What's new

New Epic Fail of Russian S300 Missile

battle-tested (and proven) against what?
patriot is good only against airplanes,against BM it's useless

Here is a table of Ballistic Missiles launched against Saudi Arabia from Jun 6th 2015 till Oct 9th 2016, All BM that targeted inhabited areas or military base were successfully intercepted.

CuneMKpWcAA1grx.jpg
 
. .
Here is a table of Ballistic Missiles launched against Saudi Arabia from Jun 6th 2015 till Oct 9th 2016, All BM that targeted inhabited areas or military base were successfully intercepted.

CuneMKpWcAA1grx.jpg
Wtf? I've heard of manufacturing consent. This is epic however.
 
.
So now S300 is junk because of an incident!!! What the dumb craps theses days from overdumbies. lol
 
.
That doesn't suggests lack of confidence in American systems. Israel has its own defense industry to cater to.
Israel had it deployed on its territory during Sand storm and Shock and Awe [ modified with improved Israeli software], and still refused it, due to its incapacity to intercept ballistic missiles. All and all, its an expensive piece of crap.
 
. .
Here is a table of Ballistic Missiles launched against Saudi Arabia from Jun 6th 2015 till Oct 9th 2016, All BM that targeted inhabited areas or military base were successfully intercepted.

CuneMKpWcAA1grx.jpg



We know a number of those hit Saudi military bases killing dozens of soldiers. But yea, sure, for propaganda purposes let's call it uninhabited areas.
 
. .
Here is a table of Ballistic Missiles launched against Saudi Arabia from Jun 6th 2015 till Oct 9th 2016, All BM that targeted inhabited areas or military base were successfully intercepted.

CuneMKpWcAA1grx.jpg
We know very well that some of the missiles struck in Saudi Arabia and killed people.
The Patriot system is not an efficient system against ballistic missiles.
Even when Saddam Hussein fired missiles at Israel the Patriot system was poor.
 
.
Once again, the unbeatable and superior Russian S300 got back and bombed its launcher after it lost the target. LOL



Pictures of this junk after it destroyed itself. :rofl:

Cy08WLVXcAAfjXs.jpg


Cy08XJaXcAA0aE2.jpg


Cy08YSNXEAA2wMY.jpg



I admire the Russian marketing team who sold one battery of this untested junk to Iran for billion dollar :omghaha:

This is why cold launch system is so dangerous and west prefer hot launch system , although its expensive to make and operate but it much safer for launch platform even if launch go wrong.
 
. .
Israel had it deployed on its territory during Sand storm and Shock and Awe [ modified with improved Israeli software], and still refused it, due to its incapacity to intercept ballistic missiles. All and all, its an expensive piece of crap.
That was PAC-1. It was a decent SAM system of its time but premature for intercepting missiles. Think of it as WW1 era Tank for the said purpose.

PAC-2 and PAC-3 are true ABM systems, with actual history of intercepting missiles in combat situations. PAC-3 have intercepted even cruise missiles in recent tests. So there's that.
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom