC-3 are battle-tested (and proven) ABM systems unlike the S-300.


That doesn't suggests lack of confidence in American systems. Israel has its own defense industry to cater to.
battle-tested (and proven) against what?
patriot is good only against airplanes,against BM it's useless
 
. .
Malfunctions happen, it's machines' nature... Self-destruction is also a good feature which Russia can use on marketing :tup:
 
.
To use a different example,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidents

Almost all space related accidents are due to Americans & Russians. Does this mean they suck the most at space? or are they the best?

Obviously, its better to be able to build an equipment that sometimes fails than not have the capability at all.

Isn't there the story of Edison having 1000 failed attempts at creating the bulb?

For us in the middle east, having even the ability to create failed equipment would be a step forward.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom