What's new

New Delhi Needs a Change in Tack Towards Beijing

idune

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 14, 2008
Messages
13,663
Reaction score
-40
Country
Bangladesh
Location
United States
New Delhi Needs a Change in Tack Towards Beijing

1046386555.jpg


India needs to understand and accept China’s desire with regard to the One Belt, One Road initiative, says a key policy scholar. India stands to gain much if it loses its baggage, he says.

New Delhi on China's Claims: Northern Arunachal Pradesh 'Integral Part of India'
NEW DELHI (Sputnik) — India should accept and adjust to the reality that China is a first rate power with resources at its disposal and stake in Pakistan, according to Indian policy circles. Beijing would seek to ensure a rough parity between the two South Asian countries as well.
India should have a more constructive stand than the hawkish one in the current establishment, said Srinath Raghavan, senior fellow at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi. This alternate, constructive approach calls for a change in tack in relation to China and pushing smarter engagements including the controversial One Belt, One Road (OBOR) initiative, he said.

“New Delhi underestimates the growing importance of Pakistan to China and overestimates its own clout. The latter also comes from the curious belief that international influence comes from mostly talking ourselves up. Given the disparity in power between the two countries, it was always faintly ridiculous for India to believe that it could stare down the Chinese,” he told Sputnik.

Trump's Asian Pivot: 'US to Jump on One Belt, One Road Bandwagon'
Any future engagement with China must be held keeping this “asymmetry of power” in mind. In that sense, it is worth pondering why the recent meeting between Indian foreign secretary and his Chinese counterpart in Beijing didn’t result in any progress on any substantive issues.
The inauguration of the Donald Trump presidency has made the existing international economic order volatile and it is “important to recognise that the changing global context will impinge upon China and India rather differently”, said Raghavan.

“The collapse of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the rolling out of the OBOR initiative has already provided Beijing the perfect setting in which to pursue a more ambitious agenda of Asian connectivity and integration.”

One Belt, One Road: North Korea May Join China’s Silk Road Project
The emerging thinking within China is to channel their savings within Asia instead of routing it to the US. In this medium-term setting, New Delhi has limited options. An economic integration within the region too has not worked due to the rivalry between India and Pakistan.
“The two sides did, however, discuss the possibility of cooperating on developmental activities in Afghanistan. Again, while this is welcome, New Delhi should recognise that Beijing does not really need to work with it in Afghanistan,” stressed Raghavan.

“New Delhi should reconsider its position on the OBOR initiative. At the latest meeting, the foreign secretary reiterated India’s refusal to participate on the grounds that the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor violates India’s sovereignty over Kashmir. What matters, however, isn’t our motivations or desires but the outcomes of the Chinese initiative and their implications for India.”

India must look at the larger picture and shed baggage, Raghavan said. “The reality is that the Asian economic order is set to undergo far-reaching changes. By refusing to take a realistic tack, India is effectively depriving itself of an opportunity to shape the transforming landscape of Asia,” he said.

https://sputniknews.com/asia/201703041051259388-india-china-bilateral-relations/
 
.
There is an element of truth in what he says, but India recognizes its own limitations.

LEMOA was one step in addressing that short fall.

But its true we cannot yet win a staring match with China, so we need to focus on making India attractive to others and ensure that they improve their stakes in India.

And I think the Modi govt. is on the right track.
 
.
I wonder is the Chinese thought thus way about Japan 20 years ago.

The Asian economic order is not set in stone. It will continue to change. Giving in to a bully only encourages more bullying.

Please grow a pair Mr. Raghavan.
 
.
I wonder is the Chinese thought thus way about Japan 20 years ago.

The Asian economic order is not set in stone. It will continue to change. Giving in to a bully only encourages more bullying.

Please grow a pair Mr. Raghavan.

It doe not matter what the Chinese thought.

Its a simple matter of Game Theory. ...... nothing to do with balls or lack of them.

Pushing back a bully with strength we don't have, will only result in internal injury. The kind that happened to pakistan when it tried to push back India.
 
.
It doe not matter what the Chinese thought.

Its a simple matter of Game Theory. ...... nothing to do with balls or lack of them.

Pushing back a bully with strength we don't have, will only result in internal injury. The kind that happened to pakistan when it tried to push back India.
you use your enemies strength against him. You don't just roll over. China has no friends other than Pakistan and Nirth Korea. It is a country surrounded by enemies, Japan, Vietnam, s Korea even the US. Whwereas India is a country with only two enemies, china and Pakistan.

This sort of cowardly defeatist attitude that passes for "good sense" among some sections of the population in India gives me accute diarrhea.
 
.
you use your enemies strength against him. You don't just roll over. China has no friends other than Pakistan and Nirth Korea. It is a country surrounded by enemies, Japan, Vietnam, s Korea even the US. Whwereas India is a country with only two enemies, china and Pakistan.

This sort of cowardly defeatist attitude that passes for "good sense" among some sections of the population in India gives me accute diarrhea.

To use the enemies strength against him, we need to POSITION our self to do that. That is what the writer is advocating. Not rolling over. Though the article makes it sounds like he is advocating giving up the fight. (that is the sound of chinese influence within Russia)

Acknowledging weakness is not "cowardice", How else do we compensate for it ?Denial is a thousand times more worse.

The problem occurs if we only acknowledge the weakens and take no action to address it. And that is not happening.
 
.
While it is true that India will come out second best in a one-on-one with China, it is not that simple. China has a lot more on it's plate than we do. Like any rising power, they have multiple options as far as course of action is concerned. They can try diplomatic engagement, bribery through economic integration, FDI and trade, flexing military muscle and assymetric warfare.

However, if the Chinese think that they would like to settle their issues with at least one country (India) by simply talking out of it, then the ball is in their court. By all means we should reciprocate if they do.

But we must understand that they are also stretched. Having on-going disputes and one-upmanship with the US, Japan, India at the same time is not exactly a recipe for peaceful sleep.
 
. .
Who Wrote this ---- Article ---

This This This Article is Beyond words ----

So you think Every Lala Land will Jump When China Wishes

Sorry Mate
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom